Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Larry Fitzgerald vs. Cortland Finnegan


Sam Mills Fan

Recommended Posts

32 minutes ago, Moorgan said:

Except that most of our defensive schemes involve zone and changing that would screw up more than one thing. We know our identity. And that has gotten us this far. I agree with the other posters saying that pressure on Palmer is the likely key. I haven't decided if blitzing is the way to do it yet. I need more information to form that opinion. Blitzing opens you up against a good QB. I like Luke and TD covering the middle as usual. Luke proved he is otherworldly just last game. But I definitely don't think we should change our scheme to cover one guy.

We have something very few teams have, but one all teams desire, a shut down corner.

I don't care about schemes, he is being wasted if you're not having him shadow a future HOFer like Fitz.

If anyone but Norman covers him, we'll need help over the top, and we already will need help over the top with their other speedsters.

So why wouldn't we have Norman locked up 1-on-1 with Fitz so the other DB's can help each other out on their smaller and quicker WRs?

By not moving Norman around to shadow a #1 like Fitz it also makes it way to easy for other teams to game plan because they know they can keep Norman off Fitz by just playing him in the slot.

If we still had Bene and Peanut things would be different.  But right now in those places we are playing guys who were sitting at home 2 months ago.

So using the argument of "why would we change what we've done all season?" Isn't valid now as we don't have the players to do what we've done all year anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, tukafan21 said:

We have something very few teams have, but one all teams desire, a shut down corner.

I don't care about schemes, he is being wasted if you're not having him shadow a future HOFer like Fitz.

If anyone but Norman covers him, we'll need help over the top, and we already will need help over the top with their other speedsters.

So why wouldn't we have Norman locked up 1-on-1 with Fitz so the other DB's can help each other out on their smaller and quicker WRs?

By not moving Norman around to shadow a #1 like Fitz it also makes it way to easy for other teams to game plan because they know they can keep Norman off Fitz by just playing him in the slot.

While from a pure talent perspective I agree...but playing the slot is different than playing outside. Bene said it before the season started in the podcast. He explained how you have to know so much more playing slot than playing wide. Maybe the coaches know that Josh isn't comfortable playing in the slot for more than a few snaps. I don't know. Could be a factor. Also our defensive scheme is a big part of what and how we play defense...much like Seattle, and I wouldn't throw it out in this game. But I understand your concern. It's the biggest conundrum for this game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PhillyB said:

coleman will roll coverage to his side of the field all day. he'll also get help on the intermediate stuff from the linebackers, who will often drop into coverage on his side of the field. this will of course open up stuff for other guys on their offense, but that's what blue chip players do for you.

the defensive line will be key to this matchup more than they usually are.

I was kind of disappointed with Coleman on Sunday. He was out of position all day. Don't know what was wrong with him. Hopefully he returns to form this Sunday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Moorgan said:

While from a pure talent perspective I agree...but playing the slot is different than playing outside. Bene said it before the season started in the podcast. He explained how you have to know so much more playing slot than playing wide. Maybe the coaches know that Josh isn't comfortable playing in the slot for more than a few snaps. I don't know. Could be a factor. Also our defensive scheme is a big part of what and how we play defense...much like Seattle, and I wouldn't throw it out in this game. But I understand your concern. It's the biggest conundrum for this game.

I would agree with that if this was against almost any other slot WR in the league as most are smaller, quicker, and shiftier WRs.

But that's not Fitz, he's not running the routes that 99% of slot WRs run, would be a much easier transition for Norman.

Stopping their WRs is my only concern in this game due to our injuries at CB, I think we are superior across the board in all other match ups, so I don't want to see that one thing cost us a trip to the SB in what has been a special season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

We have something very few teams have, but one all teams desire, a shut down corner.

I don't care about schemes, he is being wasted if you're not having him shadow a future HOFer like Fitz.

If anyone but Norman covers him, we'll need help over the top, and we already will need help over the top with their other speedsters.

So why wouldn't we have Norman locked up 1-on-1 with Fitz so the other DB's can help each other out on their smaller and quicker WRs?

By not moving Norman around to shadow a #1 like Fitz it also makes it way to easy for other teams to game plan because they know they can keep Norman off Fitz by just playing him in the slot.

If we still had Bene and Peanut things would be different.  But right now in those places we are playing guys who were sitting at home 2 months ago.

So using the argument of "why would we change what we've done all season?" Isn't valid now as we don't have the players to do what we've done all year anymore.

I agree to a point. 

I think they will sneak in Josh on Fitz on NON passing downs. This can confuse Palmer and take away the element of surprise. 

Then on obvious passing downs play Josh in his normal spot. Don't do this all the time of course but disrupt Palmer and never allow him to get comfortable. 

 

I think rolling a lb over or adding help is the obvious play so that's why i think add some new looks just for this game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, uncfan888 said:

 

 

 

I agree with this.. without having to spy on the QB, it will allow our LBs to roam a bit more.

Personally I'd man up on the WRs with safety coverage over the top, varying in cover 1 and cover 2 type coverages for the safeties, I think that would allow the LB group to help out across the middle and swing out wide for the designed RB passes.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, rodeo said:

KK Short. Pressure up the middle early and often. That will be the key. Make it so our CBs don't have to hold coverage for overly long. We need a feeding frenzy on Palmer.

Yes sir! They can't block both Star and KK and still manage to keep Luke, Shaq and Davis accounted for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think the Njoku interest revealed intent and the type of TE they want.  I really expected more from Sanders.
    • Defensive tackle (or end in a 3-4 base) is suddenly a rather significant need.  It seems to be a forbidden topic on the Huddle.  Well I am going to unforbidden it for this thread. When we lost Robinson, it was a salary cap cutting move, saving us about $9m or so, I think.  That suggests that we are going to get cheaper, younger, and maybe, more multi-dimensional.  First, what did we lose in Robinson: (Charlotte Observer)  "Robinson co-led the team in sacks (5.5) in 2024, and he ranked second among Carolina linemen, behind Brown, in sacks (2.5) in 2025. (Derrick) Brown played on 76.4% of the Panthers’ defensive snaps last year, while Robinson played on 62.2% of those reps. No other defensive lineman played more than 38.3%, as free-agent addition, Turk Wharton, dealt with injuries throughout his first season in Carolina. Wharton played in just nine games, producing 36 total tackles and two sacks. He’s guaranteed $14 million this upcoming season. Read more at: https://www.charlotteobserver.com/sports/nfl/carolina-panthers/article314544998.html#storylink=cpy OK, about Turk Wharton.  The Observer claims that he and Bobby Brown III were to rotate into the Robinson DE position, but that is too weird for my head to comprehend.  First, Brown III is a NT by trade and Wharton weighs about 280 lbs and is not stout vs. the run.  Brown III is not going to provide the internal pass pressure; he is basically designed to take on double teams and dig in.  Wharton, on the other hand, had a PFF score in those 9 games of 40 or so.  In fairness, he was playing with injuries, but Damn.  PFF gives me a higher rating at the Golden Corral buffet.  In other words, we need a true DT who can fill the two thirds of snaps that we just released.  We can't count on Turk and Brown III is not the answer.  Cam Jackson?  Same as Brown.  Have your people do what they do best.  Furthermore, Derrick Brown probably should limit his snaps.  Playing more than 3/4 of the snaps is hard on the body.  A tired player in the trenches is more prone to lower-body injuries. We need a player who can give Derrick Brown some relief and play opposite him as well.  Turk can rotate in but he needs to shoot gaps and give Guards and tackles fits--a change of pace.   I have to think we are going to draft DT much sooner than most Huddlers realize.  My favorite, you didn't ask? Probable second-rounder Gracen Halton (No. 59 overall, according to ESPN's March 2026 update). Once considered a Day 3 sleeper, his 2026 NFL draft stock has exploded into Round 2 or 3 due to elite interior pass-rush metrics.  Projected Round: 2 (Early to Mid) Key Traits: Elite explosive, quickness, 12.2%+ pass-rush win rate, and positional versatility to play inside on passing downs. Combine Highlights: Led defensive tackles in the vertical jump (36.5”) and broad jump, per Sports Illustrated. Draft Stock: Rising fast due to consistent 2025 production (7 tackles for loss) and a "freak show" combine performance, according to Stormin in Norman.  Halton is considered a high-motor playmaker and a potential Day 2 standout, notes   I would not be surprised to see DT on day 2.  
    • I’m old enough to remember when I wanted to draft Njoku We brought back Mitchell and officially kept Tremble. Mitchell Evans isn’t going anywhere. Sanders who knows, he was awful last year I fully agree we need a better TE. This room is awful Njoku would be a massive help in the red zone. However it really seems like Dan and the FO prefer to go young on offense
×
×
  • Create New...