Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If You Bank With Wells Fargo


chknwing

Recommended Posts

If you bank with Wells Fargo you may or may not know this but I found out the hard way.  Apparently Wells Fargo has what they are calling a security measure that limits what you can spend in one day using you check/debit card.  I'm not talking a withdrawal from the ATM, I'm talking just card swipes or online purchases.  Their default limit is $1500 total in transactions daily.  This is important to know because one day you may need to make a purchase greater than that, pay to have your car fixed, pay a medical bill etc.  It can be embarrassing if your at he store and your poo keeps getting declined when you have plenty of money in the bank.  You can call wells fargo to have them increase it to $5000 and if you need more than that they have to have some one higher up overide it.  Its all a bunch of BS.  This should be a security measure you should be able to opt in or out of.  I don't need someone telling me how much of my own fuging money I can spend in one day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, chknwing said:

If you bank with Wells Fargo you may or may not know this but I found out the hard way.  Apparently Wells Fargo has what they are calling a security measure that limits what you can spend in one day using you check/debit card.  I'm not talking a withdrawal from the ATM, I'm talking just card swipes or online purchases.  Their default limit is $1500 total in transactions daily.  This is important to know because one day you may need to make a purchase greater than that, pay to have your car fixed, pay a medical bill etc.  It can be embarrassing if your at he store and your poo keeps getting declined when you have plenty of money in the bank.  You can call wells fargo to have them increase it to $5000 and if you need more than that they have to have some one higher up overide it.  Its all a bunch of BS.  This should be a security measure you should be able to opt in or out of.  I don't need someone telling me how much of my own fuging money I can spend in one day.

But if someone got access to your account and started spending like a thief, I'm sure you might appreciate such a feature. 

I always notify my bank when I'm headed out of the country so they know to allow overseas transactions and I usually call them if I need to make a larger purchase using my card. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was with first union way back in '99 until they became wells fargo and they treated me like I didn't matter when I requested they waive a deposit fee because I didn't make enough to not trigger a $10 fee.. so I sayonara'd outta there to a local credit union and been happy since.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually reduced mine to $300. I know how much I generally spend on average, and anything over that amount is going to be a large purchase so I know to call ahead of time to up my limit for the day. With access to credit card info so easy to obtain, keeping a tight reign on your spending limit is not a bad thing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
    • 1st ⭐️ Big Bussi - 17 saves, .941 save % 2nd ⭐️ Logan Dankoven - 2 assists, 3 SOG, +3, 16:25 TOI 3rd ⭐️ Ghost Bear - 1 goal, 3 blocked shots, +2, 18:48 TOI
×
×
  • Create New...