Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

No one has given a legit reason why the Broncos would beat us


GoobyPls

Recommended Posts

Everyone picking the Broncos is going off "feeling", or just hate for the panthers. I've seen NFL network, FS1 and ESPN all week and everyone that picked Broncos said something like "I have a feeling Peyton", or "I'm rooting for Peyton" or something of destiny or a fairytale ending.

 

All the guys at NFL films are picking the panthers to win by double digits 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are correct, I am feeling that the picks for Denver are either Peyton nostalgia, former players with more fans/friends on the Broncos staff and team, or unathletic, fat analysts like Peter Schrager with painfully over simplistic narratives like ooh wow that Broncos defense eh?  Ooh yeah defense wins championships keep Newton in the pocket Brady sacked, etc.

Meanwhile, it seems every analyst with a handle on X&O's, whether they are film guys like Greg Cossell or former coaches like Billick, are not only in the Panthers' corner, but are closer to predicting a double score win.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It could certainly happen, but Carolina definitely looks better (or at least equivalent) on paper in almost every way. That said, the game's played on the field... but I believe that the guys are prepped, focused, and ready to steamroll some Broncos on Sunday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Generally when the number one O and Number one D meet. The D side wins. Tampa vs Raiders. Seahawks vs Denver. Some that I remember. The difference is our Defense isn't a bottom feeding defense and their offense isn't a top tier one either. 

 

I hope it's a blow out. But I don't think their D will let us score often. Not in the beginning at least. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Ivan The Awesome said:

Generally when the number one O and Number one D meet. The D side wins. Tampa vs Raiders. Seahawks vs Denver. Some that I remember. The difference is our Defense isn't a bottom feeding defense and their offense isn't a top tier one either. 

 

I hope it's a blow out. But I don't think their D will let us score often. Not in the beginning at least. 

This exactly, Denvers offense is a MAJOR libaliity for them in this game, against this defense.

Carolinas offense is by no means a liability against this Denver d.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We should be able run on Denver's defense rather well. Taking out the fact that I'm a Panthers fan I still think we should win. If I had to bet by picking the winner there is no way in hell I would pick Denver.

How in the world are experts picking against us? They don't even offer good reasons as to why we should lose. It's unfuging believable. I have to wonder if you forced these experts to put money on the game if they would change their tune. It's like when experts came out picking the Jags to beat us. What the fug? Didn't even give good reasons why we should lose. It's Panthers hate. It's hatred toward the South. Or it's inexplicable. The tip is that they don't give good reasons why they are making their pick. They give "I feel a tickle in my balls about Denver" type reasons. Unreal. They should be fired. God I would fire them in a heartbeat for being incompetent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Denver's own coaching staff and players have to mystified to find themselves in the SB. Denver's team, just on the eyeball test, doesn't appear to have #1 anything. They must have racked up stats against teams that are complete ass. I mean horrible. We've already played and beaten the doors off of a damn slew of teams this season better than Denver.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • There is a Grand Canyon-sized chasm between your opinion and the opinions of most former player hockey guys who do this for a living.
    • I can only imagine the **** eating grins on the committee right now. "Oh, Bama didn't deserve it? Oh, Miami didn't deserve it? Suck it, haters!" lol
    • To say that, is gaslighting, because it isn’t true. I mean, maybe one or two people do that but it isn’t the predominant behavior. Even Frank has given him credit. I think particularly the Rams game. A couple of glowing posts.   I know I have. Gotta be honest about it because if you aren’t it undermines what else you say.  But the degree of how far I go with credit, in terms of it being a projection of future performance? Not very far. Acknowledge it, but require more of it. There is a lot of bad play to offset.    I tried to remain passive while the last 9 games (post ankle injury) played out. It is just really hard when the lows won’t go away. I failed. As high as a couple of those highs were, there isn’t enough.    I know it is premature to just say I want to move on, made my decision after 6 of those games ended up pretty much really good or not good enough, but I have had enough of being patient and letting him show the reality either way.  So in my view, he Could still validate himself to a decent degree if he smokes the last three starts. But also in my view I don’t expect to see it. Maybe one more high quality start, would be my expectation. So yes he could still somehow justify having the job next year. If that happened I still wouldn’t have much faith given the last three years and all that has transpired. Again, there is a lot of bad play to offset. 
×
×
  • Create New...