Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The media seems to get it


App_Flash

Recommended Posts

So far from the majority of National media (ESPN namely) they understand what Cam did. When you loose a Superbowl it really hurts, but expressly for people like Cam who hate loosing more than anything. He felt like he let his team and all the fans down. It's really hard to put on that face for the media and answer questions about how he feels in that moment and not blow up at them and tell them off. He answered some questions and instead of saying something stupid that would hurt him or the team, he walked away. I'm sure he will look back at this and learn from it. I am new to posting here so I'm not sure if this deserves it's own thread or if I should have put it into an existing thread. But most seemed like they were bashing Cam and I didn't want to do that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's ridiculous that they even have these kinds of media obligations right after a game.  And I don't mind Cam's supposed "sulking" either.  What should he be, content with losing?  I like that he hates losing and lets it show.  Winners are driven, almost obsessive people.  They don't just accept losing.

Are the media forgetting it was Lombardi himself who said "Show me a good loser, and I'll show you a loser"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't blame Cam one bit.  Dilfer (of all people) was defending Cam's decision to talk away from the press on that one.  The reality is he just lost the biggest game of his life.  It has barely sunk in at that point.  Cam is not a BSer.  He's not going to BS the media with QB-Media-Blah-Blahs that so many other QBs do:  "We didn't execute.  We didn't make plays...blah blah blah BS."

Instead Cam is frank and honest.  If he had talked he would have either broken down completely, or said things that would have been the worst possible things to say.  People are going to hate on him for not talking to the media.  They are going to call him names.  Fug'em.  He's our QB, he's emotional, which has its pros and cons.  But he's our guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clearly Cam still has some growing up to do and I expect him to improve from this and likely apologize in the next couple days. 

I agree it is ridiculous that you have to do a presser right after you lost the game of your life, but this is part of being a professional. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly I dont want him to apologize for a thing.  I love Cam as our QB exactly as he is...viscerally hating to lose and all. 

We all fall in love with him wearing his emotions on his sleeve when we are winning but want something different after a loss?  I don't buy it. 

Cam should be Cam - period.  I support him 100%. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Even Janitor said:

I think it's ridiculous that they even have these kinds of media obligations right after a game.  And I don't mind Cam's supposed "sulking" either.  What should he be, content with losing?  I like that he hates losing and lets it show.  Winners are driven, almost obsessive people.  They don't just accept losing.

Are the media forgetting it was Lombardi himself who said "Show me a good loser, and I'll show you a loser"?

i just think back to forehead's "protection problems" comments after the colts' 2005 playoff loss to the steelers whenever i see or hear riveting hot takes about cam's demeanor when dealing with the media

people used to say the exact same stuff about peyton manning

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whoever said that was right though....@nick_81

THey did force us to throw the ball but Shula kept running into that stacked fugin box...every first down every single Bronco was in the screen....no one back nor scared of poo from our O...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Even Janitor said:

I think it's ridiculous that they even have these kinds of media obligations right after a game.  And I don't mind Cam's supposed "sulking" either.  What should he be, content with losing?  I like that he hates losing and lets it show.  Winners are driven, almost obsessive people.  They don't just accept losing.

Are the media forgetting it was Lombardi himself who said "Show me a good loser, and I'll show you a loser"?

I think that's why they have these interviews right after a game, so they can try to get some kind of natural, raw reactions.  I mean why give these guys a chance to compose themselves?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...