Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The real reason Cam Newton left the post game interview


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Listen to what is being said next to him. Not sure why Cam Newton was forced to hold a post game press conference where the defense of the opposition is within speaking distance. 

 

 

 

That is Denver corner Chris Harris speaking in the background. 

 

In short, Cam did not leave because of the media. Cam left because he shouldn't have to sit there and listen to the opposition talk. 

 

Update: According to our good buddy Darin Gannt, all Superbowl press conferences are set up as such. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, top dawg said:

OK, what he was saying wasn't so bad as the NFL fuged up the presser process.  What a bunch of morons that should have known better.

I agree it wasn't anything unusual or inflammatory at all. 

 

But.... why should Cam have to sit there and listen to it. He is there to speak to the media, not listen to the Broncos. Typically post game press conferences are held on opposite sides of the stadium. That is how I have always seen it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's interesting is to check the story titles about Cam's presser and the game.  The language is very telling...

Who wants to walk into that kind of a shark tank?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CCS said:

Like he has been rubbing it people's faces all season? Cam and his hardcore nuthuggers need to grow up.

This really isn't about "rubbing it in people's faces", this is about the NFL  totally screwing up the post-game interview locations. They should be apart for (really) professional reasons, particularly on the sport's biggest stage.  Your nut-hugging references should probably be directed to another location as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I see Bryce's development this way: He improved when his supporting cast improved.  TMac and Dowdle saved his arse last year, but in fairness, most good QBs have good WRs and good RBs--and good OLs.   The 2025 OL underperformed, actually. They were above average, but they should have been elite if you consider the salary cap.   As soon as we signed Lewis and Hunt, I started thinking, "That's not sustainable.  With Ickey about to get paid a LT salary, Moton and Hunt grabbling $50m per season combined, and Lewis around $17m--that would be nearly $100m and the Center just walked.  Yikes.  What does that mean?  Rico walks, Mays walks, and we do not have a top 5 WR on a second contract.  We do not have an elite TE, and only 1 is on a modest second contract. And now Bryce will demand $50m for his incremental rise to mediocrity?   So when we sign Bryce, we will get weaker at other positions.  Hunt, Moton, maybe Ickey and Lewis, will all be casualties--that is the right move regardless (not sure yet about Ickey, but he was not elite) Bryce is one lucky, entitled camper.  No competition since being drafted, and he lost his job for a while to the aging clipboard holder.  Now we are bringing in UDFAs and busts to compete with him.  
    • Probably not.  If we are taking a QB, it would be a prospect to replace Bryce and not a flyer type player.  I can't say for sure, but I doubt he would have cracked the top 3-4 QBs even if he were to play this coming season.  
    • The Giants, Cardinals  and Dolphins should have moved on, but they didn't and ended up cutting their QB early into a monster second contract and had to eat a TON of dead cap money.
×
×
  • Create New...