Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ted Ginn Jr. Running Out of Bounds


PantherBoy95

Recommended Posts

I haven't seen much made of this. Specifically on his long catch he completely avoided contact making no effort to evade the defender for the TD....
I understand that there is life after football, and he was a huge contributor to the season. With that said, I won't state my opinion further than what you can conclude.
However, I'd like to hear from you all....
Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BIGH2001 said:

looked like the safety had closed the angle on him.

That's my initial thought as well, the safety definitely had the angle AND the speed...however it's football isn't it all about making a way out of no way?  I've seen him do it in the regular season and it doesn't bother me as much as he's an integral piece and we need him (along with his personal life/safety.) ...Just...in the Super Bowl?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I rewatched the play and it was actually that piece of dog poo Talib who had the angle on Ginn.  The safety ward was trailing just behind the play.  Talib made up a lot of ground at the end of that run and Ginn was already angling towards the sideline to begin with.  It's hard to see a cutback lane at all based on the direction of the route and the defense angle of pursuit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't re-watched that play but pretty sure Ginn could've cut inside and he's fast enough he could've taken it to house. We'd have been up 14-13 instead of down 13-7 still after the missed FG. He had a pretty horrible postseason all around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no thoughts on it. He was one of the players who was playing like he gave a damn, and it was apparent. Loved that he still brought our personality on the field when he had the chance, doing the simple first down point after he'd moved the chains. 

 

To me, it isnt even worth discussing. Ted is one of the players who are good with me after the SB.. along with the entire defense, Philly, and Funchess. The rest I'm either neutral about or have some issues with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ginn has been great for us, but he isn't physically or mentally tough. The defender cutting him off was Talib. If anyone else (Funch, Olsen, Stewart, Tolbert, Newton) had been in that position they would have run right at him and put him on the ground for what he did to Philly. And they would have picked up another five yards doing it. I love Ginn, but that was a cowardly play and likely cost us points.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, thomas96 said:

I haven't re-watched that play but pretty sure Ginn could've cut inside and he's fast enough he could've taken it to house. We'd have been up 14-13 instead of down 13-7 still after the missed FG. He had a pretty horrible postseason all around.

Um... aren't you forgetting the Arizona game?  His great return, that set up his excellent TD run ("22 yards" that was more like 80 as he crossed the entire field to get open), 2 catches for 59 yards, his 75 yard sprint & tackle to prevent Patrick Peterson from scoring....

If that's a bad game, Ill take more please, sir

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Call me crazy but if you’re in the bottom 7 in efficiency using Zone 84% of the time why not try something else? You paid Jaycee top 5 CB money use him more effectively. Zone is only efficient if you can generate a good pass rush to force a QB into mistakes otherwise you will get picked apart
    • Good Lord this board has become a cesspool of negativity and where fandom becomes something twisted and unrecognizable.  
    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
×
×
  • Create New...