Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dude predicted Carolina vs Denver on Dec 7


Semaj

Recommended Posts

Some dude predicted Carolina vs Denver Super Bowl match up on Dec 7.  Then predicted the Broncos to win the game on Dec 27.    He nailed this and said that you could win big money betting on the Broncos.  He basically says that the NFL and all professional sports are fixed.  I don't know what to say. But what the heck he got it right.  He even predicted a scandal coming up regarding either the Panthers or Broncos and said that whoever the scandal comes out about is the team that will win the game.  The scandal was the Peyton Manning HGH story.  This is some crazy poo.  I don't even know what to think.  Here is the links.  Please don't beat up the messenger.  I am just sharing this with you because it is pretty crazy that he got this right. All of it.  Put your tin foil hats on.  I am not posting this to endorse his illuminati beliefs/conspiracy beliefs.  I am only posting because he nailed it regarding the Super Bowl.  Like I said.  Crazy!  What the ............................

 

First video predicting what teams make it to super bowl 50

second video which says who will win the game on DEC 27

Link to comment
Share on other sites

denver didn't kick our ass. they barely won and had it not been for a couple bad calls they wouldn't have. our offense was bad, their was worse. our QB didn't do well, but theirs did horribly.

and it had nothing to do with our humility. nerves? maybe. overwhelmed at the moment, esp. after realizing that we were going to have to be playing against the refs as well? probably. but because we weren't humble? lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like I said before put your tinfoil hats on.  It was entertaining.  Anyways, he was right about the teams, outcome and that their would be a scandal (Peyton Hgh).  I would like to know the odds of getting all that right.  Yes, he definitely was wrong about some things.  Thank God, no terrorist attack at the Super Bowl.  I don't care about any of the other crazy stuff.  Just the football predictions.  He did pretty good there.  LOL.  If only I would have known, could have make some serious cash.  I wonder if he did put money down for Denver?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was positive the Panthers and Broncos would be the Super Bowl matchup last year, turns out I was a year off. The scandal thing wasnt much of a prediction, as it happens almost every year. The Ray Lewis dear antler stuff, Deflategate, and the Seahawks PED accusations have all had something to do with the Super Bowl the last few years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/11/2016 at 3:26 AM, rayzor said:

denver didn't kick our ass. they barely won and had it not been for a couple bad calls they wouldn't have. our offense was bad, their was worse. our QB didn't do well, but theirs did horribly.

and it had nothing to do with our humility. nerves? maybe. overwhelmed at the moment, esp. after realizing that we were going to have to be playing against the refs as well? probably. but because we weren't humble? lol

LOL they beat us by 14 points and we only scored 10 points! They manhandled us defensively and forced us to play their style. They sacked Cam 7 times, tying a Super Bowl record.

 

The way the Broncos played in the Super Bowl was how they were all season, we on the other hand played way below expectations, I'd say they kicked our ass. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...