Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ed Dickson ranked our LVP (Lease Valuable Player)


X-Clown on 1

Recommended Posts

29 minutes ago, carolina-chuck2 said:

Over Bersin? 

Absolutely. Bersin has a role, definitely not as a starter, based on his versatility. That being said, I would be surprised if Bersin makes the final cuts this season, as our receiving corps is only going to be stronger. KB, practice squad guys, free agents, draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, tiger7_88 said:

I guess the intended irony was too high-brow for you.  :P

So where's the built-in indication on your account that proves you know how to spell? You know what happens when you make assumptions, right?

As for Dickson, I think the Panthers were already aware of his stats and his ranking. He'll either be gone next season or he'll be one of the 'why is he still here?' players. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, carolina-chuck2 said:

I agree he does have a role. Being on the damn sideline doing poo bc JR feels sorry him.

I never said he was good, I just said that he was better than Dickson! Hopefully, they're both off the team next season for better players. The discussion is about least valuable player, and Bersin is more valuable than Dickson. Especially considering the insane number of snaps Dickson has to get while sucking at his primary job duty - blocking!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dickson has never been a strong blocker, his best attribute was always his catching ability but that's not as needed with Olsen playing nearly every snap. But we put him in blocking situations mainly out of necessity, we even played him some at fullback despite having a perennial pro-bowler at "fullback."

That said, when it comes to the other options at backup receiving TE in FA, I like the bird in hand in this case. He's solid in that area, probably better than any affordable free agent. Wouldn't be upset with drafting a young TE, though I see this particular class as average. Henry looks good, though. 

But...least valuable player? That'd probably be Wegher or Norwood, both of which basically just took up space all year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, jdpanther5 said:

But...least valuable player? That'd probably be Wegher or Norwood, both of which basically just took up space all year. 

Right, but given that you can only dress 46 on game day, there will always be guys who just fill roster space.  Year before it was Foucault.  Only time it would be a problem is if we had injuries.  Thankfully our injuries weren't so bad that we had to risk exposing them to waivers, but I have no doubt that if we had really needed the space, Gettleman/Rivera would have made the right call. in trying to demote them to PS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...