Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Online universities good idea, or total waste of time and money?


Doc Holiday

Recommended Posts

So I've started doing a job search in earnest, and am looking at options to finish school as well.  So just out of curiosity anyone have any feedback from attending an online university like Ashford or ASU? are these places legit or a total scam?  

just curious because the availability to take all my classes online would be extremely useful. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, MadHatter said:

We would not even interview someone with a degree from one of the online universities.  But, I am interviewing accountants and financial analysts.  So, I am not sure about other degrees.

Ok, any particular reason behind that?  they claim to hold the same accreditation as a regular university, so any particular reason behind that?  and ASU for example is an actual university and not just a company like the others, so do you still ignore ASU for example?  a lot of these questions are just out of curiosity, and If you work for a company in a hiring position you're pretty much the kind of person I want answering these questions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My wife was looking at using an online university to get some of the basic credits necessary before she enters law school. The biggest thing that we found is not all of the credits you gain at these online universities actually transfer anywhere else. The degree would end up costing around 15 grand IIRC and was absolutely worthless for entrance into Gonzaga. Gonzaga does offer online courses that do count, and comes pretty close to the same as far as cost, since we are Washington residents. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im looking at Arizona State. That's my original school i was accepted to out of high school but knew i would have died being the early inspiration for the hangover.

Honestly I'm looking at courses for something so far away from finances it's not funny.

If you can find an accelerated program with a good name school, jump on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no no no.

only if it's a legit uni that happens to offer an online program as an extra setup. like ECU offers a fully online MBA. that's legit.

if you do devry or capella or u of phoenix or any of those you are an absolute sucker. most of their credits are non-transferable. any chump can pass an online class and learn absolutely nothing as it is, and when you lower the standards of teaching even more it just makes the entire thing a joke. i've seen intermediate-level course rubrics for these programs and they are laughable. my cat could pass them.

if you are serious about going back to school, commit to a place with a classroom and supplement it with online courses from the same institution if you need the flexibility. it will be much harder, but your degree will be worth something, whereas if you go to an online university your degree will be worth nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, PhillyB said:

no no no.

only if it's a legit uni that happens to offer an online program as an extra setup. like ECU offers a fully online MBA. that's legit.

if you do devry or capella or u of phoenix or any of those you are an absolute sucker. most of their credits are non-transferable. any chump can pass an online class and learn absolutely nothing as it is, and when you lower the standards of teaching even more it just makes the entire thing a joke. i've seen intermediate-level course rubrics for these programs and they are laughable. my cat could pass them.

if you are serious about going back to school, commit to a place with a classroom and supplement it with online courses from the same institution if you need the flexibility. it will be much harder, but your degree will be worth something, whereas if you go to an online university your degree will be worth nothing.

Yeah that's what I'm thinking, but flexibility is a must. and is actually my biggest issue at the moment because I work 2 week swings. aka no consistency at all. 
ECU is literally right up the road for me(like 14 mile drive in one direction and no turns), so may be worth talking to them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As others have said, definitely stay away from the online universities. My sister-in-law took out $40,000 in loans to pay for a University of Phoenix "business degree" (and some extra for living expenses) and she still works a poo job that pays less than $30,000 per year. Not a good investment. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/10/2016 at 2:06 PM, Doc Holiday said:

So I've started doing a job search in earnest, and am looking at options to finish school as well.  So just out of curiosity anyone have any feedback from attending an online university like Ashford or ASU? are these places legit or a total scam?  

just curious because the availability to take all my classes online would be extremely useful. 

you say finish- where did you start - will the new school accept all, most, or even some of those credits?

Why do you want a degree? Do you absolutely need it to get into the field you want to? 

Taking classes online is useful but it isn't always what's best for you- depending on the field, research is critical and you aren't going to be chatting with any professors about their research after an online class session ends. 

Be careful, don't get a degree jut to get one. First find out what you really, really want to do- then go do whatever it takes to do that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's be honest, these plays like Univs. of Phoenix really need shut down.   The prices and what you get is almost predatory.  I know that the government was looking into how they were tricking vets into using their earned college compensation there.   Those places LOVE vets and using up that money.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I gave you a full breakdown and examples from last year as to why I think it's unfair to expect 1k from T-Mac this year if everyone stays healthy. But the TLDR version is we will have 4 legitimately good WRs next year, most rookies who get to 1,000 yards don't have any others on the team with them let alone 3 others, it will be hard for him to put up 1k with out the others being injured or falling short of expectations themselves, but in 2026 without Thielen it's different.
    • Ulcerative Colitis is not CTE. 
    • Last year Thielen had 615 yards in 10 games (had more ypg than his 1k season in 23).  XL had 497 in 16 games with tons of drops and Coker had 478 in 11. They also only had only 192 of our 518 targets to get those numbers. So if Thielen has 1,000 yards again, XL and Coker each improve to say 600 yards each, and T-Mac comes in at 800 yards, you're going to say that's not good enough?  Especially if he ends up with close to, if not getting to, double digit TD's like I think he will, as he's going to be a red zone monster for Bryce? Because if that's the breakdown of just the Top 4 and Bryce plays all 17 games, he's going to be pushing a 4,000 yard season as the TEs, RBs, and other WRs will probably add up to 750-1k yards as well, and I think that would be far more than anyone here could be expecting of him this season. Last year the Giants only had 2 players with more than 331 yards besides Nabers and they were 699 and 573 while Nabers "only" had 1,200 yards (granted in 15 games).  While the Jags second leading receiving was a TE with 411 yards and BTJ also "only" had 1,282 but in all 17 games. Odunze couldn't get there (734 in 17 games) with Moore and Allen there, just as McConkey was able to get there because his competition for targets was Quentin Johnson (711 yards), Josh Palmer (584), and Will Dissly (481) who I think Thielen, XL, and Coker are all better than any of them. If everyone stays healthy and XL/Coker have improved, I think Bryce is going to spread the ball around rather than focus on T-Mac in a way that most of the 1k rookies have been able to get. Again I point to MHJ and the Cardinals last year. They had 3,859 yards receiving.   McBride had 1,146, MHJ had 885, then their 3rd and 4th in rec yards were 548 and 414. Take the 146 and 85 that McBride/MHJ had over my example for our guys and give them to the other two and they get to 7 yards shy of the 600 I'm using for XL/Coker, while the rest of the team added up to 866 yards. So, if you expect T-Mac to get to 1k, where are you taking those yards from? if anything, XL and Coker each getting 600 yards seems like a low projection, so they wouldn't come from there. Maybe they come from Thielen now that we have T-Mac as the true #1.  But I think if anything, having T-Mac draw attention will just make it easier for Thielen to get open and him and Bryce have great chemistry already, he's not going to stop throwing his way if he can pick up easy chunks of yards there. So maybe they come from the RBs, TEs, other WRs, but it's I think a very fair example to show why expecting 1,000 yards if everyone stays healthy isn't necessarily fair to him. It's also why I said I'd then expect at least 1,200 yards in 2026, as once Thielen leave and all 3 of T-Mac/XL/Coker get better, they absorb that 1,000 yards Thielen leaves behind with T-Mac probably taking close to half of it and the other two splitting up the other half.
×
×
  • Create New...