Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Josh still hasn't signed tender and could be a no show for Offseason work..


WOW!!

Recommended Posts

If this is playing out as a Josh wanting way more then Gettelmen is willing to pay situation.. And Becomes more of a rental than a core player we want him to be.. Does CB become more of the number 1 need of this team??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

A nasty front 7 can make an average back 4 look really good and that's where G-man is going to continue to build. Norman is a great corner but I really don't see us paying him in the Revis range. 

The 2013 team is a perfect example of this. That secondary was about as average as it gets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

If this is playing out as a Josh wanting way more then Gettelmen is willing to pay situation.. And Becomes more of a rental than a core player we want him to be.. Does CB become more of the number 1 need of this team??

Why would he sign his tender? Once he signs it he is under contract and must me attend all mandatory functions. As long as he doesn't, he can't be fined for not showing up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Montsta said:

Title is a bit misleading. He hasn't done anything to indicate he would miss any team activities at this point.

Yeah, but he's a diva, and divas are a tempermental lot. So we should expect the expected unexpected.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

A nasty front 7 can make an average back 4 look really good and that's where G-man is going to continue to build. Norman is a great corner but I really don't see us paying him in the Revis range. 

Wrong, it can help but a top 10 QB can negate a pass rusher, Huddlers have very selective memory let me remind of you 2013. A balanced team will always be better. Also later part of 2015 was poo when Bene and Tillman went down. Broncos won because they had pass rushers and secondary to throw of the timing of our routes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, The_Rainmaker said:

Wrong, it can help but a top 10 QB can negate a pass rusher, Huddlers have very selective memory let me remind of you 2013. A balanced team will always be better. Also later part of 2015 was poo when Bene and Tillman went down. Broncos won because they had pass rushers and secondary to throw of the timing of our routes.

Allow me to remind you of Mike Mitchell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our 2013 defense was great but by no means was it good enough that it completely negated our weak secondary. We didnt exactly play against prime time QBs that year. Our two biggest threats were Kaepernick and RW who was in his second year and was more of a game manager. Brady torched us in the MNF game and Brees picked us apart in the SNF game. When you play an elite QB you need more than a pass rush, as the great ones can disect the play before the snap and quicken their release

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He’s overthrown WRs numerous times deep,I don’t think his arm strength there is a problem, def seems to be and issue in the 20-30 yard range, I don’t see a lot of outbreaking routes being completed, whether that’s due to his lack of ability to drive the ball to the outside hash or our WRs, especially XL cornering at the top of there routes. regardless of his weaknesses, the question is can a team be built around him to mask them, or can he overcome those weaknesses and adapt. I know it’s beating a dead horse, but something big is missing from Bryce’s qb play that’s leading to so many sub 200 yard passing games, all signs lead to a physical trait that’s the cause of this, wether it’s arm strength or his height  
    • That was fully intentional, because something people who engage in hyperbole can't stand is to be systematically told why and how they don't have a clue. It's the prevalence of this farcical idea that everyone's opinions are valid and the more impassioned they are about them, the more valid they are. And the point of the post wasn't merely to cut the knees of the exaggerators, but to illustrate why it shouldn't seem miraculous that someone like Mayfield and Darnold could come through Charlotte and fail and then suddenly seem much more successful elsewhere, when the reality is that there's far more to being successful at that position than one's own talent. It's also why young quarterbacks like Caleb Williams and Cam Ward deserve much longer leashes to determine their long-term viability and not be written off immediately, because the circumstances surrounding them are hardly conducive to success.
    • I think at some point you top out what God gave you.  He can use leverage via his mechanics to maximize what he has and When he pays attention to it the throws are better.    IMO as a layman a lot of it is what kind of ‘headroom’ you have. The guys who are gifted don’t have to use maximum effort to get good results and stay within themselves but they have it in reserve. They can do an arm throw for substantial distance without max effort.    I think what we may be seeing with these ‘lasers’ is a throw that Bryce puts the max effort into and does his mechanics right and has his base right and it works together.    To get to the payoff here, I think his best velocity throws take dall that whereas  a naturally gifted guy doesn’t need to go full effort to get that same velocity. I have said this three or four times over the years and it never gets picked up on but the accuracy is more consistent with an easier motion and max effort can produce less predictable location. It is a baseball pitcher thing but it applies to throwing a pass too. It isn’t that you can’t make an accurate throw with full effort it is just not as reliably accurate to the same degree. Someone said something about his pro day and that is where I saw it too. He took a little extra step on the deep throws. Some call it a hitch but I don’t see it that way because I don’t see it on shorter throws. He does it trying to get distance. I saw that and just wanted no part of it at 1.1 . That is not tne characteristic of a 1.1 passer.  He should have been at best, late first  I had him second day. Of course I am no one and certainly not a pro evaluator, it is just that he was so easy to suss out. It is kind of in your face obvious.  They must have thought they could fix him. Changing a lifelong throwing motion with the footwork tied into it is not fuging easy. Anyone that had decent success with ‘their’ way and tried to change it to get more, can tell you that.     
×
×
  • Create New...