Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Patagonia


arbnranger

Recommended Posts

I just finished on a 5 day trip to Vail, Colorado. I'm not a skiing expert. I was actually there working although I did take in the scenery. While hanging out I started observing the little Patagonia tag everywhere I looked. At one point, much like a lift pass, it seemed this tag allowed you access into Vail.

I've looked at Patagonia gear many times and I always come to the same conclusion...thin and not worth the value I put on it ...so I don't buy it. 

Im a Columbia man myself. Love their kit and it's good quality and at a reasonable price most times. 

So here is my question. Why is the price tag for Patagonia so high ? Is this awesome branding or is the gear actually legit? 

Your thoughts ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just because it's thin doesn't mean it's not warm. When you get into a lot of the higher-end outerwear, most stuff is going to be light and breathable while still being water/wind proof.

It's hard to understand the difference that good equipment makes until you actually try it. This year I bought a new Helly Hansen jacket and Kjus pants. Didn't have a single day where I felt truly cold, all while skiing in temperatures as low as -15.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i was hoping you were going to argentina.

speaking of which, a few years ago i was in uruguay in a little town perched on the river plate, like 50 miles across the river mouth from buenos aires. it was a unesco world heritage site and a hugely popular tourist destination for insanely wealthy argentinians who wants to make a weekend trip and spend some cash. as a result all the stores with any kind of prestigious name brand were jacked to criminally high rates. we walked into one store looking for a windbreaker and found the cheapest thing in the store was a $400 USD north face jacket on sale. all the patagonia stuff started at around $750.

in other words... stay far away from patagonia to buy patagonia gear

Link to comment
Share on other sites

when it comes to clothes lines like this... you absolutely get what you pay for

I used to be a Columbia guy, but their clothes just don't hold up as well to some of the other brands I've started picking up.  i'm mainly an eddie bauer person now since they're one of the few brands that make nice clothes in tall that will also fit my broad shoulders

the northface's, Patagonia's, etc. of the world generally cater to the 5'9" 150lbs club... but their stuff is built to last

 

one day, i'll have a weeks worth of clothing all from l.l.bean and i'll never have to worry about buying clothes again

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I gave you a full breakdown and examples from last year as to why I think it's unfair to expect 1k from T-Mac this year if everyone stays healthy. But the TLDR version is we will have 4 legitimately good WRs next year, most rookies who get to 1,000 yards don't have any others on the team with them let alone 3 others, it will be hard for him to put up 1k with out the others being injured or falling short of expectations themselves, but in 2026 without Thielen it's different. Because again, I'm not assuming major injuries or games missed when I'm putting expectations out there for the season, I'm assuming good health.  If those other 3 WRs combine to miss a lot of time, then yes, he needs to get to 1k in that scenario.
    • Ulcerative Colitis is not CTE. 
    • Last year Thielen had 615 yards in 10 games (had more ypg than his 1k season in 23).  XL had 497 in 16 games with tons of drops and Coker had 478 in 11. They also only had only 192 of our 518 targets to get those numbers. So if Thielen has 1,000 yards again, XL and Coker each improve to say 600 yards each, and T-Mac comes in at 800 yards, you're going to say that's not good enough?  Especially if he ends up with close to, if not getting to, double digit TD's like I think he will, as he's going to be a red zone monster for Bryce? Because if that's the breakdown of just the Top 4 and Bryce plays all 17 games, he's going to be pushing a 4,000 yard season as the TEs, RBs, and other WRs will probably add up to 750-1k yards as well, and I think that would be far more than anyone here could be expecting of him this season. Last year the Giants only had 2 players with more than 331 yards besides Nabers and they were 699 and 573 while Nabers "only" had 1,200 yards (granted in 15 games).  While the Jags second leading receiving was a TE with 411 yards and BTJ also "only" had 1,282 but in all 17 games. Odunze couldn't get there (734 in 17 games) with Moore and Allen there, just as McConkey was able to get there because his competition for targets was Quentin Johnson (711 yards), Josh Palmer (584), and Will Dissly (481) who I think Thielen, XL, and Coker are all better than any of them. If everyone stays healthy and XL/Coker have improved, I think Bryce is going to spread the ball around rather than focus on T-Mac in a way that most of the 1k rookies have been able to get. Again I point to MHJ and the Cardinals last year. They had 3,859 yards receiving.   McBride had 1,146, MHJ had 885, then their 3rd and 4th in rec yards were 548 and 414. Take the 146 and 85 that McBride/MHJ had over my example for our guys and give them to the other two and they get to 7 yards shy of the 1,200 combined yards I'm using for XL/Coker, while the rest of the team added up to 866 yards. So, if you expect T-Mac to get to 1k, where are you taking those yards from? if anything, XL and Coker each getting 600 yards seems like a low projection, so they wouldn't come from there. Maybe they come from Thielen now that we have T-Mac as the true #1.  But I think if anything, having T-Mac draw attention will just make it easier for Thielen to get open and him and Bryce have great chemistry already, he's not going to stop throwing his way if he can pick up easy chunks of yards there. So maybe they come from the RBs, TEs, other WRs, but it's I think a very fair example to show why expecting 1,000 yards if everyone stays healthy isn't necessarily fair to him. It's also why I said I'd then expect at least 1,200 yards in 2026, as once Thielen leave and all 3 of T-Mac/XL/Coker get better, they absorb that 1,000 yards Thielen leaves behind with T-Mac probably taking close to half of it and the other two splitting up the other half.
×
×
  • Create New...