Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Plain vs Peanut M&Ms


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

This twitter post got me thinking...

 

 

What is more disturbing to me here is that they are plain M&Ms. I was unaware anyone older than 6 consumes them. 

 

Peanut M&Ms are clearly the superior product in every way possible. Not only in taste, but also in terms of empty calories. At least peanut M&Ms give you a bit of protein and keep you full longer. 

 

What say you?

 

This is about Peanut vs Regular M&Ms. I am aware there are other candies available. We don't care how cool you are by throwing some random obscure candy out into the conversation. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Jeremy Igo said:

Love them too. Maybe more than Peanut M&Ms but not as widely available. 

Agree...but some things in life are worth searching for and these are one of them. Almond MMs might be be the greatest candy on Earth. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, osd22 said:

Peanut. However, the Mint M&Ms are my favourite. I'm addicted to them. 

For Valentine's Day they released Strawberry M&Ms , they were horrible, fake strawberry flavor, and I knew the would be, but for always trying new candy research, it had to be done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, I'm starved for contention. If you can't see that and keep wanting to turn things like this back around on T-Mac, then you're just either being purposefully obtuse, or is a fan who is happy having 5-6 win seasons just because we're so used to the 3-4 win seasons and you like "just being better"
    • Chiefs had zero penalties last night
    • You mean the guy who took over a franchise that hadn't had a losing season in the previous 4 seasons... who proceeded to get his team into the playoffs in 3 of his first 4 seasons, only to win 2 games in said playoffs, to then go on to having a 54-74 career record and never won another playoff game after those first two? Who then after being fired from that job, took over a team that was 30-18 in the 3 seasons before he got the job, got into the playoffs that first season, lost their first postseasons game, and then went on to have a 6-26 record over the next 2 seasons? You're literally proving my point by bringing up someone who's claim to fame is that quote. If you just play to win the game, you're never going to be a successful franchise.  You need to play to win the game while ALSO working to make your players better.  Having the former without the latter is a picture perfect recipe to become a stagnant franchise. That's how you work towards being a winning franchise who can contend in the postseason.  And sure, having a stagnant franchise that makes the playoffs every other season is better than what we currently are, but that's not what I strive for with our Panthers, I want to actually contend for championships in my lifetime.
×
×
  • Create New...