Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Plain vs Peanut M&Ms


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

This twitter post got me thinking...

 

 

What is more disturbing to me here is that they are plain M&Ms. I was unaware anyone older than 6 consumes them. 

 

Peanut M&Ms are clearly the superior product in every way possible. Not only in taste, but also in terms of empty calories. At least peanut M&Ms give you a bit of protein and keep you full longer. 

 

What say you?

 

This is about Peanut vs Regular M&Ms. I am aware there are other candies available. We don't care how cool you are by throwing some random obscure candy out into the conversation. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Jeremy Igo said:

Love them too. Maybe more than Peanut M&Ms but not as widely available. 

Agree...but some things in life are worth searching for and these are one of them. Almond MMs might be be the greatest candy on Earth. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, osd22 said:

Peanut. However, the Mint M&Ms are my favourite. I'm addicted to them. 

For Valentine's Day they released Strawberry M&Ms , they were horrible, fake strawberry flavor, and I knew the would be, but for always trying new candy research, it had to be done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Well even if we took diverging paths getting there...our overall assessment of Shough is the same (bolded) lol so I guess that's what matters.  What you call "playing at a level that looks like a veteran starter" is the same thing I'm referencing when I talk about his poise.  Although I still wonder how truly "bad" of a team the Saints are.  Their defense is middle-of-the-road, and their offense does have some good pieces (Olave, Juwan Johnson) outside of running back which is the position most everyone agrees is relatively plug-and-play.  I'm not going to pretend to know anything about the majority of NFL team's o-lines lol but I'm assuming Saints are not great there, although Shough's pressure % seems to have been quite low (and steadily improving) over the last four weeks (20 -> 16.7 -> 15.0 -> 13.0) so maybe they've been playing better as of late, or perhaps Shough himself deserves credit for that.   Some of the language I'm hearing about Shough, including talking about how he's way above league average in several categories, makes it sound like Shough is having a rookie season on par with like a CJ Stroud who established himself as basically a Top 5-10 QB his rookie season.  Maybe that's on me though, I don't mean to attribute anything to you that I'm sure you don't agree with.
    • Since your being selective (and somewhat deceptive) with your comparisons, I'll throw this up so we can compare apples to apples. Both Young and Shough have played against the Rams. Young went: 15/20 (75%) for 191 yards, 3 TDs, 0 INTs with a 147.1 QB rating Shough went: 15/24 (62.5%) for 176 yards, 1 TD, 1 INT with a 81.2 QB rating   Both Young and Shough have played against the Buccs. Young went: 21/32 (65%) for 206 yards, 2 TDs, 0 INTs with a 102.5 QB rating Shough went: 13/20 (65%) for 176 yards, 0 TD, 1 INT with a 65.4 QB rating   Both Young and Shough have played against the Falcons. Young went: 31/45 (75%) for 448 yards, 3 TDs, 0 INTs with a 123.2 rating Shough went: 30/43 (69.7%) for 243 yards, 0TD, 1 INT with a 74 QB rating   Seriously, in what world is Shough a better QB.
    • Freddie? For this game? Seriously? I don’t get it. Hope we get the best version of Freddie tonight.
×
×
  • Create New...