Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I mean....


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Sorry, not Panthers related... but...

 

Ex-teacher accused of sex with students says boy’s grades improved

 

ap-teacher-foto.jpg

 

Quote

Brianne Altice is in prison for having sexual contact with three boys aged 16 and 17, the Austin American-Statesman reported. She filed a two-page response last month after one of the victim’s parents filed a lawsuit against her and the school district. The parents claim the school did nothing when employees complained about Altice’s behavior with students.

Altice, a former English teacher, said the then-16-year-old boy whose parents are suing her would “thwart inappropriate comments directed at her.”

 

I mean, can this be a crime if the victim will forever have it tucked away fondly in his spank bank?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Society for some reason says 'Well they're boys, they're men',"  "This would be any kid's fantasy. It's not....I think the message the court needs to send today is that gender is not the issue here, conduct is."

If this was a young lady or your daughter would you still be OK with a 37 year old male teacher doing the same as  Brianne Altice  did to the 3 boys/kids ?

Man or women its same law , and is inappropriate and sick minded  for any Adult to do this to any child and should be treated the same as well  , A  pedophile is a pedophile.  and yes 16/17 is still a child/kid . 

 

 

 

pevert-Brianne Altice-utah-teacher-pervert.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NcPsa10 said:

"Society for some reason says 'Well they're boys, they're men',"  "This would be any kid's fantasy. It's not....I think the message the court needs to send today is that gender is not the issue here, conduct is."

If this was a young lady or your daughter would you still be OK with a 37 year old male teacher doing the same as  Brianne Altice  did to the 3 boys/kids ?

Man or women its same law , and is inappropriate and sick minded  for any Adult to do this to any child and should be treated the same as well  , A  pedophile is a pedophile.  and yes 16/17 is still a child/kid . 

 

 

 

pevert-Brianne Altice-utah-teacher-pervert.png

But, in that very state, it's apparently okay to have a walled compound filled with multiple teenage wives. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You've got to make the leap from "When I was that age, I would have jumped at the chance" to when my son reaches that age...

And I still find myself at a 50/50 right or wrong stance.

When I switch the gender roles there and think of my daughter and a 30-odd year old male teacher, it becomes a matter of "Would he make it to trial alive?"

I know it is a double standard, but I'm working on it. We want our daughters to remain innocent, but we want our sons to be conquerors. Hard to go against hundreds of millenia upon millenia of hard-wiring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I put less than zero stock in the opinion of any male who says he wouldn't have laid some pipe if presented with the same opportunity at that age.

Just look at how successful the "teenage boy in high school tries desperately to get laid for the first time" genre in Hollywood has been over the years.

Yeah, spare me the moral outrage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Say what you want to say and twist it any way you want , But I as a 41 year old man find it to be  inappropriate and don't find it acceptable in any way ,  Religion or not it still don't make it right  .Common sense trumps religion in a lot of way's , If you don't see it that way so be it , guess i will keep my Common sense and others can keep Religion  ,

I'm not saying if i was the a young boy that I would turn it away at all . I'm saying that her being an Adult makes it wrong on her behalf and she knew better and if not she does now be hind bars where she should be ,,

Put it this way- if a 16 year old girl walks up to me and throws it on me I sure the hell am not going to lick it and  stick it  , It is my place to walk away as I would hope most Adults would  ,  and if not that makes you a  dumb MFer in many ways and should be locked up as well  Women or Man .

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, TheRed said:

I put less than zero stock in the opinion of any male who says he wouldn't have laid some pipe if presented with the same opportunity at that age.

Just look at how successful the "teenage boy in high school tries desperately to get laid for the first time" genre in Hollywood has been over the years.

Yeah, spare me the moral outrage.

I agree. I also think it is still statutory rape and a double standard. What about the creeper who seduces a 16 year old girl...creeper

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TheRed said:

I put less than zero stock in the opinion of any male who says he wouldn't have laid some pipe if presented with the same opportunity at that age.

Just look at how successful the "teenage boy in high school tries desperately to get laid for the first time" genre in Hollywood has been over the years.

Yeah, spare me the moral outrage.

I was raised to respect women. I would never have touched a "Mrs. Robinson" teacher. It's a shame if you're so closed-minded that you "put less than zero stock in my opinion."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, thomas96 said:

I was raised to respect women. I would never have touched a "Mrs. Robinson" teacher. It's a shame if you're so closed-minded that you "put less than zero stock in my opinion."

Oh shut up you jock sniffer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I thought he had a few really nice flashes.  I can see him showing out this year 
    • I have heard that before--when standing in front of a full body mirror at Old Navy.  I said it, actually. Seriously, Let's go on what we know. There is reason for optimism that exceeds random opinions and negativity: 1. Last year, the offense was the priority and the interior offensive line was the focal point. Morgan addressed it in free agency and the draft. They improved.  2.  Last year, Canales pulled Young after 2 games and replaced him with an established veteran.  Instead of giving up on Young, he developed him, primarily focusing on his footwork and timing.  Continued development in his fundamentals should result in improved play.  (this is significant because some athletes rely on natural ability and do not adapt well.  They resort to old habits. This means that Bryce is "teachable" and is willing to face adversity and fight through it.  That is what you want in a QB.) 3. Morgan drafted a raw talent at WR; and we all knew he was raw.  Huddlers are already calling it a bust, but his productivity numbers were in line with the other WRs drafted around where he was drafted.  So, yes, he was a bit disappointing, but what part of "Raw" is not understood here?  Evil Bryce, then inconsistent Dalton, then good Bryce--all while facing the top defensive backs--and let's not forget about his lingering injuries--and we should understand XL's productivity.  Morgan was looking for a home run based on XL's 1-season productivity and his freakish athleticism, but I always thought we would not know what we have until year 2.  TMac alone will make XL better--a solid #2. 4.  If you blame Morgan for drafting XL, you must give him credit for making Coker a priority free agent.  In my view, he addressed WR in 2024 pretty effectively in the long view.  5.  Let's look at the rest of the draft.  Brooks?  The best RB in the draft in round 2?  Morgan was attempting to build a solid run game behind Bryce.  Wallace was a very solid third round pick at LB. Sanders is a strong TE for a fourth round pick. 6.  Not much is being said about the development of Chau Smith-Wade.  His improvement mirrors Bryce Young's, actually.  In his first 8 games, his PFF rating was 36.5.  In the final 9 games, his PFF rating was 66.7.   7.  With so many needs, Morgan hit the UDFA market with success. In addition to Coker, Demani Richardson got 400+ snaps and had a 60.1 PFF grade, including an interception. 8.  In free agency, Morgan spent big bucks on Guards, a move that made his QB better. He added David Moore, Nijman,  He signed Clowney, Wonnum, Robinson, Jewel, Chaisson, Fuller, Scott, D. Jackson, Dionte Johnson, etc.  A few years of Fitterer left him with more holes that players.  Some did not work out, but he did all this on a budget (after he splurged on Lewis and Hunt).  It is hard to get a free agent to come to a team that loses--so in some cases, Morgan had to overpay or accept questionable players. Morgan's first year as a GM demonstrated an understanding of the game like we have not seen since Polian, before his lost it. Canales, on the other hand, should be rated by the improvement of players.  Zavala, Ekwonu, Mays, Young, Smith-Wade, Coker, Wallace--all improved.  He had to overcome major losses such as D. Brown, Shaq, Dionte Johnson, Corbett--and we saw growth.  Despite all this team went through, after 8 games of disarray, This team finished 4-5 with close losses to both Super Bowl teams.  Frankly, I do not know how he did it. This year was better.  The WR room is solid with depth.  The OL room is solid with depth.  The TE room is as good as it has been in a while.  The RB room has the potential to be as good as it was when we had 28 and 34.  DBs?  Better.  DL?  Better.  Edge?  better.  The bottom of the roster?  Much better. We really don't know what we have yet, and that makes this offseason exciting.      
    • Here you go. 2 yards. Bryce Sneak.mp4
×
×
  • Create New...