Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Redskins offered Norman $15M a year. Norman is flying to DC on Friday

Ja Rhule

By Ja Rhule,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Ja Rhule Grand Master

Ja Rhule

Posted
Posted

Looks like he will sign with Washington tomorrow... 

Josh Norman - DB -  Free Agent

The Washington Post reports the Redskins have made an offer to free agent CB Josh Norman.

ESPN's Adam Schefter reports Norman is fielding five-year deals worth between $14-$15 million annually. With an estimated $11.6 million in cap space, the Redskins would have to get slightly creative with the structure of the deal or do some mild cap gymnastics to fit that size contract under the salary limit, but the cap is not a real concern. Norman is meeting with the Redskins on Friday. The 49ers are thought to be the other team seriously involved in negotiations.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SOJA Veteran

SOJA

Posted
Posted

Admittedly the Redskins aren't the ideal landing spot (AFC), but here are the reasons I'm ok with this:

1-Washington doesn't scare me, and they are about to eat up $15 million of their cap space. Same old Washington, as soon as the wheels get on track they do something stupid financially. 

2-We get to see Josh and Odell twice a year now, and have no stake in it. 

3-Josh gets paid. Look I wanted him back just as much as anyone else, but good for him. He went from being the proverbial doghouse to one of the top paid players in the league. He has also always been very gracious with his time towards the Huddle. Good on you Josh!

4-fug the 49ers

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Catufb85 Newbie

Catufb85

Posted
Posted

Enjoy the contract JNo happy for you and achieving what you want...$$$. Can't knock a guy for securing his personal finanace.  Just hope you weren't hoping for playoffs or a ring.  Can't wait until that Monday Night primetime where you will be lining up against KB and he bodies your a$$ all game and goes Randy Moss on your a$$ in the endzone. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • toldozer
      Canales is holding us back

      By toldozer · Posted

      I don't think Dave touches the defense. That might be a mark against him but definitely a huge red flag for evero. He refuses to run anything other than soft zone and when you don't get pressure that's an awful scheme
    • frankw
      This Bryce Guy (General BY Discussion)

      By frankw · Posted

      You don't have to convince me. I think not picking up the option should absolutely be firmly on the table but I just do not see Tepper and Morgan doing that for previously stated reasons. Therefore I'm not going to bother entertaining the notion. Just hoping we actually get real viable competition. If that doesn't happen at the minimum then my perception of that is complete and utter professional malpractice.
    • Bama Panther
      NFL admits the TMac catch should not have been overturned

      By Bama Panther · Posted

      It was absolutely a catch, and I can’t believe how many folks were stating, before the NFL’s apology, that the overturn was the right call.  The ultimate question in this case is this: can a player complete a catch with only one hand? Of course, we all know the answer to that question, and it is an emphatic “Yes.” T-Mac maintained complete control with one hand (believe it was the right) while the other came off when the ball hit the ground. The ball was in the same position in the one hand (watch T-Mac’s fingers in relation to the NFL shield on the ball) after touching the ground as it was when it first went to the ground. Going back to the question above, if one hand can establish control, then there was no need for the other to stay on the ball, so long as the ball doesn’t move in that one hand that stays on it   It blew my mind that they overturned this in the first place. This should not be a “We got it wrong on the replay because there wasn’t clear and convincing evidence.” This should have been, “That was absolutely a catch.”
×
×
  • Create New...