Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

4-3/3-4 hybrid


ncfan

Recommended Posts

This isn't a sign where we are with KK's contract is it?

I don't see us drafting Butler in the first to be a sub for 5 years.

We've seen KK slide out at end, also Butler's comparison is Muhammed Wilkerson who is a 3-4 DE for the jets. 

May be a dumb question considering our D has been been pretty good the last 3 seasons so why adjust it.  But could we see us sliding to a hybrid style D with Ealy, Star, Butler, and KK being the DL.  Understand the bpa, but unsure we'd use it on a guy playing the same position we are signing long term unless we are adjusting down the the getting both in.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

True but it did seem that Gettleman really wanted to try to resign both KK and Star. Butler has been said to able to play all the positions on the line. Gettleman has said big guys make you compete.  We have also signed Soliali who is a backup NT and Love who is a backup UT.  With the big guys help you compete and his versatility I just see us going with a 4-3DE, NT, UT, 3-4 DE (Ealy, Star, KK, Butler) lineup.  Its a matchup nightmare considering we are getting hybrid style LB's like Shaq who can drop back, blitz, cover RBs in space etc.  

Especially if we do hold onto KK and Star. You just don't draft a guy in the first who's going to be a backup more than a year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't get how the title relates to the post but the first thing I thought was how good a 3-4 front line butler -star - short would make, especially with some of the faster, slimmer DEs we have on the roster in delaire, cox, miles and Addison.

would not be surprised if we threw some looks like:

           Butler/ealy-star-short/cj

CJ/delaire/cox                        TD/Shaq/Addison 

 

i know now it's not something we can sustain if teams put multiple TEs/slot looks, but it's exactly the sort of curveball you could throw in to keep teams on their toes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Vernon Butler plays anything like he did against Mississippi State, then the Panthers can cut him now. He was absolutely abused in that game. They ran right at him. He is very easy to double team and does not take chip blocks well. He turns his shoulders often giving the blockers an easy target to get him off balance. Usually finds himself pushed off the LoS in the running game, and gives up on plays when they are run away from him.

His one strength is he is an excellent bull rusher to collapse the pocket when he is one on one. In the run game, he is a non-factor.

Major project.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wondered last night if we might try this. It's how the Seattle style defenses run even though they are a 4-3 under they are very similar to a 3-4 personnel wise. Standard NT and UT(3 tech) with one DE who is on the bigger run stuffing side(this could be Butler) and plays similar to a 5 tech in a 3-4 then a pure pass rushing DE opposite him which is like the designated pass rushing OLB in a 3-4. Seattle themselves don't run that style much anymore now that they have two great DEs in Bennett and Avril but when they lacked the DE personnel and had stronger interior personnel this is what they ran.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, CPantherKing said:

If Vernon Butler plays anything like he did against Mississippi State, then the Panthers can cut him now. He was absolutely abused in that game. They ran right at him. He is very easy to double team and does not take chip blocks well. He turns his shoulders often giving the blockers an easy target to get him off balance. Usually finds himself pushed off the LoS in the running game, and gives up on plays when they are run away from him.

His one strength is he is an excellent bull rusher to collapse the pocket when he is one on one. In the run game, he is a non-factor.

Major project.

Mississippi State had 93 total rushing yards that game. Their season average was 144 ypg. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, CPantherKing said:

If Vernon Butler plays anything like he did against Mississippi State, then the Panthers can cut him now. He was absolutely abused in that game. They ran right at him. He is very easy to double team and does not take chip blocks well. He turns his shoulders often giving the blockers an easy target to get him off balance. Usually finds himself pushed off the LoS in the running game, and gives up on plays when they are run away from him.

His one strength is he is an excellent bull rusher to collapse the pocket when he is one on one. In the run game, he is a non-factor.

Major project.

I too like to base my entire opinion of one player based on one good or bad game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The key term here is ROTATION! These big ass dudes get tired. It benefits everyone to have as many talented guys as possible to keep rotating in there to beat up on opposing offensive lines. You rarely see olines rotate in and out, but with our potential to keep throwing giant, talented human beings at opposing fronts, we could create havoc all game long across the line. That is how you dominate at the line of scrimmage. Dave Gettleman is a very shrewd and smart talent evaluator. Trust the man, he will not lead you astray.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, joemac said:

The key term here is ROTATION! These big ass dudes get tired. It benefits everyone to have as many talented guys as possible to keep rotating in there to beat up on opposing offensive lines. You rarely see olines rotate in and out, but with our potential to keep throwing giant, talented human beings at opposing fronts, we could create havoc all game long across the line. That is how you dominate at the line of scrimmage. Dave Gettleman is a very shrewd and smart talent evaluator. Trust the man, he will not lead you astray.

Yeah I get that but we just signed 2 Solid guys this off season for that purpose in Soliali and Love. We also keep talking about resigning both DT's long term.  You don't draft guy in the 1st to be a rotation player for 5 years 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Rags said:

I too like to base my entire opinion of one player based on one good or bad game.

Kind of like how Rivera and Gettleman based their choice on the Senior Bowl film they just watched this past week. Listen to the presser. They tell you his college tape is unimpressive and this decision was based on the Senior Bowl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Now now now, I wouldn't say there is no logic, but there's just not a lot of in-depth thought put into Barnwell's  "analysis." Now to be fair to him (and other national writers), pre-season team rankings are basically clickbait. And...Barnwell, himself, said that "there's a lot of projection here." He basically admits that he doesn't know how the hell things are going to turn out with our receiver group. He also said that "I find myself" more intrigued by Coker than Legette; that does not mean that he said that fans should be, or that Coker will even be better than Legette (regardless of ESPN's per-route-run stat). So, yeah, Barnwell said some things, but even he has to basically admit that he doesn't know how bad or good that our playmakers will be in 2025.  Overall, what Barnwell is basically thinking is that the Panthers have gotten worse at the offensive skill positions, and baked into that is that others have gotten better. That's the argument in July (meaning, please don't give this any more weight than it's due). I would personally be surprised (not shocked) if we end up worse than the Titans, Pats and Giants at least. Once you throw in the Bills, Giants, Jets, Steelers, and even the Chargers, I personally think there are several teams' skill groups that may end up ranked lower than ours by the end of 2025.  @kungfoodudeis one of my dudes, but like others he is over the tipping point. He's had enough. Seeing is believing. I will say this though: Barnwell's piece is less about logic than just good ol' opinion. And to be honest, he might as well be a Huddler throwing out sh¡t in the summer based upon nothing but good feels or bad feels.  Our offense as a whole (just like any other team's) is going to depend upon the play of the O-line and especially the QB. How you can even rank the skill positions without expressly baking those two things in the cake is beyond me. I would dare say that that's not even logical. 
    • Football is not the professional sport where timidness and apprehension are justly rewarded. 
    • Bryce Young had a super high floor definitely at least won't be a bust safe pick we allegedly had seen in some time.......and went on to have one of the worst rookie seasons of all time.  They are all lotto picks.  And that is especially true for whatever they will be day 1 in the NFL.  I don't think Tmac is a sure thing year 1.  It's not like we watched him do his thing in the SEC.  He was a PAC12 guy.  I'm sure it will take time
×
×
  • Create New...