Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sanchez: I wouldn't call myself a gambler (via Joe Person's latest)

top dawg

By top dawg,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted

From ball field to the gridiron, our new corner is supremely confident in his ability to make plays, and to his credit he made plenty during his last couple of seasons at Oklahoma.

http://www.wbtv.com/story/31917211/panthers-rookie-zack-sanchez-not-ready-for-josh-norman-comparisons

 

He doesn't believe he's a gambler.

Quote

 

After redshirting as a freshman, Sanchez became a three-year starter for the Sooners and earned a reputation as a ball-hawk – and as a player who was not afraid to take some chances going after the ball.

After drafting Sanchez last week, Gettleman said: “He’s instinctive, he’s smart, and yes, he’s a gambler.”

But Sanchez believes that’s a loaded word.

“I wouldn’t call myself a gambler. If I was that good a gambler I’d probably be a poker player right now,” said Sanchez, who had 13 interceptions his final two years at Oklahoma.

“I think it’s a little more preparation than people think – my instincts and my ability to dissect things and read things before they happen. I think you get the gambling title when you jump something a little too early and you get beat.”

Sanchez says those times he was beaten in coverage had more to do with sloppy technique than shirking his responsibility and jumping a route. But he readily admits he needs to improve as a tackler, which is a prerequisite for corners in defensive coordinator Sean McDermott’s system.


 

One thing though, there just might be a correlation between getting beat and taking risks. Just saying. The good thing is that he is not only ready to tackle the problem, but also the work and responsibilities that come with making plays in whatever capacity that the team needs.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
csx Grand Master

csx

Posted
Posted

I am not a scout and don't pretend what I think means anything whatsoever but I have a hunch that if any of these guys is to not make the team it's Sanchez. Some of his college footage is really quite bad. He does not like to tackle. It's sort of interception or nothing with him. I hope I am wrong. I am sure I am wrong, but that's just the impression I got trying to find what this guy was all about.

I hope he  plays here for 10 successful years given that though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
d-dave Grand Master

d-dave

Posted
Posted

In Gettleman we trust!

He sounds a bit like a recently departed CB of ours a little bit...  I love the confidence, but I hope he can get his tackling together so he can see the field.

The more I read about our draft picks, the better I feel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bartin Collaborator

Bartin

Posted
Posted
11 hours ago, carolina-chuck2 said:

Sanchez 4+ INTs in 2016. Y'all heard it first here

If he gets playing time then I can see it but right now he is the backup slot CB and 5th CB. Since he is a poor tackler he offers very little on ST so I doubt he even makes the active roster on game day the majority of the time without injuries which is good because he really needs a developmental year on the bench in my opinion.

If he does play he'd get the 4 picks but give up a bunch of big plays in the process.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
  • Author
Posted
28 minutes ago, carolina-chuck2 said:

Been doing that for years until Norman's breakout last year

To be fair though,  Getty wants some stability in the backfield,  and that's part of the reason why he drafted three corners this year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Stumpy
      Typical Rod ECF Team

      By Stumpy · Posted

      Btw... only Mitch fugging Marner has a better +/- than Key 🔑!!! And, Mitchy needed 5 more games and almost 100 more shifts to get there.
    • Stumpy
      Typical Rod ECF Team

      By Stumpy · Posted

      I was honestly flabbergasted to see Rod send out Stanky and the boys to to matchup against their top line to start the game. The reason that line has been so effective is because they've been matched mostly against 2nd and 3rd lines all year. You've got last change. Use it to your advantage.
    • Stumpy
      Typical Rod ECF Team

      By Stumpy · Posted

      Nobody played well on defense last night. But, the vitriol towards Chatfield (and to a lesser extent, K'andre) is bigly misplaced. People (not just you) just refuse to accept how bad Slavin has been this season. And, I get it. Canes fans (and informed analysts) have spent nearly a decade trying to explain to casuals just how good Jaccccob is at hockey. 4Nations happened and the hockey watching public started to listen. National media even started floating the idea of creating a new award in his honor. Then this season, he gets hurt. It happens. NBD. But, when he finally came back, it wasn't the same. He'll get back to his old self in no time. Probably just some rust, it'll be fine. Only, it wasnt rust, and he's not fine. He's bad right now. It wasnt just last night. Although, that was absolutely the worst game of his NHL career. Slavin (-4) currently has the 3rd worst +/- of anyone left in the playoffs. We've  been begging the world to recognize Jaccob Slavin's greatness. And, by the time we finally got people to listen, he shits the bed! I blame Kash!
×
×
  • Create New...