Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Super Bowl in 2019 - Atlanta named as host


Gazi

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, OneBadCat said:

I wonder if that's  going to cheapen it for the Panthers since they already play there all the time. Should be a good homecoming super bowl win for Cam though. 

I would think it would be hugely in our favor, basically as close to a home crowd / home field as you can get without playing in CLT. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's our turf now anyway. The Roaring Riot card @SCP buried in the parking lot last year will soon be paved over and solidified in perpetuity, tainted with the mark of Carolina Panthers fans and the haunting whispers of Atlanta's championship woes.

The ground is soured.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is really close to all the other SB locations for the past decade. Would be nice for the panthers for nearness , for fans, and for cam for playing at his home anyway. 

I guess a little to far in the future to know but it would be cool to see the Panthers there. Cam would be 29 but our team could be quite different in 3 seasons worth of time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I will as soon as you withdraw your fandom from the Patriots. Informative threads are great but all of these estrogen and emotion driven threads you start are ridiculous.
    • Will be there tonight and expect nothing from the Canes. They are soft and won't go after anyone, nor will they respond when, not if, Florida starts bullying them. Not to mention Freddie is in net. I fear this will be an ass-kicking.  
    • Is this not a bit contradictory?  Also surely if any of us are smart enough to evaluate what we're seeing in real time, a former NFL QB can at least manage the same.  Especially considering he's basing his analysis on hours (maybe generous?) of reviewing All-22 footage which he can play back over and over again, focusing each time on different position groups, match-ups, progressions, etc. which is simply impossible for a fan to fully assess in real time.  Unless you're actually at the game, we basically only get the QB/O-line in frame during the broadcast and even in that limited window of the field, there is simply too much happening.  I'm usually broadly focusing on Bryce, maybe peeping the footwork (or lack thereof) and just the overall pocket and whether there is any pressure coming.  I'm not able to watch every individual one-on-one o-line match-up on top of it to see who got beat, who didn't pick up a blitz, which o-lineman didn't shift to help double-team, or whatever else. I think the truth is somewhere in between (as is almost always the case).  Knowing the play call, audible, etc. is pretty important when judging individual performances, which is why we should always take PFF grades with a grain of salt.  But yeah we can also get a pretty good overall sense of how a player is performing just from watching the game on the couch on Sundays.  I still think there's a lot of value in a review video like this.  As long as you have the bare minimum media literacy to take the interesting insights while also acknowledging inherent biases from a video like this (i.e. obviously focusing on the good over the bad).
×
×
  • Create New...