Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PFF: Top 10 Worst Offseason Moves: Guess Who Made it Twice


Saca312

Recommended Posts

Yep. The Failcons made the list twice. But hey, it's the Failcons we're talking about after all. Anyhow, this was something I stumbled upon. Enjoy this little list. The Sea Chickens and Sucs make it as well.

https://www.profootballfocus.com/pro-10-worst-moves-of-the-2016-offseason/

 

3. Falcons signing WR Mohamed Sanu to a five-year, $32.5 million contract

The Falcons have needed a good alternative target to Julio Jones for awhile, and they seem to expect Mohamed Sanu to be that guy on the basis of the contract they handed him in free agency. However, it’s a little difficult to understand why. Over his career in Cincinnati, at least two of his five best plays are passes he threw, which is not an ideal thing to boast about your wide receiver.

The Bengals were in an identical situation over the past few years of needing to find that second receiver to take pressure off A.J. Green, and gave ample opportunity to Sanu to prove he could be that guy. He responded with three straight seasons of negative grades and 22 dropped passes over that span, with just seven touchdowns from 232 targets.

...

8. Falcons drafting Keanu Neal in the first round

The NFL struggles to evaluate safeties at times. There are so many plays—particularly in college—where they are just ornamental pieces of the defense and occupy space that is never affected on the play. It can become difficult to evaluate their play soundly, and that leads to people fixating on a few highlight-reel plays they make over a season, focusing in on the “can do” aspects of their play, rather than the “how often.”

Keanu Neal has multiple bone-crushing hits on his Florida tape, and his highlight reel would get anybody excited, but those plays are not indicative of his overall production, and over two seasons of PFF grading, he has never been better than average across an entire year. This past season alone, he may have made several big-impact hits, but they came at the cost of missing 16 tackles, and 43 other safeties made more defensive stops than the new Falcon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, The NFL Shield At Midfield said:

i saw this earlier and was surprised rescinding josh norman's tag wasn't on there

Aside from #7 and #10 the other choices are paying someone too much or a bad draft pick. 7 and 10 don't seem to have any upside in their opinion. I do think there's an upside to not paying a CB (especially when he's pushing 29) top money when you're using the Panthers D, and you could even argue an upside to not having him around this year, as far as a distraction with the 'will he or won't he?' aspect. I'm not saying the Josh move wasn't considered by them, but that's my guess as to why he didn't make the top 10.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Sanu point is legit, not that over drafting Neal isn't. He had every opportunity in Cincy to succeed, but basically summed up to a C-grade receiver. I bet you Keyarris Garrett has more upside.

The Falcons will be railing much like the Saints are now in a couple of years.Honestly, I think that the Bucs will prove to be the better long term, if not short term, bet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My favorite is the seahawks drafting for Ifedi. This is the very definition of reaching because of a need at a certain position in lieu of drafting the BPA. G-man has proven again and again that he's not going to reach for a second (or third) round tackle at the bottom of the first, which is what the hawks did. Did we need a long term solution at LT, absolutely! But Gettleman got us a player that will contribute huge from day 1, even if we were already set at that position. I can't wait until Dec 4th, when our first rounder blows past their first rounder repeatedly to flush Wilson from the pocket!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm not saying it shouldn't be a part of his game it should be present yes. But expecting 500/10 in the rushing category is not sustainable IMO. All it's going to take is a defender to be willing to sacrifice a penalty or a fine to send a message just as the Falcons did with Sam Darnold. And even as big and durable as Cam was defenses eventually started to try to send a message to him too. We have to be realistic about not putting our QB at unnecessary risk. Especially given the fact we aren't even willing to run a QB sneak with him. We've also invested a good bit in our backfield that's what they're there for. And furthermore ultimately whatever QB  tier Bryce Young ends up landing in over the course of his career it is going to be defined by what he does as a passer not his rushing ability. That's all I'm saying.
    • Bryce had 191 yards 55% completion 1 td 1 pick.  That's an amazing performance?   Come on people
    • His footwork has been discussed many times over related to not just within the pocket but the quality of his drop backs and how while his receivers have been an issue his own footwork has created issues with his receivers. It is a mutual give and take dynamic after all. As far as his deep passing goes I will happily admit I saw some very impressive long throws from Bryce later in the season and I said so at the time and I'm still saying so now. That doesn't mean that there still aren't issues and beyond some instances of him flat out missing receivers deep that he knows he needs to get corrected I think there are still some throws to the sideline that defenses are going to test Bryce on early and often and until he can prove he can beat defenses on those throws consistently they will play him the same way. As far as talk of Bryce being top ten and the metrics that define that different people are going to have different answers and I've said before after the conclusion of the 2024 season that I'm going to try to put yardage aside in some cases and just focus on what Bryce is doing both between the 20's moving the ball and how our redzone scoring percentage is looking. The biggest thing I'm looking for this season is scoring points. Not just field goals. Touchdowns. If the offense is moving consistently and reaching the end zone more often than not and not squandering drives and settling for field goals then I am going to be content for the time being. I do not expect miracles this season. I expect development and competiveness on both sides of the ball but particularly the offense trending upward given the investments we've made. And no blowout losses. I don't think that's an unreasonable ask do you agree? 🫡
×
×
  • Create New...