Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Remember when everyone was angry that the Panthers cut WR Jarrett Boykin last year....


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Jeremy Igo said:

Huddle gonna huddle. 

 

Do you think he would even be in consideration for the squad this year? Seems like just looking back at that situation really brings how much the unit has improved into focus. Boykin was basically a less talented Norwood, who probably won't even make the team this season. 

I think the plan is to sign anyone with the last name Boykin and cut them before they take a snap.

Anymore Boykins in the NFL? This draft?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People don't understand reality...fugin Ginn wouldn't be Ginn for us if we went off his production from other teams....derp

Some people just thrive at certain places even if they don't/won't at any other place...so who knows what Boykin would have done with this offense...it's not like Brown is a fugin badass athlete or physical speciman...and he wouldn't get picked up if cut either. He also had a poo preseason and looked like ass, so if the argument is Boykin looked like ass and therefore wouldn't have done well in games then Browns turnaround potentially proves you wrong or at least invalidates that stupid reasoning.

It's simple, you don't know how someone would have done if you don't give them a shot and going off what they do in a completely different environment isn't an indication of what they'd do in your environment...we have examples of this on this fugin team and people acting like it don't happen.

We'll also remember that everyone was angry when we cut the other Boykin, especially if the new CBs suck and Brandon sucking somewhere else won't mean poo because it doesn't mean he would have sucked here. In both cases it was legit, because like the CB situation this year, the WR situation last year was full of green players with little veteran presence(Bene in the CBs case)(Cotchery for the WR)...it's not in the realm of insanity to want veteran players with actual game experience on the team.

Honestly the more insane thing, if we take history into account, is that we have a GM who can field total rookie groups and actually has the eye for talent to make that work...coupled with coaches who actually coach...well that does sound insane for the NFL historically....

Hey it takes time to come to grips with that awesome reality...we're used to all of our moves failing/sucking.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, chris999 said:

I think boykin was better than Norwood.

 

But Im not Coach Proel and I dont know if he was coachable or had personal issues or what.

Have to trust the coaches. That being said, I dont think Norwood makes the team this year.

Boykin may just be better than Norwood. His preseason was better than several of our receivers'. He came in, played motivated and made some catches. IIRC, he was a hometown kid to boot. Now, I guess he's been made into a joke, and perhaps  a target of revisionist history. 

That's the Huddle for you.

It will never work on me however. I know what I see. I know the circumstances. I compare stats. 

I think that it's safe to say at this point that we could have easily kept Boykin, especially considering what we already had, and we probably wouldn't have noticed any dropoff (and may have seen an improvement). Moreover, I believe that the Norwood pick was a little bit reactionary, and unnecessary in retrospect. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I had started typing my post hours ago and didn’t finish it and just came back to finish it, posted it, then saw yours and saw we were pretty much saying the same thing - even the games that stick out to us most.  I don’t think a lot of people remember that SF playoff game, but I felt like I had just got mugged in broad daylight.  I remember them calling Mitchell for unnecessary roughness, and then I remember watching Boldin take a super late cheap shot, dead in front of the ref and then showing him watching the whole thing in replay…  the refs let them have a fuging field day and didn’t do jack poo, but if we so much as breathed the wrong way it was fuging 15 yards.  Each team playing under two completely different sets of rules.  poo hurt.  I was enraged.  I’ve never went back to watch either that game or SB50 and never will.  fuging robbery.
    • I’ve said it a million times since, but it’s impossible to keep them from affecting the game.  In SB50, they literally took the game from us, and they did it early.  Cotchery’s no-catch?  The miraculous amount of times we converted for a first down only to have it suddenly called back make it a 3rd down and 15+ against the best defense in the league that specialized in rushing the passer and man coverage on the back end?  And you do that enough times, you kill the morale and confidence of the team you’re doing it against.  It’s telling the one team “you can do whatever with impunity” and the other “you can’t do whatever they’re allowed to do.”  It changes the aggression level.  It essentially neuters one team and allows the other to do whatever the fug they want.  Imagine you call the police for help and they get there and tell you to sit still while the other party beats the poo out of you and you can’t defend yourself.  That’s what the officials do.  There is no way to avoid them affecting the game.  And more often than not, it’s the most subjective calls they use to do so.  Even in SB50…  you saw the Broncos commit more egregious penalties than anything we did, and barely any of it was called.  Their OL was holding all fuging game and the refs did nothing.  We already had our work cut out for us against two future HOF edge rushers and the refs played to their advantage with that.  From what I remember, both Oher and Remmers were called for holding at various times and their hands were in the INSIDE of the defender.  It was garbage, but all by design. Also, if there is any video of it anywhere, go look at what the refs did against us back in 2013 against SF.  The fix was in there too.  They stepped in early and often and ensured we knew we were not allowed to play with the same aggression or intensity SF was.  It was disgusting as well. at this point, I hope Vince McMahon, errr, I mean Goodell just finally scripts us to win it, because this poo is not won via competition or off merit.
    • You can go back to the New York Knicks somehow getting Patrick Ewing.  I saw a story where they place the New York Knick card in the freezer right before the drawing.  It was simple.  Show everyone the cards are undetectable to the human eye.  All they had to do was grab the coldest card. IMO ever since Goodell took over the NFL it has been fishy.  Patriots winning the SB after 9/11, New Orleans after Katrina and Peyton Manning's going away gift against us. The terrible calls during that game were blatantly one sided.  New England should have been stripped of their first 3 SB when they were caught spying on the other team in their SB wins.  I think the evidence against the Patriots was so damning Goodell felt it could ruin football and they brushed it under the table.   In the 2004 SB, How did we go from practically no yards in the first Quarter to setting a record in the 3rd Qtr.  Dan Henning changes the game plan.  IMO probably the greatest half time adjustment of all time.  
×
×
  • Create New...