Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Creamy or Crunchy Peanut Butter?

The Huddler

By The Huddler,
in Carolina Panthers

Creamy or Crunchy Peanut Butter?  

67 members have voted

  1. 1. Creamy or Crunchy?

    • Creamy
      34
    • Crunchy
      33

Recommended Posts

The Huddler Veteran

The Huddler

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Grazing at my girlfriends house at night..  thought it was creamy so I didnt touch it. Couldnt find sshit worth a lick. Said wth, looked at the jar.

 

Got excited to see it was crunchy. Perfect midnight snack... A spoon full of crunchy peanut butter

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ecu88 Newbie

ecu88

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, CarolinaCoolin said:

Crunchy easily. Gives PB&J's that added texture to really take that classic sandwich to the next level. Smooth peanut butter is for Nancy girls 

Fug you Im a Nancy girl :-p

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CoastalCat Newbie

CoastalCat

Posted
Posted

How is the majority for crunchy??? It's like they got in a hurry and didn't finish making the stuff. 

But..."There are two things that I hate: People who don't respect other people's cultures, and the Dutch" 

I like to think that I'm an open minded person. I'll have to give crunchy a shot. I'll also have to give coffee with grounds, oysters with shell bits, eating chicken drumsticks whole, and uncut pineapple a chance. Will report back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      Okay, now face the facta guyd

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • ForJimmy
      JJ Jansen on tanking

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
    • HaricotVert
      Potential changes to playoff seeding

      By HaricotVert · Posted

      I dont buy the idea that it would create more competitive games Given this: Seed Current Format Record Proposed Open Seeding Record 1 Lions 15–2 Lions 15–2 2 Eagles 14–3 Eagles 14–3 3 Buccaneers 10–7 Vikings 14–3 4 Rams 10–7 Commanders 12–5 5 Vikings 14–3 Rams 10–7 6 Commanders 12–5 Buccaneers 10–7 7 Packers 11–6 Packers 11–6 That would mean Wild Card round would have been Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Vikings(14/3) v Bucs(10/7) Commanders(12/5) v Rams(10/7) Instead of Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Bucs(10/7) v Commanders(12/5) Rams(10/7) v Vikings(14/3) Then with the reseed it would mean that highest remaining seed would always draw the lowest remaining team.
×
×
  • Create New...