Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rivera clears up running back speculation..


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Ron Rivera cleared up any speculation on the running backs today. 

 

http://www.carolinahuddle.com/2016/08/09/carolina-panthers-positional-update-running-backs/

 

in short, Stew, Tolbert, Fozzy are locks. 

Wegher and CAP are in direct competition for that third spot

Rivera doesn't mince words here. He means this. You can take it as fact. 

 

Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SOJA said:

I know the Panthers love Fozz, but if you think both Wegher and CAP will turn out to be great players- you have to move on from Fozz and keep both 

I'm not saying I don't agree, I am just saying Rivera means it when he says Fozzy and Tolbert are the second string backs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bLACKpANTHER said:

We kept all of them on the final roster last year - don't see the big deal:

RB - Stew, Fozzy, Cap, Weg
FB - Tolbert

I'd like to see 'em all back again too. IMO the jury is still out on Cap and Wegher, and nothing wrong with good RB depth. These guys get hit a lot. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's motivational but the coaches seem to always side with vets.

CAP's issue is ball security. Idk how that's looking in practice but it's a surefire way to hold himself back.

I just go back to the Giants game when all three were healthy. Tolbert had 5 touches, Fozzy had 4 and CAP had 16

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know the panthers like Fozzy im sure he has good intangibles but honestly I think he is capped out as far as potential and less talented than any other back on the roster, in fact he should have been cut last year for Todman. that said im just a fan with a computer,  I dont coach at any level so he can always prove me wrong. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, stbugs said:

CAP had the most touches the last 3 games without Stewart by a good margin. Again, I think it makes sense to call Fozzie/Tolbert as the #2 to Stewart because when he was healthy, it was just those 3 active. I also think that if Stewart goes down, Fozzie/Tolbert don't become the #1, I think CAP (or Wegher) would move into the #1. What RR said was absolutely true, but that doesn't mean he considers them the #1 when Stewart is inactive.

Fozzy did start vs Atlanta before he got hurt but I think you're reasoning is right and I think it makes sense. Ron seems to see the #2 RB as a position with different responsibilities than the #1.

I still don't want to see 90% of the handoffs  go to Stewart

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why don't we just say they can shove the late round draft picks up their ass? If they want a player they will be starting at WR in Week 1, I want a MLB in return that we can start Week 1. Starter for a Starter Not Starter for a draft pick we'll be debating whether or not they should make the final 53 man roster in 2026.
    • Why?   No. This isn't a situation of a player we want to trade because we have no use for them.  He's our starting slot WR, our leader of the young WR room, Bryce's safety option the last 2 years who he has good chemistry with. If the Vikings didn't run into WR trouble, we'd never have been even considering trading him, so why in the world should we give him up for fair market value in a vacuum for Thielen and disregard what losing him off our roster will do for us this year? A 5th round pick in 2026 is a negligible draft pick, especially with this season being so make or break for Bryce and Canales.
    • The Vikings acquiring all these late round picks has me feeling like we're about to see another CMC situation play out here. Trade a player we really like for the equivalent of what we want for them on the draft pick chart, but because of a bunch of late round picks instead of the one pick value we actually want. Which will do the same thing in the end, nothing, because 6th and 7th round picks rarely work out to begin with, or we're just going to use them to move up 10 picks in the 3rd or 4th round to take another DJ Johnson
×
×
  • Create New...