Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers tight end conundrum....


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

So, we are being told the TE depth situation is still a disaster under Gettleman. I am glad the Panthers had Olsen in place before Gettleman took over. The Panthers have Shockey, Olsen, and Barnidge for 2011/2012, and now the TE position is loaded with waste of time projects. Could of had Olsen and Barnidge sealed up for the long run in the 2013 off season, but Gettleman thought Barnidge had no potential and Brandon Williams was a much more valuable investment.

Also, Gettleman has cut Barner, Kugbila, and Gaffney. Cutting Sandland would mean Gettleman has cut 20% of his draft picks in 4 off seasons. Gettleman throws away 1 of every 5 draft picks. Not to mention all the picks he throws away during the draft. An easy 14 draft picks have been lost over the past 4 off seasons due to poor trades, poor picks, and poor prospect valuations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CPantherKing said:

So, we are being told the TE depth situation is still a disaster under Gettleman. I am glad the Panthers had Olsen in place before Gettleman took over. The Panthers have Shockey, Olsen, and Barnidge for 2011/2012, and now the TE position is loaded with waste of time projects. Could of had Olsen and Barnidge sealed up for the long run in the 2013 off season, but Gettleman thought Barnidge had no potential and Brandon Williams was a much more valuable investment.

Also, Gettleman has cut Barner, Kugbila, and Gaffney. Cutting Sandland would mean Gettleman has cut 20% of his draft picks in 4 off seasons. Gettleman throws away 1 of every 5 draft picks. Not to mention all the picks he throws away during the draft. An easy 14 draft picks have been lost over the past 4 off seasons due to poor trades, poor picks, and poor prospect valuations.

your hate for Gettleman seems to be on a personal level. we went 15-1 last season... you sound like a fan of a team that went 1-15. Outside of the first round, Hurney pretty much threw all his draft picks away

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, uncfan888 said:

your hate for Gettleman seems to be on a personal level. we went 15-1 last season... you sound like a fan of a team that went 1-15. Outside of the first round, Hurney pretty much threw all his draft picks away

Exactly... Hurney was Horrible.. he was 1/6 with Draft Picks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Jeremy Igo said:

Thats what I am hearing. Gettleman has never had a 7th round draft pick and has shown a tendency to trade them away all willy nilly. Indicates he doesn't think much more of their worth than UDFAs. 

This is what Getty has said, himself, about draft picks and their value (from an interview with  Joe Menzer on Panthers.com):



"You're still going to get starters from throughout the draft, if you're paying attention," general manager Dave Gettleman said. "You look at us last year. We had three undrafted rookies starting at the end of the season..."

"When you're drafting, you can't look at any draft pick as a throwaway. They're all critical. Every pick is important. They're all like gold."

http://m.panthers.com/news/article-2/Late-round-picks-college-free-agents-important-part-of-draft/d37e43de-f0b1-4d78-832e-13dbc9754639

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is what Getty has said, himself, about draft picks and their value (from an interview with  Joe Menzer on Panthers.com):



"You're still going to get starters from throughout the draft, if you're paying attention," general manager Dave Gettleman said. "You look at us last year. We had three undrafted rookies starting at the end of the season..."

"When you're drafting, you can't look at any draft pick as a throwaway. They're all critical. Every pick is important. They're all like gold."

 



My point was the Panthers see little difference between the second to last pick in the draft and a UDFA.

They don't. This isn't speculation. Sandland and his draft status gives him zero advantage over Deaver. They are equals.

Sent from my SM-G935P using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, uncfan888 said:

your hate for Gettleman seems to be on a personal level. we went 15-1 last season... you sound like a fan of a team that went 1-15. Outside of the first round, Hurney pretty much threw all his draft picks away

We've all longed for a Super Bowl win, for so long.  We want it for our State/s, we want it for our team, and we want it for ourselves.  This guy has almost made me want it, just so he'll go the fug away...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Jeremy Igo said:

 


My point was the Panthers see little difference between the second to last pick in the draft and a UDFA.

They don't. This isn't speculation. Sandland and his draft status gives him zero advantage over Deaver. They are equals.

Sent from my SM-G935P using CarolinaHuddle mobile app
 

 

I agree with that wholeheartedly. I just want to dispel the notion that Gettleman has some nonchalant, "willy nilly" attitude about late draft picks and UDFAs. 

I am not saying that your info is wrong because you obviously have some inside sources, but I just have to believe that Gettleman is going to make sure, beyond a doubt, that Sandland  or Deaver are worth risking, in light of his own view of the importance of potential talented starters at some point down the road. 

FWIW, I am glad that Deaver has risen to the occasion, and I don't believe that Sandland  has ever taken the fact that he was drafted and Deaver wasn't as a security blanket of sorts. Personally, the only reason that I gave Sandland an edge coming in was due to Deaver's injury history.

They are both smart guys. If they both hold their own during this battle, and the Panthers don't roster one or both, I predict we'll rue the day that we chose Dickson over at least one of them. The only way I see us sneaking them on to the PS is if the Panthers don't let them play---don't show their hand---which would beg a few other questions. If they suck, we won't have to sneak. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From some of the attitudes regarding late round picks and UDFAs in this thread, and specifically the narrative that they amusingly aren't worth discussing, or are throwaway picks, or just have little value at all, let me quote Gettleman again:


"You're still going to get starters from throughout the draft, if you're paying attention," general manager Dave Gettleman said. "You look at us last year. We had three undrafted rookies starting at the end of the season..."

"When you're drafting, you can't look at any draft pick as a throwaway. They're all critical. Every pick is important. They're all like gold."

 

We have gotten starting material from those that people scoff at in different ways. We've seen it first hand. Thankfully, G-man is showing why his philosophy is smarter than some Huddlers'.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gettleman may not care about draft status, but he may care a little bit about the salary of Dickson vs. the other guys.

Granted, we are already in excellent cap shape... but I just don't see the bonus of keeping Dickson over Sandland or Simonson, other than his experience.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, EightyNine said:

I like Sandland.  He looks impressive physically and sounds smart.

But i dont want to go out on a limb and say that he has a high ceiling and that Simonson has a limited ceiling.  Lets keep it in perspective.  Sandland was almost an UDFA.  He has some measurables, but so do a lot of other guys, I.E Brandon Williams, Eric Wallace, etc.)  The NFL is full of guys who are oozing with potential.

I just think its way too early to think that Beau should be considered a potential future starter.  I like him and hope he shows out during the preseason, but i wont be too upset if we decide to go with someone else. Fans tend to go wild imagining the potential of unproven players, and thats what Beau is.  Until you actually see what you've got, the possibilities may seem endless.  A little while ago, people were talking about Byrd replacing Philly..  Philly was a real playmaker for us last year and was very good in the playoffs..but since they havent seen Byrd in real games yet, they can only dream of how good he might be. 

I agree. There's a much higher chance of Sandland becoming JAG than becoming a top tier NFL tight end. But, at least for now, the potential is there. Simonson just does not have the natural athletic ability of today's NFL starters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, stbugs said:

Yep, Sandland has a high chance of not reaching his potential, but he's got more potential. His measurables all together were better than all the TEs in this draft. The fact that he started at Miami and then went to a small school is why he was drafted so late. He's made some really nice catches, but that doesn't mean he'll get anywhere near Olsen's level. I just don't want to lose that potential yet. We are going to need to replace Olsen and I'd rather not see Sandland develop somewhere else for two guys (Dickson/Simonson) who don't have the ceiling to ever replace Olsen.

That's true about the small school. Hopefully he becomes another Gettleman gem.

I'm not saying that Simonson shouldn't be on the squad. I just don't see any reason to keep Dickson AND Simonson. Both are pretty decent pass catchers. Whichever proves to be the better blocker should get the nod IMO. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Nate Dogg said:

I agree. There's a much higher chance of Sandland becoming JAG than becoming a top tier NFL tight end. But, at least for now, the potential is there. Simonson just does not have the natural athletic ability of today's NFL starters.

We have a GM who says the game isn't played in underwear.

Is prefer Sandland for the silly reason I like successful drafts but in the end it doesn't matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is something that has irritated me for a while. I'm going to address his play during these "game winning drives," 8 of them apparently, clear up some nomenclature, and address some points specifically. The games in question.  Also responding to this  What is a Game Winning Drive? This is an undefined term and therefore can be whatever the person using it wants it to be. The term itself removes context from a result which lends itself to be used by people arguing in bad faith. Some people like to attribute every time Bryce is on the field in a situation like this to him "winning the game," or just kind of associating him with a "Game Winning Drive" and leaving it open ended. There's no criteria for what a GWD is. If you had a spectrum of what this could encompass it, on one end you'd have a single player being responsible, and on the other you'd have all 11. Put another way, a QB going 9/9 for 99 yards and rushing the final yard himself is on one end of the spectrum, and on the other is the blocking tight end who was just kinda there. Hey, he was on the field too.  For these purposes, I'm going to hedge and say a GWD is something you know when you see it. I'm not going to claim Bryce hasn't had one, but I'm absolutely not going to give him credit for every one of them. Reasonable people can disagree at the margins, but generally I think we'll be in accord more than not. I also want to look at the context of these, because I think we need to keep in mind how the team got to that position. There's a certain "mystique" about the term game winning drive. Like all of a sudden, when the game is on the line, the QB just turns it on and becomes a better player and blah blah blah. Nothing else matters because he Just Wins Games It neatly ignores the circumstances that led to a team needing a last second drive against some of the worst teams in the league, and this should be taken into consideration. This was an argument made in favor of Delhomme for years...until a certain game that we won't mention.  In reality, defenses are tired by the end of the game, defensive coordinators will generally give up yards in exchange for clock, and offensive playcallers will be more aggressive. That's really it.  But Fiz, why now? Why tonight? People are building this narrative about Bryce Young because it allows them to overlook the rest of his performance, his role in getting the team into whatever hole they're trying to crawl out of, and minimizing the contributions of everyone else (or assigning blame to players other than him) to make him look like he's better than he is/being let down. People in the national media with motivations I can only speculate on are doing this and it's irritating. Also it's very slow at work tonight and it's either this or reruns of ER.  I'll be looking at the final drives here (more or less) when the Panthers were in a position to win or tie. I'll also be adding some context as a I go. So lets just look at these.  2023 Houston at Carolina - 5/10 41 yds, FG  The Panthers drove to the Houston 44, then ran it 6 times in a row for the final 12 yards before the Texans started diving offsides. Panthers weren't just killing clock; Bryce had already taken one sack on the drive (six on the day!), and I don't think any of us feel like Pineiro had a 60 yarder in him in 2023. He did have 5 FG in him though, which is all the scoring the Panthers could muster. It was enough.  Game Winning Drive: eh, Bryce didn't really cover himself in glory here. If you think getting the team into range for a 60 yard attempt before letting the RB finish the job is a GWD, then we're going to have some problems. I'm generally kinda dubious of the whole "wow he set up a long range field goal for the win what a legend." Why yes early career Tom Brady was a fraud carried by Adam Vinatieri why do you ask  Atlanta at Carolina - 5/6 53 yds, GW FG Game Winning Drive: yeah, I think so. It was a miserable 9-6 win against the Desmond Ridder led Atlanta Falcons. Prior to this final drive, Bryce was a whopping 13/18 for 114 yds and the offense had managed 6 whole points. Hard for me to say here they weren't in the position to need a GWD because of how ineffective Bryce was. That said, I think it's fair he did this one on his own. Credit where credit's due little guy, you did it.  2024 New Orleans at Carolina - 1/4, 38 yds Game Winning Drive: not really. Panthers win 23-22. Sanders scored from 16 yards out on the ground, Carolina was only there because of a DPI (a theme with Bryce), Bryce took a sack on the 2 point conversion, and then the defense stopped the Saints afterwards. Prior to this Bryce had a very Bryce esque 15/22 133 1 Td 1 Int performance going so he was just kinda there.  Again, this is where context comes into play. Completing 1/4 passes does not "leading a game winning drive" make. If that's the dividing line, everyone on the field led a GWD, so the term becomes meaningless.  Carolina at Giants - 0/0  Game Winning Drive: no matter what a GWD is, it's certainly not this, and if anyone argues differently you can disregard them. Daniel Jones fumbled on the first play of overtime, Panthers ran a couple times and kicked the game winning FG. Prior to this, Bryce was terrible. Panthers were up 17-7 with 5:31 in the 3rd quarter, on the back of Chuba. From that point on, Bryce went 2/6 for 14 yards. Panthers had two 3 and outs and got just 2 first downs. Panthers overcame him here.  Arizona at Carolina - 0/0 Game Winning Drive: no. On the panthers second possession in overtime, Chuba ran it twice for 49 yards and a TD. On their first possession, Bryce completed a 1 yard checkdown, took a sack, and the Panthers punted after totaling -4 yards. Furthermore, Bryce couldn't convert a 3rd and 3 at the 2 minute warning up 3 points. Arizona got the ball back and tied the game.  Carolina at Atlanta - 5/5, 71 yards  Game Winning Drive: sure whatever have a day. For context, it's generally accepted in Atlanta sports media the defense was trying get the coordinator fired that day, which he was. I was at the game. I'm not saying the players had a conspiracy, but I'm not sure how it would look different if they did. but hey, as long as weird poo keeps happening against the Falcons, let it ride.  Miami at Carolina - 3/5, 45 yards, TD  Game Winning Drive: yes BUT. I don't want to re-litigate this. Briefly, the Dolphins have a historically bad defense, the Panthers were only trailing because of how badly Bryce played, the defense bailed the team out, and Rico was clearly the MVP. Trying to sneak this into a narrative about Bryce and his game winning drives is an attempt to hide how completely dogshit he was for most of the game. On second half drives to start, Bryce went.... 0/1 passing, took a sack, FG 2/3 passing, 18 yards, Delay of Game on Bryce, punt 2/2 passing, 16 yards, took a sack, punt  1/3 passing, 4 yards, punt  1/1 passing, 4 yds, 2 defensive penalties, 43 yd run by Rico, 1 yd TD run Absolutely dismal performance Dallas at Carolina - 3/6, 25 yards, FG  Game Winning Drive: Panthers had 34 yards rushing on this drive, and Rico rushed for more yards on the day than Bryce threw. People will want to point to the 7 yard slant to Renfrow, but that's one moment. Why do you need a 4th down conversion to kick a game winning FG against the worst defense in the league? The Renfrow catch is just as meaningful as the DPI (again) on 3rd and 7. Hard for me to say yeah Bryce gets credit for this and Rico doesn't. or Ryan Fitzgerald. People aren't going to be telling stories about where they were when Bryce got 25 yards passing to set up a 30 yard FG to beat the worst defense in the league.  Conclusion I'd say low end 3, high end 6 for what I'd actually credit Bryce for with having a game winning drive. Absolutely not for the Giants and Cardinals game. Saints game probably not.  As far as questioning which games need a GWD because of Bryce, I'd argue Miami, New York, 2023 Atlanta, and Houston definitely. League average QB play and you don't need the heroics. Bryce had multiple chances to seal the game against the Cardinals in 2024 and couldn't do it. The defense picked off the Cardinals late in the 4th quarter at their 11 yard line after the Panthers went 3 and out, including a classic Bryce check down short of the line to gain on 3rd.  About half of the time, it looks like these GWD, whomever is responsible for them, are happening in part because of what Bryce did or didn't do. I don't think league average QB play is too much to ask for. Panthers usually win these games despite of Bryce; he's an obstacle to be overcome.  Stats Taken in totality, in these situations Bryce's stats are  7 games 17/26 passing for 233, 1 TD  65% completion rating  13 ypc 8.9 ypa I'm not going to compare this to league average, I'm just going to point out you'd expect someone with 8 GWD to have more than 1 TD.  Other side of this  but what about the games in a similar situation where they DIDN'T win? Shouldn't we look at those games too? Maybe find ones where Bryce absolutely lost the game with a pick, or calling an audible into the wrong play, or spiking the ball with zero seconds on the clock after throwing into the middle of the field, or all of the turnover on downs? Maybe also go into some of the games that have been mythologized, like the Eagles game that ended on a turnover on downs where Bryce had 3rd and 4 in Eagles territory and couldn't get a first down? Yeah...someone should do that...
    • Best RB tandem in Panther history (at least for a few weeks)
×
×
  • Create New...