Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bill Voth's 53 man prediction + Gettleman's philosophy


Nick_81

Recommended Posts

I just find it hard to believe we'll keep six receivers on the roster. It made more sense to do so last year and yet rolled out with only five. That said, picking between the two most likely candidates, Byrd and Bersin, is more difficult because the latter may finally be picked up by someone (the Patriots come to mind).  If we keep five only, the free spot goes to either someone that we won't play but want to keep or someone else's cut.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, The Lone Panther said:

Still don't get the lovefest for Fozzy and Lucas should get the nod over Simonson.  And I'm still hoping we sign a DE.  Johnson hasn't had a full healthy season in years, so wouldn't it be ideal to keep 5 DE's?  

Agree.. Simonson has looked bad in game situation and Lucas is a better athlete..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just find it hard to believe we'll keep six receivers on the roster. It made more sense to do so last year and yet rolled out with only five. That said, picking between the two most likely candidates, Byrd and Bersin, is more difficult because the latter may finally be picked up by someone (the Patriots come to mind).  If we keep five only, the free spot goes to either someone that we won't play but want to keep or someone else's cut.



We definitely didn't have 6 WRs of this quality
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, ShutDwn said:

 


We definitely didn't have 6 WRs of this quality

 

But is that quality worth more than quality elsewhere on the roster? That's the answer we'll be getting soon. There is some satisfaction, however, that we have this problem of having difficult cuts to make. Too many answers on the roster is better than not having enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fozzy Whitaker, Brenton Bersin, Philly Brown, Scott Simonson, Ed Dickson, Gino Gradkowski, Mike Remmers, Chris Scott, Wes Horton, Robert McClain and Colin Jones all need to be let go. Those are 11 spots to find new/young players to test out and develop. We all know what to expect from all of these players and seeing the playing field is not what we want from any of them. They are just a waste of time and roster space. Move on and look for players that are more valuable and have potential to impact a game.

Marcus Lucas is the only player who should be on the roster that was left off. Then again I would have had Lucas on the roster over Brandon Williams, Scott Simonson, Brenton Berstin, and Jason Avant the past 2 seasons. For some reason the front office thought those wasted players were/are more valuable than a TE/WR who can catch TDs in the red zone and has a knack for slipping behind the secondary while catching sidelines passes for first downs.

Wasting 20% of a roster on players we know should never touch the field does not seem wise. At least role the dice on a player that may make an impact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Blah biddie blah, blah blah. You do realize that you usually don't have pro-bowlers at every position and back ups. Where should the 11 replacements magically come from? Please enlighten us to all the guys who are now on waivers who would replace all 11 and we will gladly give you feedback on your choices.

Also, you clearly haven't been watching preseason if you would put Gradkowski on the list. He's been a very solid backup to Kalil and a vast improvement over last year. I won't even go into the others like McClain and Brown who are solid depth and performed well when called upon last year. Remember Brown's 8 receptions for 193 yards in the NFC Championship and Super Bowl? How about McClain being the starting CB after Tillman went down?

Again, please give us your 11 replacements. I want a good laugh.

He's not saying they have to be starters, just guys with more potential than the same projects that haven't turned into anything. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, 15 said:

yeah lets cut 20% of the roster including 10% of our starters and replace them with players that were also recently cut or haven't even made a team yet and have no experience with our team or playbook 1 week before the regular season starts.

 

Do you honestly believe any of those 11 players would be missed tomorrow? Their back ups are just as capable as they are with more potential. Not to mention a team has to deactivate 7 players each week. Then you factor in that the bottom 11 players on a 53 man roster see 1% of the field time for a team in a season.

This front office is going to replace 20% of the roster throughout the season with street free agents and washed up veterans anyway. History has proven that point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...