Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

FTW: Rivera had the worst coaching moment of week 1


Cary Kollins

Recommended Posts

Every week "For the Win" picks the best and worst decisions made by NFL coaches.

They make a good point about "wasting a timeout to make sure he wasn't wasting a timeout".

 

 

Quote

Situation: 4Q 11:29, Broncos complete a pass on 3rd-and-7 that appears to be short of the sticks.

After an obviously bad spot gifted the Broncos a first down, Rivera needed some time to think about whether he should throw the red flag. After all, you don’t want to make a hasty decision and waste a timeout on a bad challenge. So what did Rivera do? He wasted a timeout in order to give himself more time to make sure he wasn’t wasting a timeout. The Panthers ended up winning the challenge but were still down a timeout.

Of course, it came back to haunt Rivera and the Panthers. With no timeouts remaining on the final drive, Carolina had just enough time to get in range for a 50-yard field goal. Graham Gano missed it and the Panthers were 0-1.

http://ftw.usatoday.com/2016/09/ron-rivera-cost-the-panthers-a-win-with-the-worst-coaching-mistake-of-the-week

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another bad, yet overlooked, decision IMO - punting on 4th and 1 from our 44 yard line on the opening drive of the 2nd half. We were up 17-7, and a TD making it a 3 possession game then could have stifled the comeback well before it began by forcing Denver to go to the pass and abandon the run. I was shocked Ron didn't go for it - plunge Cam through the line and he would have had it, no doubt in my mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...