Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sobering Read: Cam Newton, Panthers paying heavy price for Moneyball-like approach


UNCrules2187

Recommended Posts

Quote

 

In the eyes of the Panthers, Norman was an imperfect match. He lacked elite speed. He had a colorful disposition and attitude. He was expensive. At the end of the day, the argument was they couldn’t give a player like that a franchise cornerback deal. So the Panthers and Gettleman deemed Norman expendable and saw other ways to use his salary slot. They let him go and then extended offensive tackle Michael Oher. They tried (and failed) to get a long-term deal done with Kawann Short. Mostly, they planned for the future – 2017, 2018, 2019 – because in Gettleman’s book, you can’t deviate from the long-term outlook.

But the Panthers should be built to consistently contend for the Super Bowl right now. And teams sometimes have to sacrifice a little down the road to maximize a championship window in the immediate future. After all, what’s the use of stretching out a Super Bowl window if you don’t occasionally take an over-the-top shot to win a title within it?

The Panthers could have taken some more shots this offseason. They could have made a few more moves, spent a few more millions, and not left anyone second-guessing about the imperfections that are becoming more apparent on the roster. Instead Carolina is grappling with this: A 1-3 team that is looking like an inconsistent facsimile of the Super Bowl edition; a pair of subpar offensive tackles; a thin and mediocre set of running backs; a franchise quarterback in Cam Newton who is getting hammered; and a defensive secondary that is seemingly only as good as the front seven makes it.

...

 

Ask other pro personnel evaluators about Oher, who was out with a concussion Sunday. What they tell you is this: He’s a mediocre player who is viewed by the Panthers as serviceable largely because he doesn’t require an elite left tackle salary. He is cost-efficient. Sound familiar? And right tackle Mike Remmers, who filled in for Oher on Sunday? One personnel evaluator told Yahoo Sports on Sunday that Remmers likely wouldn’t be a starting tackle for most other NFL teams.

That’s what is protecting the franchise quarterback and defending league MVP. A cost-efficient but mediocre left tackle. A right tackle who is viewed elsewhere as a backup. Meanwhile, the running back depth behind the oft-injured Jonathan Stewart continues to be the less-than-inspired duo of Fozzy Whittaker and Cameron Artis-Payne. The defensive front seven has its own brand of problems, too – with few impact edge rushers to speak of.

...

It all boils down to this: What’s more important right now – the Panthers’ $19 million in cap space and expanding the Super Bowl window, or the beating being absorbed by Newton, which risks the entire championship opportunity in 2016 and beyond.

 

 

http://sports.yahoo.com/news/cam-newton-panthers-paying-heavy-price-for-moneyball-like-approach-233823369.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yup, that whole "long-term outlook" is a crock.  Your window is only as open for as long as you have players that you can win it with.  We have a franchise QB/league MVP and a cornerstone LB corps.  We should be making moves like there is no tomorrow.  As much as I hate the Broncos, what they did after they lost to the Seahawks is the blueprint.  But, hey...  we have money and stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who are the high profile or guys that will demand big money next year that will be free agents?

I think the bargain basement deals worked last year but that's not always the case each year.

Of course the 1st quarter of the season shows all the glaring holes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, football is not like basketball.  There should never be a team that intentionally sets out to tank an entire season from day one.  In football, because of the physicality, your window could be shut in the same season it opened.  

That's the thing that frustrates me the most about our "off years."  That is an entire season wasted, and it's not like this year had to be.  Everyone knew our weaknesses and where we should improve, but we did literally almost nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It didn't have to be an either or decision. Some of the guys you sign long term like Norman and Short not only help you win now but teach the younger guys the subtleties of the position and make them better. You can both ensure the present while still keeping your eye on the long term window. It isn't like we are killing the cap and our future to win now

 With the dead money we are gaining, the inevitable increase in the salary cap and the fact that long term contracts are usually friendly until year 3 at least, there was no reason not to extend Norman and Short. Overall contract amounts are easily manipulated. The guaranteed amounts are the only big issues. Norman I suspect would have been reasonable after firing his agent and trying to come back here.

Gettleman was trying to show he is the boss a Nd right now it is biting him in the ass. But don't worry the rookies will look better by week 10 or so. That is what happens with rookies. In the meantime I told you without vet help we were going to get abused early in the secondary. So much for all the toys training camp report about how great the rookies looked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

for years posters have pointed out that the teams with the most cap space in the league are it's perennial losers (me being the most vocal and grating of the bunch)

 

rodeo posted the list of the teams in the league with the most space, and sure enough, the panthers are right up there with a bunch of other bad teams.

 

The NFL is the ultimate Pay-To-See-It sport. If you want to be good, you have to spend money. 

Instead this team has aimed for cap-championships, while the fan base has lauded and encouraged them on for doing it under the delusion that having lots of cap space is a good thing.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...