Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers rankings that may interest you


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, RoaringRiot said:

The biggest surprise is that there ar steams worse than us

I literally read that as there are steams.  

Reminds me of the SNL Celebrity Jeopardy skit.  Where there was a category that's called let it snow, and the guy that played Sean Connery read it as Le tits now!  HAHAHA.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Promethean Forerunner said:

So I take from this is that if we had at least a pass rush, we'd have a winning record...

Or a secondary since that is the biggest difference from last year to this year. Every other positional group is mostly the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Promethean Forerunner said:

Again, we're a defense that focuses on our front seven, not on our secondary. We got spoiled with Norman. We've always had a patchwork secondary (White, Dockery, Mikel, Florence, Mitchell, Thomas, Cason, Lester, Moore, etc).

Bradberry is our franchise DB, but he's a rookie. Our pass rush has to step up in the meantime.

Dude this league is trending towards passing game espeically with all the twinners coming up on the defensive side. DG is behind the curve. Broncos won the SB when they got a top notch secondary. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Jeremy Igo said:

 

Surprise, pass defense is the one area that is lacking.

c00ddffbe23c34528c234935866a0e8f.jpg

 

So when they tripple team our DTs  and send maybe 3 guys to cach and still convert with extra guys on coverage shows  that you can't throw just anybody behind a front 7. DG needs to realize where the league is trending.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Jeremy Igo said:

 

Surprise, pass defense is the one area that is lacking.

c00ddffbe23c34528c234935866a0e8f.jpg

 

 

Bradberry doesn't get injured, we're likely in the 15-20 range.

A DL that could rush the passer minus Bradberry, still likely in the 15-20 range.

Bradberry plus a DL that could rush the passer, we're likely in the 10-15 range.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...