Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Panthers have only allowed 3 sacks...

The Question

By The Question,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

uncfan888 Grand Master

uncfan888

Posted
Posted

I'm not one of the people that wants to kill Remmers, but we have played three division games since then and our division isn't known for rushing the passer.  Atlanta is doing alright, but the other two are in the bottom half of the league. Arizona will be a true test of his ability at LT. We'll see how it goes

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

Atlanta, NO and Tampa defense....none of which are known for or have displayed good defense or pass rush...

this week we play the #2 defense and known for their ability to disrupt.

so the stat is on par with us opening the season against horrible passing offenses and trying to equate that to our pass D being decent. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
nctarheel0619 Newbie

nctarheel0619

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, uncfan888 said:

I'm not one of the people that wants to kill Remmers, but we have played three division games since then and our division isn't known for rushing the passer.  Atlanta is doing alright, but the other two are in the bottom half of the league. Arizona will be a true test of his ability at LT. We'll see how it goes

Yeah, AKA he'll get his ass kicked because he's trash.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Darvinsun Collaborator

Darvinsun

Posted
Posted
48 minutes ago, Navy_football said:

You guys give Remmers such a hard time. He's not an upper tier OT, but it's not like he doesn't belong in the NFL.

Remember Bell and Chandler and Amini? Now that was a crap storm. 

He is in the same line up..if he doesn't  get cam sacked, he close to it..then if there is a penalty majority are on him..he sucks.. he is better than them but not by much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Navy_football Grand Master

Navy_football

Posted
Posted
18 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'm fine with Remmers as a backup, but he shouldn't be a starter.

I hear ya. But, I think a lot of his sacks and pressures are due to play calling, and Cam holding the ball too long. Not all of course, but most.

He's not a shut down Tackle, where you leave him out on that island for the entire game. That doesn't make him a bad player, just one with limitations. I think he's perfectly fine if you were scheming a defense. He's athletic enough to pull and get down field on screens. But you just don't put him on the best pass rushers by himself, drop Cam back 10 yards, and forget about him. 

McDermott wouldn't lock Peanut Tillman up on OBJ for the entire game and just forget about him. That's asking for a 600 yards receiving day from OBJ. That doesn't mean Tillman can't play. He just has limitations that you have to scheme around. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • SmokinwithWilly
      2027: Sharing my thoughts on the cap without a lotta research

      By SmokinwithWilly · Posted

      Actually that 4400 was based on a 16 game season to match Bryce's 16 games this year. Your offense has to be to drive the ball when it matters. Bryce doesn't do that with any level of consistency. If you're building a team that isn't focused on your QB, then fine. Then there's no need to pay Bryce as a franchise QB because literally anyone else will do. If you're going to pay him 50m plus per season, you have to be able to put the team on his shoulders and know he's going to carry the load. So far, when the pressure is on to get it done, Bryce has fallen miserably short of the target. 4-6 to finish out the season and 0-2 when all we need is a win to secure a playoff spot isn't stepping up and proving yourself as a franchise QB. I'd say it's quite the opposite.  There isn't a single coach in this league that would take Bryce over Burrow and very few if any that would take Bryce over Prescott. Hurts didn't have to throw in 2025 because Philly's defense was disgusting and Saquan had a MVP season. But then again, Hurts has shown that he can when it counts, and then there's his signature. Philly runs the tush push to lethal perfection, but that's a play we can't even consider with Bryce. You used 3 QBs from teams that had no defense to show QB stats don't always matter. When we had the worst defense in the NFL, we didn't see Bryce step up and carry the offense and put up gaudy numbers in a losing season because we were playing catch up. It was pretty much the opposite.  What have we seen from Bryce consistently to consider offering him a top 10 NFL franchise QB level contract? At the end of the day, that's all that matters.   
    • KillerKat
      Post-Draft: Gantt sets A stage, not THE stage. Perhaps Reset Your Expectations

      By KillerKat · Posted

      I mean, what fanbase has high expectations when you have a QB like Bryce leading your team?
    • LinvilleGorge
      2027: Sharing my thoughts on the cap without a lotta research

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      If you pay Bryce $50M a year you greatly limit your ability to put the type of team around him you need to have to have a chance to win. THAT is the problem. Hell, we can't win with him on a rookie contract. How the hell are we supposed to start winning with him paying him like a franchise QB and having to make tough roster decisions to accommodate his cap hit? 
×
×
  • Create New...