Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How good have Gettleman's drafts been?


MVPccaffrey

Recommended Posts

Pretty darn good.

2013:
Star - multi-season starter
Short - multi-season starter, 2nd team All pro
Kugbila - injuries, no games played, waived
Klein - high quality depth, has started several games, would probably start on most teams
Barner - very few snaps, traded after one year

2014:
Benjamin - multi-season starter
Ealy - starter
Turner - multi-season starter, pro bowl
Boston - starter
Benwikere - multi-season starter, cut
Gaffney - injured, waived

2015:
Thompson - starter
Funchess - starter
Williams - starter
Mayo - quality depth
CAP - quality depth

 

Too early to judge this year, but it looks like Bradberry will be a starter going forward, and Butler at least quality depth just because our interior D-line is so stacked.

Still, 12 out of 16 picks still on the roster.  And 10 out of 16 are/were starters, very very impressive indeed.  How does this compare to other supposedly great GMs, though?

 

In the same span, Belichick has made 26 draft picks.  With Collins being traded, only Three (3) of those 26 picks are currently starters on their roster!  In fact, only 10/26 are even currently on the roster.  Of the three starters: Brown, White, and Ryan, none have even made a pro-bowl.

What about Schneider of seahawk land?  He's made 28 picks in that span.  Only four (4) of those 28 are currently starting on their roster, and 9 are even on their roster at all.

 

There are GMs who have done a better job drafting than those two, like the Vikings GM, but I don't think any GM in the league has drafted as many starters and depth, at least as a percentage of their picks, as DG has hit on his first three drafts and counting.  And it's not like we're the browns where anyone with a pulse could even make our roster or starting lineup, either.

Really, if anything, I wish DG could get as many draft picks as those other GMs, as he's hitting on them like no one else. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Camvp said:

Pretty darn good.

2013:
Star - multi-season starter
Short - multi-season starter, 2nd team All pro
Kugbila - injuries, no games played, waived
Klein - high quality depth, has started several games, would probably start on most teams
Barner - very few snaps, traded after one year

2014:
Benjamin - multi-season starter
Ealy - starter
Turner - multi-season starter, pro bowl
Boston - starter
Benwikere - multi-season starter, cut
Gaffney - injured, waived

2015:
Thompson - starter
Funchess - starter
Williams - starter
Mayo - quality depth
CAP - quality depth

 

Too early to judge this year, but it looks like Bradberry will be a starter going forward, and Butler at least quality depth just because our interior D-line is so stacked.

Still, 12 out of 16 picks still on the roster.  And 10 out of 16 are/were starters, very very impressive indeed.  How does this compare to other supposedly great GMs, though?

 

In the same span, Belichick has made 26 draft picks.  With Collins being traded, only Three (3) of those 26 picks are currently starters on their roster!  In fact, only 10/26 are even currently on the roster.  Of the three starters: Brown, White, and Ryan, none have even made a pro-bowl.

What about Schneider of seahawk land?  He's made 28 picks in that span.  Only four (4) of those 28 are currently starting on their roster, and 9 are even on their roster at all.

 

There are GMs who have done a better job drafting than those two, like the Vikings GM, but I don't think any GM in the league has drafted as many starters and depth, at least as a percentage of their picks, as DG has hit on his first three drafts and counting.  And it's not like we're the browns where anyone with a pulse could even make our roster or starting lineup, either.

Really, if anything, I wish DG could get as many draft picks as those other GMs, as he's hitting on them like no one else. 

 

Your forgetting the coaches that developed the draft picks into quality NFL starters :)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The argument is based on the premise that because players are starters-ala Tre Boston-that they were somehow good picks and that the team benefits from having them, which is obviously quite an atrociously flawed premise.

 

The Panthers should strive to have as many drafted starters as team's like New England if that means the team has better players and can have consistent dominance.

 

Its also flawed in the sense that every team in the league believes they have "quality depth, is our GM the best executive in league history?" over players like David Mayo whose name you wouldn't know if he weren't here and whose presence could've been easily replaced with any street UFA/PFA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Growl said:

The argument is based on the premise that because players are starters-ala Tre Boston-that they were somehow good picks and that the team benefits from having tbem, which is obviously quite an atrociously flawed premise.

 

The Panthers should strive to have as many drafted starters as team's like New England if that means the team has better players and can have consistent dominance.

 

Its also flawed in the sense that every team in the league believes they have "quality depth, is our GM the best executive in league history?" over players like David Mayo whose name you wouldn't know if he weren't here and whose presence could've been easily replaced with any street UFA/PFA.

I bet you're so much fun at parties

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Growl said:

The argument is based on the premise that because players are starters-ala Tre Boston-that they were somehow good picks and that the team benefits from having tbem, which is obviously quite an atrociously flawed premise.

 

The Panthers should strive to have as many drafted starters as team's like New England if that means the team has better players and can have consistent dominance.

 

Its also flawed in the sense that every team in the league believes they have "quality depth, is our GM the best executive in league history?" over players like David Mayo whose name you wouldn't know if he weren't here and whose presence could've been easily replaced with any street UFA/PFA.

But then what's it say about GMs who half the players they draft don't even make the roster?  That's much worse than what you perceive as a lesser quality starter or depth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...