Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

we could of been 9 and 1 if things went our way


juliosantos

Recommended Posts

WEEK 1 BRONCOS  - blown lead in the second half and a gano miss

WEEK 2 49ERS-    W

WEEK 3 VIKINGS   - blown lead 

 WEEK 4 FALCONS-L

WEEK 5 BUCS-  DEREK ANDERSON ENDZONE PICK 

WEEK 6 AINTS-DIDNT FINISH AND GANO MISS

WEEK 8 CARDS- W

WEEK9 RAMS - W

WEEK10 CHIEFS  - BLOWN LEAD

WEEK 11 AINTS -W 

 if we didn't basically have bad luck and going conservative during those blown leads we would be 9 and 1 and considered a contender . we are better than our record but we dont play 4 quarters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We actually didn't go all that conservative at the end of the Chiefs game.

We were slinging it downfield. The problem was we were backed up in our own territory more often than not and had little run game to speak of due to our overmatched OL. To top that off receivers were dropping passes.

Biggest factor of why we are where we are is a lack of consistent run game. When you can run at will, other things fall into place, and you aren't put into constant disadvantageous situations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

7-3 is more realistic. The Vikings beat us soundly and we were playing catch up the entire saints game.

Vikings didn't beat us soundly. Take away the questionable call on KB on Fozzy's long TD and we easily win that game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, TheRed said:

We actually didn't go all that conservative at the end of the Chiefs game.

We were slinging it downfield. The problem was we were backed up in our own territory more often than not and had little run game to speak of due to our overmatched OL. To top that off receivers were dropping passes.

Biggest factor of why we are where we are is a lack of consistent run game. When you can run at will, other things fall into place, and you aren't put into constant disadvantageous situations.

And Gano punting line drives allowed them good returns/field position 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, brandon_87 said:

And Gano punting line drives allowed them good returns/field position 

Yes but he was being asked to play a position he doesn't play. Most teams would be in a pickle if their punter got hurt. If we had a 2nd half offense that could put together drives that would have helped

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Camp Fodder said:

Yes but he was being asked to play a position he doesn't play. Most teams would be in a pickle if their punter got hurt. If we had a 2nd half offense that could put together drives that would have helped

I agree with that, just pointing out anot j er reason the KC game went down like it did

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, TheRed said:

We actually didn't go all that conservative at the end of the Chiefs game.

We were slinging it downfield. The problem was we were backed up in our own territory more often than not and had little run game to speak of due to our overmatched OL. To top that off receivers were dropping passes.

Biggest factor of why we are where we are is a lack of consistent run game. When you can run at will, other things fall into place, and you aren't put into constant disadvantageous situations.

I agree with this more than any other excuse.  Same reason we lost the superbowl. When we can't run the opposing D keys in on Cam and our dumbass read option play action bs playcalling that doesn't work with a poo O line.  Cam was productive last year because for so many games (i think streak was 18-20 games until SB) we had over 100 yards rushing and our offense was balanced.  We got totally exposed in the SB on a talent and coaching level.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, TheRed said:

We actually didn't go all that conservative at the end of the Chiefs game.

We were slinging it downfield. The problem was we were backed up in our own territory more often than not and had little run game to speak of due to our overmatched OL. To top that off receivers were dropping passes.

Yep. Let's not forget everyone was being critical of Rivera and Cam for being too aggressive - forcing a throw on that pick six late in the game, and then trying to score with under 30 seconds left.

6 hours ago, TheRed said:

Biggest factor of why we are where we are is a lack of consistent run game. When you can run at will, other things fall into place, and you aren't put into constant disadvantageous situations.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not many people talking about DT, but we have a need.  (DE)  Now this guy is a NT like Brown III
    • But is it about letting Bryce develop or about winning games? Bryce has not been good enough to be an uncontested starter. He just hasn't. How many times has last drive Bryce shown up for 4 entire quarters? Once in 3 seasons? You aren't going to win 9 or 10 one score games every season year in and year out. You may want Bryce in the last 2 minutes. I want that Bryce the full 60.  No one is saying you have to give up on him, but bringing in another QB that can do anything is not hindering Bryce. It helps the team and that's where the focus needs to be. If drafting Sadiq to plague the middle of the field would help out offense, but Bryce struggles to get pass into the middle of the field, is Sadiq a bad pick? Or could he be a good pick with a better option at QB? We can't be afraid to improve. QB, TE, OL, LB, DL, CB, S. It doesn't matter. The goal is SBs, not 5 to 8 years seeing waiting to see if Bryce can develop while the rest of the league keeps passing us by.  Sadiq is a nice option, but I think we have to address tackle if one we like is there because we are painfully thin after this year, a LB to general the field, and a true ball hawking safety that can set the tone in the secondary. Those 3 positions are bigger game changers than a TE that will likely struggle to make a round 1 impact in this offense. 
    • Lil Stanky 100% in the dot tonight... And our 2nd line has been our best offensive line this season. Maybe our 2C really was on the roster this whole time...?
×
×
  • Create New...