Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

going to the game with fire shula signs


juliosantos

Recommended Posts

I don't like the idea. you should go to the game to cheer on the team of your choice, not to advocate for firings. I went to several games during the 2-14 and 1-15 seasons, and while the games weren't particularly enjoyable from the Carolina perspective, I never felt like it was all that helpful or productive to yell about people getting fired. that's what talk radio and internet forums and letters to the editor and the coffee shop and the bar and awkward family gatherings and literally everywhere else in your entire life are for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, steven8989 said:


I don't think u notice but when ur offense is predictable and you go three and out all the time it's offense not defense. Even Bennett from Seattle said we play conservative.


Sent from my XT1254 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app
 

Conservative is not synonymous with poor or even problematic. We don't go three and out all the time either. Of 141 possessions we went 3 and out  25 times. When you deduct those 3 and outs where we had a big lead and were just running clock it ends up being less than 20. If that is all the time then you are right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Malt Liquor said:

Mike Shula is still terrible at designing plays. And his play calling stinks. The only logical reason I think Ron Rivera has him as the OC is I think he wanted a coach with inferior skills to his, for job security. The crazy thing is he had the right OC when he first became the HC in Chud. If I was Ron Rivera I would fire Mike Shula and get on the phone and call Rob Chudzinski, and offer him back his job. What do we got to lose? 

That is stupid. Pundits who are offensive gurus have talked about innovative and creative Shula is. We are boring and predictable this year for 1 reason. You can only be as creative as the least experienced player can absorb and learn. Shula has had to dial it back because of the changes to the offensive line and guys not knowing anything but the basic blocking schemes and protections. This should be obvious to anyone who has coached above the pee wee level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, panthers55 said:

That is stupid. Pundits who are offensive gurus have talked about innovative and creative Shula is. We are boring and predictable this year for 1 reason. You can only be as creative as the least experienced player can absorb and learn. Shula has had to dial it back because of the changes to the offensive line and guys not knowing anything but the basic blocking schemes and protections. This should be obvious to anyone who has coached above the pee wee level.

Never ceases to amaze me the level of ignorance on this board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not many people talking about DT, but we have a need.  (DE)  Now this guy is a NT like Brown III
    • But is it about letting Bryce develop or about winning games? Bryce has not been good enough to be an uncontested starter. He just hasn't. How many times has last drive Bryce shown up for 4 entire quarters? Once in 3 seasons? You aren't going to win 9 or 10 one score games every season year in and year out. You may want Bryce in the last 2 minutes. I want that Bryce the full 60.  No one is saying you have to give up on him, but bringing in another QB that can do anything is not hindering Bryce. It helps the team and that's where the focus needs to be. If drafting Sadiq to plague the middle of the field would help out offense, but Bryce struggles to get pass into the middle of the field, is Sadiq a bad pick? Or could he be a good pick with a better option at QB? We can't be afraid to improve. QB, TE, OL, LB, DL, CB, S. It doesn't matter. The goal is SBs, not 5 to 8 years seeing waiting to see if Bryce can develop while the rest of the league keeps passing us by.  Sadiq is a nice option, but I think we have to address tackle if one we like is there because we are painfully thin after this year, a LB to general the field, and a true ball hawking safety that can set the tone in the secondary. Those 3 positions are bigger game changers than a TE that will likely struggle to make a round 1 impact in this offense. 
    • Lil Stanky 100% in the dot tonight... And our 2nd line has been our best offensive line this season. Maybe our 2C really was on the roster this whole time...?
×
×
  • Create New...