Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rob Chudzinski


Jangler

Chud for Coach 2017?  

85 members have voted

  1. 1. Chud for Coach?

    • Yes
      10
    • Sure/wtf?
      8
    • No
      59
    • merkins are stupid
      8


Recommended Posts

I don't want Chud because that is going backwards. Shula's offense is better than what Chud put out there and the facts prove it.  If we are going to replace Shula it needs to be a big upgrade. Otherwise why take a year or two to adjust and not have a better product? 

Now who out there is a genius who can overcome mediocre receivers, a crappy line, tons of injuries and a running back who struggles to stay on the field and field a top 5 offense. Because with all those problems we are still 14th in points after some really  bad performances against teams like Minnesota and Seattle. And are they available and want to come here and have NFL experience....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

I don't want Chud because that is going backwards. Shula's offense is better than what Chud put out there and the facts prove it.  If we are going to replace Shula it needs to be a big upgrade. Otherwise why take a year or two to adjust and not have a better product? 

Now who out there is a genius who can overcome mediocre receivers, a crappy line, tons of injuries and a running back who struggles to stay on the field and field a top 5 offense. Because with all those problems we are still 14th in points after some really  bad performances against teams like Minnesota and Seattle. And are they available and want to come here and have NFL experience....

^^^This guy understands what the situation is better than just about everyone else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd like Chud to return over Shula, my thing is who is out there that is available?

However considering what the offense did last year, and being middle of the pack this year, I don't see any scape goats, as the excuses are already in line. 

Our same receivers got separation last year, to me it all comes back to not being able to protect Cam similar to 2014, the Byron Bell, Nate Chandler line. And even still we finished 7-8-1; but the defense was better that season as well by comparison. 

I'd like to see more of Ginn, and Brown on the field at the same time, keep KB and Olsen outside, start Ginn, and Brown while Funchess rotates into the line-up. Then once inside the 20's we can go to the tree's all being on the field together. 

We do too much (or at least it feels this way) base personnel where defenses are allowed to stay in their 4-3 or 3-4 and defend the run. I'd like to see more 3 and 4 wide. I'm not a fan of the empty because it feels like our backs are more concerned with a route than assisting the tackles vs premium rushers when they need to chip. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm also over Fozzy Whittaker, I'm sorry he doesn't move the needle for me, and I have no idea why he and Tolbert are viewed as the 2nd HB. Either CAP is terrible, or our staff is loyal to a fault to vets. It's one or the other. 

Rivera has said numerous times we are looking for a scat back, and to me we had one, and cut him to keep Fozzy, his name was Jordan Todman. he looked better than everyone behind Stewart that pre-season. Even losing out on Wegher, personally I'd take Wegher, Todman, CAP or Stewart, Whittaker Tolbert. And I like J-Stew alot, but if I had to choose a trio I'd choose the former. 

We have a very slow, and non-explosive backfield, we lost that when Williams was cut, I know a lot of fans soured on him, BUT he was a home run hitter at HB, he unfortunately got too comfortable. You see teams with worse OL still produce decent running when the back can bounce it, none of ours can do this, the one that possibly could has been inactive nearly every game for two seasons now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TheRed said:

As a head coach? Um, no.

I would be open to OC due to his familiarity though. People don't realize that when we do show Shula the door, there is going to be an inevitable adjustment period with a new OC, and after a season like this, fan patience is going to be very low. Limiting that adjustment period as much as possible should be priority.

But right now, playcalling changes won't make up for our WR's not getting open or flat out dropping passes. Need improvement all around.

The biggest issue with our offense right now besides the offensive line is that our "#1" wr is slow and can't get separation. Seem to be a lot better when we feature Ginn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, AceBoogie said:

The biggest issue with our offense right now besides the offensive line is that our "#1" wr is slow and can't get separation. Seem to be a lot better when we feature Ginn

No disagreement that our WR's need to step it up. But last year our offensive line was adequate often enough to give our receivers real opportunities. These long developing routes behind a swiss cheese OL only amplify the deficiencies of our receivers. We have to try to put them into more advantageous opportunities to succeed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, TheRed said:

No disagreement that our WR's need to step it up. But last year our offensive line was adequate often enough to give our receivers real opportunities. These long developing routes behind a swiss cheese OL only amplify the deficiencies of our receivers. We have to try to put them into more advantageous opportunities to succeed.

Yea no doubt the offensive line is the main issue. I know people want to turn Cam into captain check down, but check downs won't win games with this defense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My tailoring green idea was not for him to be the starter but to add some value beyond just a developmental quarterback I think size speed is something Bryce doesn't have he has those and would immediately feel the fourth and one package and possibly red zone and some power packages for us
    • Do you have against Willis I believe you're around when we have the draft with corral and Willis were on the board and me personally I was banging the table for Willis as early as round one but a lot of people thought corral was better but it's amazing with a little coaching and time can do with me I always go with potential and upside versus oh the guy just plays football you know sometimes that's not enough
    • I know or needs and this probably isn't with a lot of people want but if he's available at 19 I don't think you can discount that he would be the best player on the board I think with 43 speed he's as fast as leggette. 63240 something he would stretch the field  Strike fear over the middle of opposing linebackers and also probably cure our long time history of no serviceable tight end since Greg Olsen I think a lot of needs like tackle maybe linebacker could be filled and free agency to the point like they did last year where we fix a lot of this and draft the best player we can on the board.  After his combine and the numbers in the 43-in vertical I'm not sure that he will be available but if he is I bet that he's highly considered what say you
×
×
  • Create New...