Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How in the Hell does this make sense? The Carolina Panthers are the League leaders in total sacks.


nctarheel0619

Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, Cracka McNasty said:

Gettle... magic? I guess Ealy was right when he said when the sacks come they'll come in bunches. 

For real though when we've been healthy our defense hasn't looked horrible. We haven't been able to piece together consistent solid team games throughout the season though. When the offense looks good, the defense looks bad. When the defense looks bad, the offense looks good. When offense and defense look good, special teams fails us. 

Injuries have really hurt us this season. 

Injuries aren't the reason we suck ass on the back end.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Cracka McNasty said:

Gettle... magic? I guess Ealy was right when he said when the sacks come they'll come in bunches

For real though when we've been healthy our defense hasn't looked horrible. We haven't been able to piece together consistent solid team games throughout the season though. When the offense looks good, the defense looks bad. When the defense looks bad, the offense looks good. When offense and defense look good, special teams fails us. 

Injuries have really hurt us this season. 

It still an issue that hardly any have came from him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Well, that is a function of coaching...perhaps for compensating for a weaker than normal output of the front, or just for general strategic reasons. Perhaps Ron and/or McDermott are actually doing something good (sense the sarcasm).

It's not true according to the stats

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While Ealy was starting for the first 6 games and taking a majority of the snaps as an every down DE, the Panthers registered 12 sacks.

In the next 7 games following Ealy coming off the bench and using Addison instead of Ealy in passing situations the Panthers posted 27 sacks.

As soon as the Panthers reduced Ealy's, Butler's, and Soliai's roles that they had at the beginning of the season it all came together for the DL. The Panthers went from 17th in sacks to 1st in sacks over the past 7 weeks.

Now, the Panthers just need their secondary to start making plays on defense to stop drives and create takeaways. Maybe they can get their pass defense out of the basement and into the top 20 before the season is finished.

Then the offense can go back to doing what it was built to do. Run the ball and catch the defense off guard with a big play in the passing game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, nctarheel0619 said:

Injuries aren't the reason we suck ass on the back end.  

That is specifically the reason we have sucked ass on the back end. Our secondary, while inexperienced, has been serviceable when healthy. We had a stretch of games in the middle of the season where we were on our 4th and 5th string guys at corner, and second and third at safety. That contributed significantly to the overall performance of the secondary. 

Not having Norman has been significant, but it's not the end all be all reason the defense has struggled at times. We see how competent the secondary can be when they are healthy, that just hasn't been a luxury we've had this year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CPantherKing said:

While Ealy was starting for the first 6 games and taking a majority of the snaps as an every down DE, the Panthers registered 12 sacks.

In the next 7 games following Ealy coming off the bench and using Addison instead of Ealy in passing situations the Panthers posted 27 sacks.

As soon as the Panthers reduced Ealy's, Butler's, and Soliai's roles that they had at the beginning of the season it all came together for the DL. The Panthers went from 17th in sacks to 1st in sacks over the past 7 weeks.

Now, the Panthers just need their secondary to start making plays on defense to stop drives and create takeaways. Maybe they can get their pass defense out of the basement and into the top 20 before the season is finished.

Then the offense can go back to doing what it was built to do. Run the ball and catch the defense off guard with a big play in the passing game.

Yep, this is pretty much it. The biggest thing we miss with Norman is turnovers and TO opportunities. With how inexperienced our secondary is we weren't going to create nearly as many turnovers due to the guys just being so young requiring them to think instead of react. With experience the TO's will come which will be a great thing for us moving forward. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, emhoward said:

The question is, does this still make DE a primary need going into the offseason?

For me personally I still think it's a big time need going forward. We can't depend on Addison having another career year. Plus CJ will be a year older.

Yes but not as much as keeping Cam upright. Our offense and OC has been much worse than our defense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Cracka McNasty said:

That is specifically the reason we have sucked ass on the back end. Our secondary, while inexperienced, has been serviceable when healthy. We had a stretch of games in the middle of the season where we were on our 4th and 5th string guys at corner, and second and third at safety. That contributed significantly to the overall performance of the secondary. 

Not having Norman has been significant, but it's not the end all be all reason the defense has struggled at times. We see how competent the secondary can be when they are healthy, that just hasn't been a luxury we've had this year. 

When Worley has played, he hasn't played adequate at all.  Hence the reason he gets so many tackles.  Also, Boston+Griffin have been trash.  Coleman has played out of position as well.  Like I stated, you can use injuries as your excuse.  But, the games don't lie.  The inexperience, and lack of talent back there has shown numerous times.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, csx said:

It's not true according to the stats

How's that. How are stats going to prove that Rivera and/or McDermott haven't found ways to get much needed pressue on opposing QBs. IIRC, early this season, Rivera even suggested that they may have to use the LBs and DBs to generate some sacks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, PhillyB said:

just goes to show we're really not that bad, we've just been situationally just bad enough to lose a bunch of games. a tic better and we've won 8 games.

It's more coaching than anything else. How do you collapse in the second half like this team does every game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Cracka McNasty said:

Yep, this is pretty much it. The biggest thing we miss with Norman is turnovers and TO opportunities. With how inexperienced our secondary is we weren't going to create nearly as many turnovers due to the guys just being so young requiring them to think instead of react. With experience the TO's will come which will be a great thing for us moving forward. 

The notion that the offense is bad because we aren't getting turnovers is silly.

The offense is bad on its own terms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Cracka McNasty said:

That is specifically the reason we have sucked ass on the back end. Our secondary, while inexperienced, has been serviceable when healthy. We had a stretch of games in the middle of the season where we were on our 4th and 5th string guys at corner, and second and third at safety. That contributed significantly to the overall performance of the secondary. 

Not having Norman has been significant, but it's not the end all be all reason the defense has struggled at times. We see how competent the secondary can be when they are healthy, that just hasn't been a luxury we've had this year. 

Starting guys like Bene who had poor conditioning, Zack Sanchez who seems like a dud and Michael Griffin who can't play anymore hurt the secondary. I do agree with Gettleman approach in the off-season that we needed to make a long term solution in the secondary with getting Worley and Bradberry but it hurt the team in the short term

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, CPantherKing said:

While Ealy was starting for the first 6 games and taking a majority of the snaps as an every down DE, the Panthers registered 12 sacks.

In the next 7 games following Ealy coming off the bench and using Addison instead of Ealy in passing situations the Panthers posted 27 sacks.

As soon as the Panthers reduced Ealy's, Butler's, and Soliai's roles that they had at the beginning of the season it all came together for the DL. The Panthers went from 17th in sacks to 1st in sacks over the past 7 weeks.

Now, the Panthers just need their secondary to start making plays on defense to stop drives and create takeaways. Maybe they can get their pass defense out of the basement and into the top 20 before the season is finished.

Then the offense can go back to doing what it was built to do. Run the ball and catch the defense off guard with a big play in the passing game.

I completely agree about Ealy. The guy is just better coming off the bench on the left. However, I don't know if you realize but Butler played a ton yesterday and was actually disruptive in both the passing and running game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is something that has irritated me for a while. I'm going to address his play during these "game winning drives," 8 of them apparently, clear up some nomenclature, and address some points specifically. The games in question.  Also responding to this  What is a Game Winning Drive? This is an undefined term and therefore can be whatever the person using it wants it to be. The term itself removes context from a result which lends itself to be used by people arguing in bad faith. Some people like to attribute every time Bryce is on the field in a situation like this to him "winning the game," or just kind of associating him with a "Game Winning Drive" and leaving it open ended. There's no criteria for what a GWD is. If you had a spectrum of what this could encompass it, on one end you'd have a single player being responsible, and on the other you'd have all 11. Put another way, a QB going 9/9 for 99 yards and rushing the final yard himself is on one end of the spectrum, and on the other is the blocking tight end who was just kinda there. Hey, he was on the field too.  For these purposes, I'm going to hedge and say a GWD is something you know when you see it. I'm not going to claim Bryce hasn't had one, but I'm absolutely not going to give him credit for every one of them. Reasonable people can disagree at the margins, but generally I think we'll be in accord more than not. I also want to look at the context of these, because I think we need to keep in mind how the team got to that position. There's a certain "mystique" about the term game winning drive. Like all of a sudden, when the game is on the line, the QB just turns it on and becomes a better player and blah blah blah. Nothing else matters because he Just Wins Games It neatly ignores the circumstances that led to a team needing a last second drive against some of the worst teams in the league, and this should be taken into consideration. This was an argument made in favor of Delhomme for years...until a certain game that we won't mention.  In reality, defenses are tired by the end of the game, defensive coordinators will generally give up yards in exchange for clock, and offensive playcallers will be more aggressive. That's really it.  But Fiz, why now? Why tonight? People are building this narrative about Bryce Young because it allows them to overlook the rest of his performance, his role in getting the team into whatever hole they're trying to crawl out of, and minimizing the contributions of everyone else (or assigning blame to players other than him) to make him look like he's better than he is/being let down. People in the national media with motivations I can only speculate on are doing this and it's irritating. Also it's very slow at work tonight and it's either this or reruns of ER.  I'll be looking at the final drives here (more or less) when the Panthers were in a position to win or tie. I'll also be adding some context as a I go. So lets just look at these.  2023 Houston at Carolina - 5/10 41 yds, FG  The Panthers drove to the Houston 44, then ran it 6 times in a row for the final 12 yards before the Texans started diving offsides. Panthers weren't just killing clock; Bryce had already taken one sack on the drive (six on the day!), and I don't think any of us feel like Pineiro had a 60 yarder in him in 2023. He did have 5 FG in him though, which is all the scoring the Panthers could muster. It was enough.  Game Winning Drive: eh, Bryce didn't really cover himself in glory here. If you think getting the team into range for a 60 yard attempt before letting the RB finish the job is a GWD, then we're going to have some problems. I'm generally kinda dubious of the whole "wow he set up a long range field goal for the win what a legend." Why yes early career Tom Brady was a fraud carried by Adam Vinatieri why do you ask  Atlanta at Carolina - 5/6 53 yds, GW FG Game Winning Drive: yeah, I think so. It was a miserable 9-6 win against the Desmond Ridder led Atlanta Falcons. Prior to this final drive, Bryce was a whopping 13/18 for 114 yds and the offense had managed 6 whole points. Hard for me to say here they weren't in the position to need a GWD because of how ineffective Bryce was. That said, I think it's fair he did this one on his own. Credit where credit's due little guy, you did it.  2024 New Orleans at Carolina - 1/4, 38 yds Game Winning Drive: not really. Panthers win 23-22. Sanders scored from 16 yards out on the ground, Carolina was only there because of a DPI (a theme with Bryce), Bryce took a sack on the 2 point conversion, and then the defense stopped the Saints afterwards. Prior to this Bryce had a very Bryce esque 15/22 133 1 Td 1 Int performance going so he was just kinda there.  Again, this is where context comes into play. Completing 1/4 passes does not "leading a game winning drive" make. If that's the dividing line, everyone on the field led a GWD, so the term becomes meaningless.  Carolina at Giants - 0/0  Game Winning Drive: no matter what a GWD is, it's certainly not this, and if anyone argues differently you can disregard them. Daniel Jones fumbled on the first play of overtime, Panthers ran a couple times and kicked the game winning FG. Prior to this, Bryce was terrible. Panthers were up 17-7 with 5:31 in the 3rd quarter, on the back of Chuba. From that point on, Bryce went 2/6 for 14 yards. Panthers had two 3 and outs and got just 2 first downs. Panthers overcame him here.  Arizona at Carolina - 0/0 Game Winning Drive: no. On the panthers second possession in overtime, Chuba ran it twice for 49 yards and a TD. On their first possession, Bryce completed a 1 yard checkdown, took a sack, and the Panthers punted after totaling -4 yards. Furthermore, Bryce couldn't convert a 3rd and 3 at the 2 minute warning up 3 points. Arizona got the ball back and tied the game.  Carolina at Atlanta - 5/5, 71 yards  Game Winning Drive: sure whatever have a day. For context, it's generally accepted in Atlanta sports media the defense was trying get the coordinator fired that day, which he was. I was at the game. I'm not saying the players had a conspiracy, but I'm not sure how it would look different if they did. but hey, as long as weird poo keeps happening against the Falcons, let it ride.  Miami at Carolina - 3/5, 45 yards, TD  Game Winning Drive: yes BUT. I don't want to re-litigate this. Briefly, the Dolphins have a historically bad defense, the Panthers were only trailing because of how badly Bryce played, the defense bailed the team out, and Rico was clearly the MVP. Trying to sneak this into a narrative about Bryce and his game winning drives is an attempt to hide how completely dogshit he was for most of the game. On second half drives to start, Bryce went.... 0/1 passing, took a sack, FG 2/3 passing, 18 yards, Delay of Game on Bryce, punt 2/2 passing, 16 yards, took a sack, punt  1/3 passing, 4 yards, punt  1/1 passing, 4 yds, 2 defensive penalties, 43 yd run by Rico, 1 yd TD run Absolutely dismal performance Dallas at Carolina - 3/6, 25 yards, FG  Game Winning Drive: Panthers had 34 yards rushing on this drive, and Rico rushed for more yards on the day than Bryce threw. People will want to point to the 7 yard slant to Renfrow, but that's one moment. Why do you need a 4th down conversion to kick a game winning FG against the worst defense in the league? The Renfrow catch is just as meaningful as the DPI (again) on 3rd and 7. Hard for me to say yeah Bryce gets credit for this and Rico doesn't. or Ryan Fitzgerald. People aren't going to be telling stories about where they were when Bryce got 25 yards passing to set up a 30 yard FG to beat the worst defense in the league.  Conclusion I'd say low end 3, high end 6 for what I'd actually credit Bryce for with having a game winning drive. Absolutely not for the Giants and Cardinals game. Saints game probably not.  As far as questioning which games need a GWD because of Bryce, I'd argue Miami, New York, 2023 Atlanta, and Houston definitely. League average QB play and you don't need the heroics. Bryce had multiple chances to seal the game against the Cardinals in 2024 and couldn't do it. The defense picked off the Cardinals late in the 4th quarter at their 11 yard line after the Panthers went 3 and out, including a classic Bryce check down short of the line to gain on 3rd.  About half of the time, it looks like these GWD, whomever is responsible for them, are happening in part because of what Bryce did or didn't do. I don't think league average QB play is too much to ask for. Panthers usually win these games despite of Bryce; he's an obstacle to be overcome.  Stats Taken in totality, in these situations Bryce's stats are  7 games 17/26 passing for 233, 1 TD  65% completion rating  13 ypc 8.9 ypa I'm not going to compare this to league average, I'm just going to point out you'd expect someone with 8 GWD to have more than 1 TD.  Other side of this  but what about the games in a similar situation where they DIDN'T win? Shouldn't we look at those games too? Maybe find ones where Bryce absolutely lost the game with a pick, or calling an audible into the wrong play, or spiking the ball with zero seconds on the clock after throwing into the middle of the field, or all of the turnover on downs? Maybe also go into some of the games that have been mythologized, like the Eagles game that ended on a turnover on downs where Bryce had 3rd and 4 in Eagles territory and couldn't get a first down? Yeah...someone should do that...
    • Best RB tandem in Panther history (at least for a few weeks)
×
×
  • Create New...