Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Can't wait for Gettlemens end of the year presser.


chknwing

Recommended Posts

I hope we get his presser soon.  Its gonna be fun to see our local reporters try to beat him into dust over the clusterfug that was the 2016 season.  What do you think his responses will be to these statements?

You removed Normans franchise tag and drafted 3 CB's.  And the secondary was awful.

You rolled the dice on a very thin offensive line and Cam paid the price for it. 

As desperate as this team was in need for a DE you drafted a DT that hardly played.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, truthjuice said:

Missed opportunities?

wait, that's Ron's line. 

I don't think he will answer any of the questions straightforward or without basically pointing the finger back to the coaches and players. He's not gonna hold himself accountable. 

he might he completly flip flopped his drafting BPA strategy to drafting for need with 3 CB's.  Who knows what he will do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, chknwing said:

I hope we get his presser soon.  Its gonna be fun to see our local reporters try to beat him into dust over the clusterfug that was the 2016 season.  What do you think his responses will be to these statements?

You removed Normans franchise tag and drafted 3 CB's.  And the secondary was awful.

You rolled the dice on a very thin offensive line and Cam paid the price for it. 

As desperate as this team was in need for a DE you drafted a DT that hardly played.

 

IMG_0579.GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He might comment how we struggled in the beginning of the year, but now the secondary is showing up and paying off.

He'll comment on the fact that there are issues that need to be addressed. He'll probably even admit that going in with rookies in the secondary was going to be a rough ride.

 He won't say much, and just let his work speak for itself. If he drafts well, and scavenges free agency well (he won't need to spend all that much tbh), then we got a superbowl competitive team next season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Promethean Forerunner said:

- The secondary was inexperienced, not awful. The defensive line was awful (outside Star and Addison). Our rookies didn't stand much of a chance. Since Game 1 however, Bradberry has proven that he is a stud in the making and Worley is a fine #2. 

- Thin OL? We lost Kalil, Gino, Oher, and Williams in a short span. Whenever you lose a starter and his back up, that's not a depth issue. That's just bad fugging luck. Grow up you whiny bitches.

- No, we weren't desperate for a DE. We figured that Johnson was just injured all last season and Ealy would blossom into an elite DE due to his performance last season on limited snaps.

 

If our secondary was bad then there are no words to describe the play of the offense, including QB.

*interception Carolina has the ball at the 15(goes backwards and kicks a FG)* -damn that secondary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, chknwing said:

I hope we get his presser soon.  Its gonna be fun to see our local reporters try to beat him into dust over the clusterfug that was the 2016 season.  What do you think his responses will be to these statements?

You removed Normans franchise tag and drafted 3 CB's.  And the secondary was awful.

You rolled the dice on a very thin offensive line and Cam paid the price for it. 

As desperate as this team was in need for a DE you drafted a DT that hardly played.

Hillarious if you think this media is going to ask anything controversial. It took them over a week to ask Ron about the Rams job. Person and Newton aren't capable of putting a coherent controversial sentence together and Voth is more concerned about getting his one on one interview with Gettleman every year than ruffling any feathers.

I do not think he was anything great, but the Charlotte media took a huge hit when it lost Jones. At least he was intelligent and could ask questions. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

- The secondary was inexperienced, not awful. The defensive line was awful (outside Star and Addison). Our rookies didn't stand much of a chance. Since Game 1 however, Bradberry has proven that he is a stud in the making and Worley is a fine #2. 

- Thin OL? We lost Kalil, Gino, Oher, and Williams in a short span. Whenever you lose a starter and his back up, that's not a depth issue. That's just bad fugging luck. Grow up you whiny bitches.

- No, we weren't desperate for a DE. We figured that Johnson was just injured all last season and Ealy would blossom into an elite DE due to his performance last season on limited snaps.

 



Leading the league in sacks hardly constitutes an awful defensive line

Sent from my SM-N920V using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Call me crazy but if you’re in the bottom 7 in efficiency using Zone 84% of the time why not try something else? You paid Jaycee top 5 CB money use him more effectively. Zone is only efficient if you can generate a good pass rush to force a QB into mistakes otherwise you will get picked apart
    • Good Lord this board has become a cesspool of negativity and where fandom becomes something twisted and unrecognizable.  
    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
×
×
  • Create New...