Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Gas On The Fire: Bill Voth Says - With Gun Pointed To Head - McCaffrey Likely Pick


Saca312

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Shocker said:

I think we are going to take DE...which means Barnett.  Weak, but that will happen...even with the RBs on the board.

 

take a DE only if it is Thomas @ 8... too many better choices to go with Barnett at that spot...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Doc Holiday said:

To those that want McCaffery, all I have to say is he is a white version Reggie Bush thats a little less talented.  Reggie Bush was the greatest College player that I've ever seen, now he's been a good pro, but never a great one and has been on 5 different teams in 11 seasons. Fournette could be a Great running back, and I want greatness!

All that talent won't mean poo if our o-line isn't fixed. We still have 2 huge question marks on the edges. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, thomas96 said:

Did the Pats take their utility running backs in the top 10? First round? You're crazy if you think we're taking a utility player in the top 10. A guy who can carry an offense on his back and grind out tough yards, score TDs, break long game changing runs, and pass protect like Fournette? Sure. But not a gadget player.

If they think that player gives the team a better chance to win a superbowl then yes. I personally don't. I hope they don't draft him.. but if they did, the reasons in my previous post would be why. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Saca312 said:

Would hope not. Would be a very terrible decision honestly, based on the fact there's so much value at that TE position in this deep draft while we could get a much better player ahead.

Saca, the position doesn't matter. Do you not understand that? You take the BPA! If Howard is the BPA, then picking him is the best move. You don't pick an inferior player at another position because you think you can hedge your bets later with someone who is not the best. Take the BPA in the first, the second, the third, the fourth, and if you want to get "cute," do so on day three.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am just NOT expecting Fournette or Thomas to be available.  Adams is a long shot as well.  

It's pretty much in my mind we are getting OJ Howard or McCaffrey...or making moves.  

Honest---I think we'd draft McCaffrey over J. Allen tbqf.  I remember loving Elway to Ed and Rod with Terrell at RB growing up and Ed's son could be a really cool pairing with Cam on offense.  Use him as our slot and get those underneath throws from shotgun with Stewart next to Cam.  Use him in the shotgun at RB.  Use him returning punts.  

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Promethean Forerunner said:

Who says Howard is BPA? I don't view him as BPA. It's a poo choice. If I had to choose between McCaffrey or Howard, I'd choose McCaffrey in a heartbeat. You guys are basing too much on Howard from his National Championship games and his combine performance. 

If Thomas, Adams, Hooker, Allen, Garrett, and Fournette are gone, then the next logical move is to trade back and draft Njoku or Peppers. 

We won't know who the BPA is obviously until the draft. If you believe Igo, then there is absolutely a scenario where Howard will be the BPA. 

I don't judge these guys based on anything really. I research information from many many sources and form an opinion from there. The thing is, these sources know much more than I do. Admittedly they're not perfect, but that's why I don't take one man's word and run with it, but listen to several (like Gil Brandt, Greg Cosell, Mike Mayock, Daniel Jeremiah, Bucky Brooks, etc.), as well as attempt to read between the lines of Dave Gettleman's words, and reconcile it all with his philosophy. 

Even after all that, I don't presume to know more than he does, and on day one he hasn't missed yet as far as I'm concerned (though the jury is still out on Butler, but I can see him working out).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Doc Holiday said:

But I'm not wrong am I?

It's hard to say. Fournette could be a total NFL flop. It happens. I think McC has an exceptional ability if he's used in the right system. I see him more in the mold of a Leveon Bell than AP because of his receiving ability but it's going to take a creative OC to let him shine. I'm not sure Shula is that guy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Doc Holiday said:

To those that want McCaffery, all I have to say is he is a white version Reggie Bush thats a little less talented.  Reggie Bush was the greatest College player that I've ever seen, now he's been a good pro, but never a great one and has been on 5 different teams in 11 seasons. Fournette could be a Great running back, and I want greatness!

I would tend to agree. Many draft experts have McCaffrey's comp being Bryant Westbrook. He was good, not great. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd be fine with him at 8 but only if Fournette and Solomon Thomas are not available.

Look at it this way; I believe Gman has McCaffrey rated higher than OJ Howard, Derek Barnett and David Njoku. So he will see McCaffrey as the best player available at 8. We would NOT be reaching here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In before: "XL sucks, there is no hope." "As long as we have Bryce, none of this matters." My response: "It's X, not XL...we're not discussing apparel sizes, or we'd have to consider XS."  
    • Alain Pierre provides some food for thought on Last Word On Sports regarding Xavier Legette, and his article, though specifically on X, kind of puts me in the mind of QBs being overdrafted and put into situations that they're not prepared for, some ultimately failing due to drafting missteps by front offices who don't necessarily view prospective players within the contextual importance that situations demand.  At this point, Legette looks like a failure in reference to expectations, of not only what a consistently productive NFL receiver looks like, but a first round pick (which he obviously should never have been). But the story on X isn't necessarily completely over. Damn. I seem to be experiencing deja vu...It wasn't X's fault that he was overdrafted, that was a choice by an FO that obviously downplayed actual realized skill vs outstanding measurables and upside. Sure, the FO was impressed by X's one-year feats during his senior season at South Carolina, but it was the NFL god, RAS (a.k.a. Raw Athletic Score), that had Dave Canales's and Dan Morgan's jaws dropping in amazement at the sight of X running around in underwear at the Combine...   "At 6-foot-3 and over 220 pounds, Legette brought rare athletic upside to the position. His breakout season at South Carolina showed flashes of dominance that NFL teams dream of. Projecting forward, many scouts compared his physical profile to D.K. Metcalf, and the Panthers clearly believed they could develop him into a true wide receiver 1 over time. The issue was never his talent. The issue was the timeline. Just a few picks later, the Chargers selected Ladd McConkey, a receiver who may have lacked Xavier Legette’s physical ceiling but entered the league far more technically refined. McConkey immediately showed advanced route discipline, leverage awareness, good pacing, and separation ability.  Bryce Young’s game has always depended on timing and anticipation. His best football at Alabama came with receivers capable of winning through precision rather than pure athleticism. Jameson Williams and John Metchie III were excellent route runners and were able to get drafted in 2022. McConkey naturally fit that style of play. Legette, meanwhile, needed significant development in the exact areas where Bryce Young needed help. The Panthers drafted traits when Bryce Young needed reliability."   Yes, the FO was guilty. The good thing is that the execs appear to be improving. Some of that may be attributed to the hiring of Eric Eager (who was hired right after the Xavier Legette draft). Eager seems to have helped the Panthers FO fine-tune their analytical progress, and, at least on paper, they acquired players with a lot of value during the last draft in regards to actually (what I'll refer to as) "underdrafting" talent relative to their position with value already built in.  Look at Chris Brazzell: He may be more of the quintessential project receiver who was arguably more or less just as raw as Legette was when he was drafted, and with a relatively high RAS as well. The notable difference is value, as Brazzell was a round three pick and Legette was a first rounder.    "Unlike the Xavier Legette situation, Carolina’s environment for Brazzell is completely different. "The Panthers are not asking a raw receiver prospect to stabilize this offense for Bryce Young. "Brazzell enters a much healthier developmental situation with far less pressure. With Tetairoa McMillan established as the primary target and Jalen Coker continuing to settle as the number 2 option...Xavier Legette, Metchie III, and Jimmy Horn Jr. are also still in this rotation, fighting for reps. "It gives Carolina something they failed to give Legette when they drafted him: A developmental runway. "Xavier Legette entered the league with expectations attached to a first-round pick and an offense desperate for answers. Brazzell enters a room where he can spend a year working on his route running, learning the playbook, and earning snaps gradually rather than being asked to become part of Bryce Young’s solution immediately. "And truthfully, Brazzell needs that time coming out of college. Despite his elite physical tools, many evaluators have several concerns about his overall polish as a receiver. "His route tree at Tennessee was viewed as fairly limited due to the type of offense that they run. The receivers are expected to run a lot of choice routes, which are dictated by the placement of the defenders. It doesn’t require technical route-running and an understanding of the playbook needed at the NFL level...   "Context changes significantly when expectations change. "The Panthers are not depending on Brazzell to save the offense. They can allow him to develop slowly, expand his route tree, improve his technical refinement, and learn behind a much more stable receiver room... "Traits become much easier to bet on when patience is built into the plan."   It's all about understanding your situation. I don't agree that it's an inherently difficult choice like the author is suggesting in the following excerpt. At the very least, I think that it should be easier as long as all parties involved stay levelheaded and true to their process.    "That is what makes these draft decisions so difficult. "Every front office believes it can find the next Metcalf, Owens, or Marshall. Sometimes they do. More often, they are betting on a development path that may take years to complete. "The challenge is understanding what your offense needs right now. "If a team has patience, stability, and a quarterback capable of carrying the offense while a receiver develops, betting on traits can make sense. But if a young quarterback needs immediate help, there is a strong argument for prioritizing the receiver who already knows how to separate, create throwing , and earn trust from day one. "That’s why the Xavier Legette-Ladd McConkey debate remains so fascinating. "It was never really a discussion about talent. It was a discussion about timing."   For me, Ladd McConkey was talented enough in his own right, that the gap--the upside--was never as big as people are suggesting between not only McConkey and Legette, but McConkey and other receivers drafted in the first round during that draft. The technique divide between Ladd and X was pretty stark though, as was the roughly 35 pounds, but the speed was identical, the maybe 1½ height difference isn't huge (6' and 6'1"), and it may surprise some that Ladd's RAS (9.34) was also enough to put him in the top 10 percent of receivers since 1987. There is an argument that he would've been a better pick for Bryce and the Panthers, regardless of timeline and talent. But, I still appreciate the thesis (if you will) of the article, as it still provides some hope--perhaps a glimmer at this point, that X's RAS may finally translate to the NFL given more time, but, perhaps more importantly, it explains how Dan Morgan and company are showing improvement, even if it appears somewhat understated. My hope is that continued improvement is palpable by this time next year. https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2026/05/30/xavier-legette-draft-lessons/#google_vignette        
    • Won’t stop until people stop buying overpriced poo.
×
×
  • Create New...