Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why have I started hearing more Reuben Foster to the Panthers chatter this week?


Sam Mills Fan

Recommended Posts

Honestly, I think they are starting to run out of things to talk about.

If we were to do so, it would mean they don't have confidence in the long term viability of our LBs.  I think there are WAY better picks than Foster, but I'm just a moron with a keyboard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, sanjay_rajput said:

We could get the best RB in class and who is far more talented 

Fournette could possibly go to the 49ers, jags , or jets before us . There's plenty of nightmare senarios with no qbs taken in the top 7 and all the blue chips go off the board before we pick  , probably leaving us with mccaffey , cook, Howard , Barnett , foster , Corey Davis to choose from 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Hoenheim said:

Fournette could possibly go to the 49ers, jags , or jets before us . There's plenty of nightmare senarios with no qbs taken in the top 7 and all the blue chips go off the board before we pick  , probably leaving us with mccaffey , cook, Howard , Barnett , foster , Corey Davis to choose from 

 

Even then Foster shouldn't not be on the board for Panthers . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, d-dave said:

Honestly, I think they are starting to run out of things to talk about.

If we were to do so, it would mean they don't have confidence in the long term viability of our LBs.  I think there are WAY better picks than Foster, but I'm just a moron with a keyboard.

That's never stopped anyone else on here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we draft him, then that tells me we have serious concerns about Kuechly going forward and that would seriously bum me out. Concerns (well founded concerns at that) about another elite MLB played a big role in us drafting Kuechly.

But, if we have major concerns with Kuechly, I think we just need to admit we're snake bitten with elite young MLBs and role with JAGs there. I don't want to mention the names, but Panthers fans know them. Let's please not add Kuechly to that list.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, tiger7_88 said:

So your hypothetical answer to questions about Luke's "head" is to replace him with a player shown to be even more prone to concussion while in college?

http://www.cincinnati.com/story/sports/nfl/bengals/2017/03/02/nfl-draft-prospect-concussion-concerns/98603840/

"University of Alabama linebacker Reuben Foster, for example, is a player considered as a top 10 talent in the upcoming draft. But he suffered at least two documented concussions with the Crimson Tide, in a 2016 game and in a scrimmage in 2014. AL.com also reported Foster suffered “stingers” outside of those concussions."

I've said before and I'll say it again, Foster is a great talent.  But if you've watched him play, he's a head-down tackler and that is what creates his concussion/stinger problems.

Oh lord, this sounds like that former Miami Hurricane tackling machine all over again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have good depth at LB, so I doubt we'd be seriously interested. Mayo, Cash and Norris are quality football players. More importantly, I just don't see Foster being the BPA, particularly if a team or two in the top 7 is crazy enough to reach for a QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm just having a hard time buying the Foster hype. He has marginal size and speed for an NFL LB and he was surrounded by other NFL talent on that Bama defense. Then there's the fact that he got booted from the combine for an incident with a medical professional.

I'm just not seeing the love affair with this guy. Take him out of a defense where the talent level is head and shoulders above the competition and is he still a special player? I'm not so sure about that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mjligon said:

90% of the Huddle will be on suicide watch if this happens.

 

1 hour ago, Cyclonus said:

That would be fine with me.  T.D isn't getting any younger and we just don't know about Luke's head at this point going forward.

im on both sides of this coin. i would hate the pick, but also totally understand why it makes sense

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's honestly pretty interesting just seeing this pairing play out. Canales’ offenses (Seattle, Tampa) are run-first, under-center, play-action systems built around defined reads and intermediate/deep timing throws. That structure worked when he had QBs like Baker Mayfield or Russell Wilson in a system that created clear launch points and sightlines. His success has always been tied to a credible run game + play-action gravity. You can see that with the Panthers team building philosophy as well. Coker and TMac both are bigger receivers that won't get the best YAC production but thrive as possession receivers in contested scenarios. They're not the best in space and creating additional yardage in such, and would likely fair better systematically with a stronger armed QB who can create better opportunities on those boundary 1v1 matchups with stronger throws. Bryce, on the other hand, is a spread-native QB. His strengths are rhythm, spacing, quick processing, and off-script creation. Asking him to live in condensed formations with long-developing play-action concepts just hasn't been his forte. And well, his boundary throws are limited in velocity which takes a big chunk of the playbook off. And I mean a QB like Bryce can still work, it's just Dave's offensive philosophy and foundation is very much at odds with Young's physical limits and his own experience. So it's certainly still a learning experience for Dave to figure out how he can mesh his offensive philosophy with Young's strengths. He's very inexperienced with maximizing Bryce's strengths with his system. Would love to see us bring in an OC with spread experience and adaptability to implement a cohesive system with Dave to allow Bryce to thrive, as it's obvious we're sticking with him for a bit longer.   
    • Only thing I really agreed with is questioning why we didn’t take any timeouts on their last drive.  I know hindsight is 20/20, but I think it would’ve saved clock bc they were desperate to score as soon as the opportunity presented itself, but I also think it could’ve helped the defense regroup and maybe give us a better chance to stop them.
×
×
  • Create New...