Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Does anyone buy Gettleman's BPA nonsense


Panthero

Recommended Posts

38 minutes ago, panther4life said:

In today's PC he explained/admitted last year was an exception to this philosophy or rule but noted he stayed true to grades and took Butler instead of reaching for a corner in the first. 

Oh ok. I missed the presser at work today so I only got some highlights

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Panthero said:

If you don't somewhat address the roster you have then you end up with last year. I'm not saying reach, but if you have a high first round grade on a cah'nah and a runningback do you really take the corner because you grade him a '90' and the running back a '89'? I am skeptical of this. 

download.jpg

download (1).jpg

download (2).jpg

You absolutely go bpa. If not, using your example above , after a few years you end up with a team full of 77 players. Having said that, I'm sure everybody fudges a little but by going bpa most of the time you can get away with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you buy into BPA, and, you think there are 6 or so good picks that will probably go before 8, then you have to be willing to trade down.  BPA at 8 might be the same as BPA at 15, so why not pick up the early third or late second?

Let a couple QB's go before us and we are golden, until then, I like the trade down and THEN BPA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, frash.exe said:

do we have a quota of DAE THINK GETTLEMAN SUCKS threads we need to meet every week?

who said he sucks, precious? i love gettleman, just think hes full of beans on this one. in closing, your momma's a snow blower.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, yasuhara2241 said:

BPA is based off their draft board which is based off of potential, need, immediate impact, etc. For me it's just a fancy word to not share too much. Every team drafting say they took their highest rated player.

Sent using the amazing CarolinaHuddle mobile app
 

Agreed.  If BPA is a quarterback, we aren't taking him.  If BPA is a linebacker, we might take him to replace TD in a few years.  If BPA is a running back or DE, we take him.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, frash.exe said:

do we have a quota of DAE THINK GETTLEMAN SUCKS threads we need to meet every week?

I don't think he sucks; in fact, I think he's a great GM.  but BPA is an ambiguous term.  see my post at the top of page 2.  it's smart business, because it can mean whatever he wants it to mean.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I want the following: LB - Devin Lloyd (our big money splash) I'm also interested in Nakobe Dean if we go the cheaper route. His size is a concern beside Wallace, but Dean is a Dan Morgan type of alpha leader of the defense. He's often called the heart of the Philly defense and would absolutely bring a swagger and be our field general on defense. We need this so badly and I'd almost rather go with him because Wallace is no guarantee to ever hit his potential, so maybe we go with Dean and find a Wallace replacement in on day 2. EDGE - Boye Mafe (SEA) I think he's a great blend of pass rush prowess, age and experience. We have our potential youngsters in Scourton and Umanmielen, let's add a vet from a successful franchise to bring some heat. Bye bye Wonnum....bye bye Jones. We roll with Mafe-Scourton-Umanmielen TE - Cade Otton (TB) Again, we have youth in this position w/ Sanders and Evans. Sanders is tracking similarly to Ian Thomas (age/stats) and wonder if he will ever be the TE we thought we stole in the 4th round. Evans looks legit, but more of a balanced/blocker. Sign Otton, who Dave is familiar with and save some money by cutting Tremble. Also allows us to roll Otton-Sanders-Evans in 13 personnel WR - Wan'dale Robinson or Rashid Shaheed I wonder if either of these will be priced out of our range based on age and what they bring. We do already have a 5'8" WR with Horn, Jr. so I'd see the argument against Robinson. However, the latter is still only 25 and just hit a 1k yard receiving season with suspect QB play in NY and an elite talent in Nabers on the roster. SEA gave up two '26 draft picks for Shaheed and he has stepped in nicely for the 'Hawks...doubt they let him walk. I also saw Doubs on the FA list and wonder if he'd be what we need. We need a separator that can be a deep threat to keep defenses honest. TMac/Coker are the bigger receivers, but not necesarily guys that scare a defense....would Doubs be that guy? SAF I'd like an upgrade here and wonder if we wait out the FA period until the latter stages if someone like Ar'Darious Washington or Jaylinn Hawkins lingers and there's a discount later in the game. Nick Scott can F off and I hope he never suits up for us again.   
    • I just can’t see Morgan as being under the threat of unemployment at any time this upcoming season.  As little as ‘winning’ the division and making the playoffs impressed me, I think to Tepper it was like nectar of the Gods. A milestone for him. And the team did play well in the Wild Card. That has to buy him 2027. I would think. Unless we start 0-8 or something. Which I don’t believe will happen. 
    • I'm not arguing that Linderbaum isn't a better player than Mays, just that the difference isn't as much as people might think. At least not compared to the difference in cost between the two players will be. In any event, I don't expect the Ravens to let him get to the open market.
×
×
  • Create New...