Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is the imminent Atlanta "biggest choke in history" Hangover real?


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Had a chance to speak with some media types over the weekend who are pretty impartial. Helps me calibrate my own perceptions a bit. Topic of the Falcons hangover came up. I figured it may just be something Panthers folks like to imagine being real. Turns out, everyone believes it. We saw first hand the type of weird hangover a Superbowl loss brought on. Imagine the feeling being 10x worse as it has to be with the Falcons. 

 

Is the Falcons hangover a real thing that will definitely happen, or is it silly superstition? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I defiantly think there's some merit to it. They lost 8 total coaches, that's a lot of turnover especially with Shanahan the architect of that offense now gone. I also don't think all 5 starting offensive lineman stay healthy 2years in a row. I mean They had 1 starting combination of OL the entire year last year. That is crazy fortunate. I don't expect them to fall to trash like some on here but 9-7, 8-8 maybe 7-9. That's just hard to get over a loss like that.

Sent using the amazing CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't discount the fact that they are very talented on defense, and they had the no. 1 offense in the league last year for a reason. Even with KS gone, the personnel is still pretty much intact.

With that being said, I don't think they'll be the team they were last year. 9-7 is my prediction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, The Huddler said:

I think its real

 

theres a legit history of superbowl losers having a slump the next season. That is fact. 

 

Add in how the falcons lost...  you have a recipe for disaster.. 

 

lost their OC and DC too   

 

Yeah, it's extremely difficult to get back to the Super Bowl after being in it the year before.  The Seahawks have been to the Playoffs recently though.  They're the outlier.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, TNPanther said:

I wouldn't discount the fact that they are very talented on defense, and they had the no. 1 offense in the league last year for a reason. Even with KS gone, the personnel is still pretty much intact.

With that being said, I don't think they'll be the team they were last year. 9-7 is my prediction.

I think injuries will be key.  I think they have some big injuries this year.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's just luck.

We were super lucky in 15, and the exact opposite in 16.

Your starting tackle gets rolled up game 1....not good.

Best player on defense tears an ACL or achilles....same thing.

 

It's often not the best team that wins the damn thing, it's the luckiest/healthiest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see it, honestly.  They get to open with the Bears, and then play the Packers at home and the Lions on the road.  1-2 is believable, and if that happens everyone and their brother will be trotting out the hangover narrative.  But the next four games are against the AFC East, and they should win them all except the one in New England.  They will hit the middle of their season at around 4-4 and I think they finish 8-8 or 9-7.  This is a team that lost five games last year, but they got hot at the right time.  They got those 11 wins due to a string of luck and good football, and they will be good again next year.

For what it's worth, here are the records for Super Bowl losers for the past 10 years.

  • 2007 Bears went from 13-3 to 7-9
  • 2008 Patriots went from 16-0 to 11-5 (Injuries, mainly)
  • 2009 Cardinals went from 9-7 to 10-6
  • 2010 Colts went from 14-2 to 10-6
  • 2011 Steelers went from 12-4 to 12-4
  • 2012 Patriots went from 13-3 to 12-4
  • 2013 49ers went from 11-4-1 to 12-4
  • 2014 Broncos went from 13-3 to 12-4
  • 2015 Seahawks went from 12-4 to 10-6
  • 2016 Panthers went from 15-1 to 6-10

I don't think the hangover is a guaranteed thing.  We just want it to be because we had one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Cyberjag said:

 

  • 2007 Bears went from 13-3 to 7-9
  • 2008 Patriots went from 16-0 to 11-5 (Injuries, mainly)
  • 2009 Cardinals went from 9-7 to 10-6
  • 2010 Colts went from 14-2 to 10-6
  • 2011 Steelers went from 12-4 to 12-4
  • 2012 Patriots went from 13-3 to 12-4
  • 2013 49ers went from 11-4-1 to 12-4
  • 2014 Broncos went from 13-3 to 12-4
  • 2015 Seahawks went from 12-4 to 10-6
  • 2016 Panthers went from 15-1 to 6-10

Thanks, party pooper. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was playing around with the ESPN playoff predictor and it shows if 49ers and Rams finish with same record, the Rams hold the tiebreaker.     
    • This is my thinking as well. Seattle played as good as they could on defense and Panthers still had a chance until those back to back turnovers.  I don't think the Rams played particularly well in their game against us, alot things went our way in order to win.  Someone pointed out the Rams were bad on the east coast road games and Seattle has been the better road team but they just fought a hard contested game against the Panthers, and now they travel to San Fran this week for their biggest game of the season to determine the division and if they are the overall #1 seed in the NFC or will be traveling for the Wildcard weekend.  If they lose they then travel back cross the country to play a team they've just beaten two weeks ago, not saying they won't be favored against the Panthers but the energy of hosting our first playoff game in 10 years along with the get back effect of having just lost to this team could be huge. 
    • I don’t know about shadowing and all that, but according to this, whatever we are doing is working 
×
×
  • Create New...