Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panther fans who still hold a fondness for Ric Flair

tiger7_88

By tiger7_88,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Ivan The Awesome Mentor

Ivan The Awesome

Posted
Posted

Funny how he mentions Josh Norman and insinuates that he left because he didn't want to cover Julio Jones twice a year. Then proceeds to say no one Cam cover him. News flash Ric,  Josh covered him and he never had a good game against him. Goes to show the guy talks but doesn't know what he's talking about.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
t96 Grand Master

t96

Posted
Posted

From '11 to '13 Cap did cover Julio a fair amount, not a ton or shadowing him all game, but a fair amount. And he never really got beat badly at all. Major James and the Captain will have no problems with Julio this year. Ric Flair is irrelevant to me, he should stick to fake wrestling because he's shown he knows nothing about football.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
t96 Grand Master

t96

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Ivan The Awesome said:

Funny how he mentions Josh Norman and insinuates that he left because he didn't want to cover Julio Jones twice a year. Then proceeds to say no one Cam cover him. News flash Ric,  Josh covered him and he never had a good game against him. Goes to show the guy talks but doesn't know what he's talking about.  

Josh loves playing guys like Julio, and he shut Julio down consistently every game he started against the Falcons. Still hope to see Josh back in a Panthers jersey down the line, like Captain coming back this year. Would bet Washington cuts him before the end of that contract and there's a possibility he could come back here after getting paid elsewhere. He belongs here, and he and the team know it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      Okay, now face the facta guyd

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • ForJimmy
      JJ Jansen on tanking

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
    • HaricotVert
      Potential changes to playoff seeding

      By HaricotVert · Posted

      I dont buy the idea that it would create more competitive games Given this: Seed Current Format Record Proposed Open Seeding Record 1 Lions 15–2 Lions 15–2 2 Eagles 14–3 Eagles 14–3 3 Buccaneers 10–7 Vikings 14–3 4 Rams 10–7 Commanders 12–5 5 Vikings 14–3 Rams 10–7 6 Commanders 12–5 Buccaneers 10–7 7 Packers 11–6 Packers 11–6 That would mean Wild Card round would have been Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Vikings(14/3) v Bucs(10/7) Commanders(12/5) v Rams(10/7) Instead of Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Bucs(10/7) v Commanders(12/5) Rams(10/7) v Vikings(14/3) Then with the reseed it would mean that highest remaining seed would always draw the lowest remaining team.
×
×
  • Create New...