Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

ESPN: How will Christian McCaffrey change how teams prepare for Panthers?


beastson

Recommended Posts

Quote

Jenna Laine, Tampa Bay Buccaneers reporter: McCaffrey is a fascinating player because he offers so much more than a traditional "I" running back. Bucs coach Dirk Koetter said that he "put on a clinic running routes at the combine." He's a chess piece that you can line up all over the field, with his best attributes on display in space. His ability to change direction will put extra pressure on Bucs linebackers Kwon Alexander and Lavonte David, but it could also mean some shuffling of the defensive line. The Bucs vowed to get better against the run this season, which is why they re-signed William Gholston and Sealver Siliga and drafted Stevie Tu'ikolovatu. Given McCaffrey's shiftiness, I could also see a smaller, more athletic defensive end in Noah Spence lining up to stop him. I think they're best served lining up primarily in their base defense. Fellow Panthers rookie Curtis Samuel will be an exceptionally dangerous and versatile player and might do even more damage than McCaffrey because he's just so explosive.

Vaughn McClure, Atlanta Falcons reporter: I spoke with Falcons tight end Austin Hooper about his former Stanford teammate prior to the draft and Hooper said, "On third down, he'll be a nightmare for any linebacker. I don't think there's a linebacker in this league that can cover him consistently for a full game." From the Falcons' perspective, they certainly hope the speed they now have at linebacker with Deion Jones, De'Vondre Campbell and rookie Duke Riley will help the defense keep up with versatile running backs such as McCaffrey. Falcons coach Dan Quinn believes in his defensive scheme, now presided over by energetic first-time coordinator and former Carolina player Marquand Manuel. The Falcons have better players to carry out the scheme, including newcomer Dontari Poe, a versatile defensive tackle who has the athleticism and quickness to help slow down guys such as McCaffrey in the running game. I don't see the Falcons changing up what they do just because a talented new back is now in the division. The goal will remain to stop the run first, and pressure Newton while keeping him from extending plays. The Falcons must also be sure tacklers so a player like McCaffrey doesn't pick up extra yards after the catch or after contact.

Mike Triplett, New Orleans Saints reporter: Defensive coordinator Dennis Allen said the Saints will probably learn more about how the Panthers' plan to use McCaffrey in the first two weeks of the season, prior to their Week 3 matchup. But obviously they expect McCaffrey to be used in that same type of versatile "joker back" role that the Saints have reserved for guys like Darren Sproles and Reggie Bush. Both Allen and Saints safety Kenny Vaccaro agreed McCaffrey will bring an element to Carolina's offense that hasn't really been present in the past. Vaccaro said Carolina's offense is already unique, meaning this will add another wrinkle and another type of mismatch, but he also pointed out that the Panthers will have to figure out how to be unpredictable with McCaffrey. "Besides the fact that he's gonna be a mismatch for linebackers, it might make some things easier because when he's on the field in certain spots, you know the ball's coming to him," Vaccaro said. "Sometimes it tells the defense, ‘Hey, this is what they like to do when Christian's here.' Is he in the stack, is he in the slot, is he stacking the tackle about to get out? Now, whether you can defend it or not (is a different story). And I'm sure they'll be creative because their offense is so creative."

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Hogmolliesmaht said:

So the Saints DC says our offense is creative and unique but our fans know that it's not because Shula sucks. Who is more believable?

Maybe the ones that have seen his play calls every game for the past 4 seasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Hogmolliesmaht said:

So the Saints DC says our offense is creative and unique but our fans know that it's not because Shula sucks. Who is more believable?

I'm not entirely on one side or the other but I will say with how bad the Aints D has been recently I'm not so sure that the Aints DC is the right person to ask...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Hogmolliesmaht said:

So the Saints DC says our offense is creative and unique but our fans know that it's not because Shula sucks. Who is more believable?

I'd trust the homeless guy that lives in the Super Domes dumpster over a Saints DC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So all the Falcons could come up with is "oh hur dur we won't change much because our linebackers r supah fast," they got reality coming for them real quick.

Option football is something you have to be ready for. Panthers have potential to create mismatches and misdirection on every play. Just because you have "supa fast linebackers" doesn't mean you can be fine with just sitting there and doing the same thing with the Panthers offense. It's effectively a game of chess where Panthers put you in check right before the snap. 

I probably will sound like a Shula apologist, but he never had the tools like he does this year that actually suit well for a short passing game. Considering that, I think I could forgive him a little bit for not being able to do much last year or years before. However, now he has the weapons to not only add some short passes, but weapons that will thrive with option football.

Shula has no excuses now if this offense falls flat.

These defensive coordinators have a lot more on their plate than ever. If they don't try to change much, they're gonna be in a lot of trouble.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Promethean Forerunner said:

Wait wait wait... isn't this a DC from one of the worst defensive cores in the league? Yeahhhh..

In addition, 95% of NFL coaches aren't fans. They're not going to outright say that a certain coach is terrible or mediocre. That's classless and unprofessional. So, pointless argumentative point.

What does that have to do with it? Whether he's a greatest DC or not, he still watches hours and hours of the "all 22 film" on all NFL offenses and he knows a hell of a lot more than you do about how ours compares to the rest of the NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ladypanther said:

lol...doubt that

I "lol'd" at this too.  Ol' Kenny must not realize how big of a role CMC will play in our offense.  Judging from his comment, he thinks we will be using him for like 3 plays a game or some ish and they'll know what to do every time.  All people freaking talk about is how versatile CMC is......but it's going to somehow make it easier for defenses when he's on the field? lol

Saints D gonna Saints D I guess, ha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Promethean Forerunner said:

Are you 12? I'll present this in layman's terms.

DC for Saints ---> Anybody is a creative offensive guru. 

NFL positional coach job is like any job. Talking smack about other coaches is moronic since you might end up working with him or her down the road. So, you don't. 

Generic statement uttered.

End of story.

Are YOU 12? Any coach who has a job in the NFL knows a hell of a lot more than any fan. That's a fact. He had no reason to call this offense unique or creative in the interview. He could easily have left that part out without "talking smack" about Shula. That's a ridiculous argument.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Hogmolliesmaht said:

So the Saints DC says our offense is creative and unique but our fans know that it's not because Shula sucks. Who is more believable?

I'd rather him say efficient and lethal.  Creative and unique might be true but its not ideal

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah I was crying about this earlier in the year when we got to 6 wins. Equal number to Wilks.  We are still a QB away. 
    • Hey y'all, a topic that has been on my mind has always been the parallels between two of the best quarterbacks in the history of the NFC South and ultimately their place in history and how they are viewed moving forward through the rest of NFL history. These two quarterbacks as you might have guessed are their respective franchises greatest signal callers, Cam Newton and Matt Ryan.  Cam Newton (144 Games Started): 269 TDs (1.8 per contest), 123 INTs, Super Bowl Appearance, OROTY, MVP  Matt Ryan (234 Games Starter):  394 TDs (1.6 per contest), 183 INTs, Super Bowl Appearance, OROTY, MVP  Obviously on first glance, these are very similar players with identical top accomplishments. Let's zoom in a little bit on their surrounding talent. C Cam Newton top offensive producers:  Greg Olsen (TE) (9 Seasons) (3 Pro Bowls) Steve Smith Sr. (WR) (3 Seasons) (1 Pro Bowl) Matt Ryan top offensive producers:  Julio Jones (WR) (10 Seasons) (7 Pro Bowls)  Roddy White (WR) (8 Seasons) (4 Pro Bowls)  Tony Gonzalez (TE) (5 Seasons) (4 Pro Bowls)  Wow, quite the difference here. Through Cam's career his top option was Greg Olsen, who was one of the best tight ends of his generation and a real difference maker in an offense reliant on their quarterback making plays outside of structure. Newton post Steve Smith Sr was saddled with a revolving door of Chicken McNobodies at the receiver position and the offense had to be funneled through the tight end and running attack as Jericho Cotchery, Corey Brown, Jason Avant, Kelvin Benjamin, etc was not getting the job done. Ryan on the other hand was consistently surrounded with top level offensive weapons, including one of the best receivers and tight ends in the history of the game, thanks in part to an aggressive general manager who wanted to ensure they could maximize the arm talent of their franchise quarterback.  How about protection?  Cam Newton top offensive lineman: Jordan Gross (3 Seasons) (1 Pro Bowl)  Ryan Kalil (8 Seasons) (2 Pro Bowls) Andrew Norwell (4 Seasons)  Trai Turner (6 Seasons) (5 Pro Bowls) Matt Ryan top offensive lineman:  Jake Matthews (8 Seasons) (1 Pro Bowl)  Alex Mack (5 Seasons) (3 Pro Bowls)  Andy Levitre (3 Seasons)  Todd McLure (5 Seasons)  While Matt Ryan certainly had more consistency and high level talent on his offensive line, one could argue they had similar protection through the bulk of their career. Though one has to acknowledge some of the absolute dog water lineman that were trot out to protect Newton at his tackle spots post Jordan Gross retirement. Byron Bell, Mike Remmers, Matt Kalil, Chris Clark, Amini Silatolu, Nate Chandler, etc were all a collective pile of garbage save for two seasons from Remmers and a few splashes of brilliance from Michael Oher, Daryl Williams, and early career Taylor Moton.  Defense should be fairly simple.  Cam Newton defense average rank:  17th/32 Matt Ryan defense average rank:  18th/32  Honestly I was a bit surprised by this, I had thought Cam consistently had the better defenses, but when you look at the average it's shockingly close. While Newton did have the higher peaks of defense, Atlanta placed higher more consistently and only really faltered towards the end of Ryan's career. Both these players had on and off again defenses to rely on.  So what does all this mean?  1. I am bored at work  2. Cam Newton has the better body of work given the talent around him  While I am not sure either is necessarily a lock to get a gold jacket, it's undeniable that Newton carried his franchise on his back for the better part of his career and changed how quarterbacks are viewed as a whole. Newton became the blueprint for a new breed of signal caller, and Ryan is the standard that is set for pocket quarterbacks in the modern league. Both players deserve their kudos for what they did for their franchises and how they morphed their team's identity, but Newton I think was clearly the better of the NFC South quarterbacks, especially if he had remained as healthy as Ryan did. 
    • 100% agree, trading him would be the best possible scenario. It allows for a clean start at QB and you get something back.
×
×
  • Create New...