Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Kalil Concerns


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Point being that way too early analysis is generally worthless.

You've been here enough seasons to know that.

Oh, I suppose it's too early to analyze the first five years of his career, especially as it pertains to whether or not you give him a team-unfriendly deal and a presumed starting role...

Alright.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Oh, I suppose it's too early to analyze the first five years of his career, especially as it pertains to whether or not you give him a team-unfriendly deal and a presumed starting role...

Alright.

No one's ever improved after healing from injury?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The guy has always been garbage. Add to this that he missed so many games in his career, and is coming off a surgery, I don't understand why Dave signed him in favor of Andrew Whitworth. Whitworth while old hasn't missed many games, and has played at a high level throughout his career.

I feel like Dave just threw the bones with the Kalil signing, like the Oher signing, but this time I don't think it's going to work out. That contract is scary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, E CaT PanTHer 2 said:

$13M fully guaranteed at signing

if 2018 option isn't picked up, the bonus is converted to salary and $11M is guaranteed 

2019 $7M fully guarantees

yes if the panthers can trade him, then they'll be off the hook, but if the Panthers cut him, those guarantees still have to be paid. 

Teams aren't on the hook for option bonuses if the contracted player isn't on the team of I understand correctly.  If Kalil were cut next season they'd basically pay him 11 mil to walk away because that first option converts into salary if its not exercised.  It's essentially a really expensive 2 year trial with an escape plan if it turns out to be a disaster after that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's wrong guys? I thought Dave was the GOAT talent evaluator and contract negotiator.

What horrendous offensive tackle that hasn't been good since his rookie season where he was overrated, and missed 14 games last season isn't a good signing for $55,500,000, $31,000,000 guaranteed? Don't worry, maybe the HIP SURGERY he had in the offseason will fix everything while playing beside his brother. LOL!

Andrew Whitworth was just sitting there.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All we can do is hope he catches on.  No one's panicking, but we knew this guy's weaknesses before we signed him.  Hopefully reps and eventual oline cohesion will help mask or mitigate some of his faults.  I'm like a lot of others in here though, would've rather taken a stab at Reiff, Okung or Whitworth but hopefully a good OL group including big bro will have some positive effects.  I also hope if another T outperforms him that the coaches don't feel obligated to start him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Remember when everyone was mad when we replaced Byron Bell with Michael Oher? No one thought he was an adequate replacement and were in panic mode back when he signed in March all the way until the beginning of the 2015 season. We ended up going 15-1 en route to a Super Bowl.

Let's let things play out with Matt Kalil before we crucify him after his first training camp practice

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The guy has always been garbage. Add to this that he missed so many games in his career, and is coming off a surgery, I don't understand why Dave signed him in favor of Andrew Whitworth. Whitworth while old hasn't missed many games, and has played at a high level throughout his career.
I feel like Dave just threw the bones with the Kalil signing, like the Oher signing, but this time I don't think it's going to work out. That contract is scary.


If we go by what Dave has said during his press conferences, it makes sense why he wouldn't go after Whitworth. Dave had repeatedly said that his job was to setup the Panthers for success in both the short term and long term. Whitworth would likely have been the better decision for this season and maybe next season. But then we're right back in the same boat where we're looking for another tackle. Matt Kalil on the other hand, if he works out, we have him for five years (during what should be his prime). If Kalil doesn't work out, then he can be released without destroying our cap.

Ultimately, maybe Gettleman could've gotten Kalil to sign for even less, but it's not like the Panthers are in bad shape with this deal. It's certainly a gamble, but if Dave put in the work to evaluate Kalil and believed that with our coaching he can correct some of his mistakes, then I'm psyched to see him this season.


Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, top dawg said:

I'm not panicking at all, just being cynical. 

The fact is, my ultimate position is sound. You don't sign Matt Kalil to such a lucrative contract because his play thus far in his career is not commensurate with the money that he's receiving. Secondly, your money could have probably been better spent if you were willing to make it happen. Thirdly, if you're bringing in Matt Kalil, make a run at another veteran to have some legitimate competition. Lastly, it borders on pure lunacy not to invest more in finding an exclamation point for the position, even in the short term, when you've half-assed it for year after year while not putting your QB in the best position to be protected from being pummeled, much less win.

 

Silotolu is our second LT. would you prefer for him to be number 1 with some scrub even worse as the number 2? It's possible the other guys mentioned here weren't even possibilities. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How do you expect him to step up in the pocket when Ickey is being pushed to the spot you want him to be. Stills don’t tell the entire picture.
    • They're examples of denying reality. Here are some others: ,- Bryce is the worst QB in the NFL right now (no he isn't) - Bryce is the worst QB in NFL history (no he's not; that's stupid) - Well then Bryce is at least the the worst QB in the league over the last three years (nope, he's actually improved a lot since year one, which was a turbulent year anyway) - That's not true, he hasn't Improved one but since his rookie year (oh come on) 🙄 - Well, even if he did, we can't win with him (obviously we can) - Yeah but not unless everyone else is damn near perfect (think the game film from our wins this year would back that up?) - Even so, we won those games in spite of him (officially the stupidest argument available) And no, those are made up. You can find those quotes and other equally moronic statements in various threads around the board. I know some folks always need to characterize whatever they're against as the worst thing in existence. It's hyperbole, and it's hypersilly. Likewise, you've got some who are so absolutely emotional about it that even if you think Bryce isn't good enough (which I do) they'll still call you a stan if you don't agree to label him the lousiest passer in existence 🙄 It's just dumb, and it's not realistic. But on the flipside, here are some statements which are; - Bryce is indeed capable of both playing in, and winning, an NFL game. Not on a consistent level though, and consistency is huge. - He is also capable of completing mid-range and even some deep passes; hell, he threw a beauty this past Sunday  - Yes, he has improved over his rookie season and over last year. Arguing against that is disingenuous. - Believe it or not, other players are the roster do make mistakes in games also.  - And lastly, while I know it hurts some people's narrative and arguments, Bryce does indeed deserve credit for the winning games he's played in this season. ... Every single one of those statements is true. And since i acknowledge all that, I must be in favor of keeping him in place then Except I'm not 😕 ... Don't know of anyone who doesn't think he'll get the fifth year option. Not ready to guarantee anything beyond that, though. So bottom line: Yeah, Bryce is fully expected to be our quarterback through next year. If there were a logical, realistic path to acquire a more capable starter and transition Bryce to a backup I'd be elated, but that's a pipe dream. This where we're at  I don't **** it, you don't like it, others don't either. But here We are so let's make the best of it that we can.
    • What does it matter how fast the wrs are with Bryce he is not hitting them anyway
×
×
  • Create New...