Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cox is actually a guy that may be poached if put out there.


top dawg

Recommended Posts

Some of us have been more than a little impressed by Bryan Cox Jr. Max Henson wrote a short piece portraying where Bryan Cox's head is at, and also what Rivera is thinking in reference to the rookie's progress. 


"The young man has got some ability - he's still got some growing to do - but he most certainly has caught our eye and shown his improvement every week."

 

Rivera has left the door open for Cox to come on in if he shows well on Thursday. 

 

"Thursday is very important, not just for him, but for a number of our young guys."

 

As a UDFA, Cox signed here because he wanted to work with Eric Washington. 


"Because Eric Washington is the best D-line coach in the league," Cox said when asked why he joined Carolina. "My pops even said that. He said he thinks I can improve under him."

 

How surprising? Not really. This is but another instance of a player wanting to come here because of a coach (e.g. Christian McCaffey, Matt Kalil).

Anyway, Cox is really taking advantage of his situation, and he wholeheartedly believes his work has been enough to let the Panthers or another team know that he is NFL worthy.

 

"It's either going to be good enough for this ball club or hopefully another one."
 

http://m.panthers.com/news/article-2/Bryan-Cox-Jr-battling-to-stick-around/477b9bf5-c84b-47d9-be13-8fbac5a1f7f2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, saX man said:

If Cox makes it that could be nice.  Him and Hall learning behind Addison, CJ, and Peppers would be huge.  If only Horton could kindly step out of the way.  

Believe me, I could see why we'd keep Horton. He's a severly underrated run stopper. The thing is though, we have cut him before (only to re-sign him of course), twice. At some point, you have to ask yourself is keeping him so important enough to risk putting a potential legitimate pass rusher on waivers to be poached.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Captain Morgan said:

I've posted this on a couple of other threads before, but going into the college season, Cox was rated a top 100 player.  I don't know what caused him not to get drafted after his senior year, but his father was a pro bowl linebacker.

Hope he does well Thursday.

I remember his father well. I did not like him. I like the son though. I think he's clearly ahead of Hall right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...