Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Love for vets and making the hard decision


yasuhara2241

Recommended Posts

I know that right now everybody is getting on Hurney with a lot of good reason, but my question is about Rivera. He will always trust vets over unproven players and usually he does this for a year or two longer than he should have. I know that Hurney listens to Ron, but how much of this is on Ron? Why play any vets in the preseason if they are guaranteed roster spots no matter what? 

QB: DA was outplayed by Webb and Gilbert. So we keep DA, cut Webb and add a rookie QB? TBH I don't mind the addition of Kaaya, but what has DA done to guarantee a roster spot? He played horrible last year in spot duty and looked even worse this preseason. 

RB: We kept 4 RBs and 0 FBs. There is no way we are keeping 4 active come game day. Make the decision and move on. IMO CAP has shown himself as a great backup to Stew and Fozzy is the backup to CMC. Only difference is Stew has injury history so I would go with CAP over Fozzy and save an extra position. 

FB: Armah showed real promise whenever he played. Def should be on the 53

DT: Keeping Love over Crume. I know Love has always been solid, but Crume had a really good preseason but that wasn't good enough to beat out a guy who couldn't get on the field. 

K: 2? Really? Just cut Gano and move on. Put confidence in whatever kicker you choose. We really punked out on this move. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think everyone has a valid point about the kickers. I assumed we've kept one for an impending trade. 

I wouldn't say that Love is done, and I can totally understand why Crume was sent back to the PS.

I don't understand why everyone is so bent out of shape over Armah. He was a long shot to make the team to begin with, and he simply isn't ready to be a consistent pro at the position. We may be evolving away from the position, and even if we aren't, Stew plays like a FB better than most FBs.

Fozzy and Cap play a different role in the offense (and special teams really). They are both good at what they do as far as backing up the functions that CMC and Stew do respectively, although both arguably do it at lesser roles. The running game (and passing game within the running game) has played and will play a central role within this offense, so keeping the dynamic going as best you can is paramount to our success.

I told y'all weeks ago that Webb wasn't ready to truly back a starting QB. He has always been shaky, and that's against second and third stringers. The more he played, the more his ineptitude and inconsistencies showed. Webb is an infinitely scarier proposition backing up Cam than Anderson, and one decidedly terrible preseason didn't change that fact, at least for me. At least Anderson has experience playing against ones, if not beating them. 

I don't have any big problems with what was done on cut day, although the kicker thing is somewhat of a head scratcher---maybe even a harbinger of confusion and indecision. I'm not absolutely sure it's a vet vs rookie thing.

In any event, I get your point. I've consistently talked about Rivera's undying love of vets not only on cut day, but game days. I just don't see that being the issue here with a still unseasoned Crume, the importance of the delineation of roles in the running game, and the relatively little importance that a fullback plays in the modern NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, top dawg said:

I think everyone has a valid point about the kickers. I assumed we've kept one for an impending trade. 

I wouldn't say that Love is done, and I can totally understand why Crume was sent back to the PS.

I don't understand why everyone is so bent out of shape over Armah. He was a long shot to make the team to begin with, and he simply isn't ready to be a consistent pro at the position. We may be evolving away from the position, and even if we aren't, Stew plays like a FB better than most FBs.

Fozzy and Cap play a different role in the offense (and special teams really). They are both good at what they do as far as backing up the functions that CMC and Stew do respectively, although both arguably do it at lesser roles. The running game (and passing game within the running game) has played and will play a central role within this offense, so keeping the dynamic going as best you can is paramount to our success.

I told y'all weeks ago that Webb wasn't ready to truly back a starting QB. He has always been shaky, and that's against second and third stringers. The more he played, the more his ineptitude and incinsistency showed. Webb is an infinitely scarier proposition backing up Cam than Anderson, and one decidedly terrible preseason didn't change that fact, at least for me. At least Anderson has experience playing against ones, if not beating them. 

I don't have any big problems with what was done on cut day, although the kicker thing is somewhat of a head scratcher---maybe even a harbinger of confusion and indecision. I'm not absolutely sure it's a vet vs rookie thing.

In any event, I get your point. I've consistently talked about Rivera's undying love of vets not only on cut day, but game days. I just don't see that being the issue here with a still unseasoned Crume, the importance of the delineation of roles in the running game, and the relatively little importance that a fullback plays in the modern NFL.

I don;t know how to post gifs but if I did it would be a standing ovation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, top dawg said:

I think everyone has a valid point about the kickers. I assumed we've kept one for an impending trade. 

I wouldn't say that Love is done, and I can totally understand why Crume was sent back to the PS.

I don't understand why everyone is so bent out of shape over Armah. He was a long shot to make the team to begin with, and he simply isn't ready to be a consistent pro at the position. We may be evolving away from the position, and even if we aren't, Stew plays like a FB better than most FBs.

Fozzy and Cap play a different role in the offense (and special teams really). They are both good at what they do as far as backing up the functions that CMC and Stew do respectively, although both arguably do it at lesser roles. The running game (and passing game within the running game) has played and will play a central role within this offense, so keeping the dynamic going as best you can is paramount to our success.

I told y'all weeks ago that Webb wasn't ready to truly back a starting QB. He has always been shaky, and that's against second and third stringers. The more he played, the more his ineptitude and incinsistency showed. Webb is an infinitely scarier proposition backing up Cam than Anderson, and one decidedly terrible preseason didn't change that fact, at least for me. At least Anderson has experience playing against ones, if not beating them. 

I don't have any big problems with what was done on cut day, although the kicker thing is somewhat of a head scratcher---maybe even a harbinger of confusion and indecision. I'm not absolutely sure it's a vet vs rookie thing.

In any event, I get your point. I've consistently talked about Rivera's undying love of vets not only on cut day, but game days. I just don't see that being the issue here with a still unseasoned Crume, the importance of the delineation of roles in the running game, and the relatively little importance that a fullback plays in the modern NFL.

I got you @RoaringRiot

giphy.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll say that I appreciated that Webb did anything the team asked: play WR, ST and QB3?  No problem.  He is a great dude, and Buffalo is going to be happy with what he does to the locker room.

On the flip side, that's the nature of the business.  You have to make the tough decisions.  Webb is not a starting QB in the NFL, and that's what this decision came down to. Webb kept some guys from making game day rosters, yet added little value outside of his ST position.  How many people have complained over the years that Hurney never made the tough cuts? Damned if you do, damned if you don't.

About DA...this is his last year.  DA has saved our bacon in some games, but he's just aging out. He's got a mess of kids, many under 5.  This is it for him.  We need to develop Kayaa so that he can come in and do something for us.  The staff likes him, so there's that.  But this season, if Cam can't go, would you rather have a known quantity who has played and won for our team, a guy who only lights it up against 3-4th string players (Webb) or a developmental guy who put the ball on the ground in crunch time (Gilbert)?  So that's why we keep DA.

Some teams can afford the rookie mistakes, to let them grow and learn on the field.  We're not in that phase.  Sure, Cleveland is, but we stand a much better chance of winning than Cleveland.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, d-dave said:

I'll say that I appreciated that Webb did anything the team asked: play WR, ST and QB3?  No problem.  He is a great dude, and Buffalo is going to be happy with what he does to the locker room.

On the flip side, that's the nature of the business.  You have to make the tough decisions.

The team making tough decisions doesn't bother me.

The fact that the two guys in charge now have a strong tendency to make the wrong decisions bothers me a lot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...