Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Do you trust... part II


beastson

Recommended Posts

no, but that's not going to be an issue.

if we have a 4 man rush...hoyer won't have many options to throw to.

if we have an aggressive blitz happy defense like i think we will, he's not going to have much time to throw to anyone.

shanahan is still probably the best offensive mind in the league, but he doesn't have near the weapons and OL he had last year. hyde is really good. goodwin can take the top off, but is still far from a sure thing when the ball gets near his hand. garcon is respectable...i guess. neither are anywhere near julio jones caliber, though.

to say that hoyer is a mediocre QB would be generous, but the fact that he's familiar with shanahan will probably help him out getting started. the OL is going to present some big problems for shanahan's offense. they just haven't looked good. our DL and pass rush should have no problem foiling most of shanahan's plans all day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, bull123 said:

Few secondary's can stop anybody without pressure....QB's are too good

This is true.  Doesn't matter how good the secondary is, a defense has to get to the qb eventually.  The real question is can our secondary hold the line long enough for the rushers to get to the qb?  I think we are better than last year at this time, but that isn't setting the bar all that high.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Between Bradberry, Worley, Munnerlynn, and Webster, we know Bradberry is on the rise, Worley has the floor of a solid but spotty CB2, and Munnerlynn is a great NB.  Webster is promising in case Worley is struggling.  I forgot if Corn can come back on the IR designated to return but I think we will be solid if the DL generates solid pressure.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I originally hated the Miller deal but with the cap projected to rise nearly $10M next season the Canes struck some pretty good deals between Miller and Ehlers. Most of the team is locked in for the next few years. Nikishin will need an extension probably in the $6M AAV range. And Blake will need one if we don’t move him. Personally I’d move Blake, picks, and any prospect not named Nikishin/Nadeau/Artamonov for McTavish as I don’t see any any of the big time players moving teams next year. Realistically the Hurricanes should just target Gustavsson next year to fix the goal tending issue. But I’m all for moving Blake, picks, and prospects for McTavish this year. Ehlers - Aho - Jarvis Svechnikov - McTavish - Stankoven Martinook - Staal - Carrier Hall - Kotkaniemi - Robinson Jost - Jankowski Slavin - Miller Nikishin - Chatfield Gostisbehere - Walker Reilly Andersen Kochetkov I’d do Blake, Felix-Unger-Sorum, and 27 2nd for McTavish.
    • Very true on the length but stuff like this is never where we shine. We aren’t a good team at drafting.
    • Homerism aside, the more I see from Dan, the more impressed I am.  His player evaluation instincts. Last year his 2 premier FA signings, Hunt and Lewis COMPLETELY changed the line and I have a feeling his success in choosing blue chip guys will continue.  Look at the panthers’s rep for FA signings in the past. By and large, it’s been guys 1 year past their prime who had an injury and suckered our GM in to a crippling contract. We never get nice things. When was the last time this team signed 2 young blue chip studs  in the same offseason to contracts worthy of their impact? Ever?  Im telling y’all, players respect and trust Morgan. 
×
×
  • Create New...