Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Do you trust... part II


beastson

Recommended Posts

no, but that's not going to be an issue.

if we have a 4 man rush...hoyer won't have many options to throw to.

if we have an aggressive blitz happy defense like i think we will, he's not going to have much time to throw to anyone.

shanahan is still probably the best offensive mind in the league, but he doesn't have near the weapons and OL he had last year. hyde is really good. goodwin can take the top off, but is still far from a sure thing when the ball gets near his hand. garcon is respectable...i guess. neither are anywhere near julio jones caliber, though.

to say that hoyer is a mediocre QB would be generous, but the fact that he's familiar with shanahan will probably help him out getting started. the OL is going to present some big problems for shanahan's offense. they just haven't looked good. our DL and pass rush should have no problem foiling most of shanahan's plans all day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, bull123 said:

Few secondary's can stop anybody without pressure....QB's are too good

This is true.  Doesn't matter how good the secondary is, a defense has to get to the qb eventually.  The real question is can our secondary hold the line long enough for the rushers to get to the qb?  I think we are better than last year at this time, but that isn't setting the bar all that high.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Between Bradberry, Worley, Munnerlynn, and Webster, we know Bradberry is on the rise, Worley has the floor of a solid but spotty CB2, and Munnerlynn is a great NB.  Webster is promising in case Worley is struggling.  I forgot if Corn can come back on the IR designated to return but I think we will be solid if the DL generates solid pressure.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Me, I'm sick of WWE channel hopping their PLEs and shows. Netflix now with Raw. USA still has Smackdown but you can't get it with Roku if you don't also have cable. Then they went from all the PLEs on Peacock to ESPN+ which required upgrading your Disney+ package. Then they frikkin' move Saturday Night Main Event with John Cena's retirement match back over to frikkin' Peacock, which we'd just cancelled two months prior because no PLEs there anymore. And there are fewer, but longer matches and its the same danged stories again and again. Rematch after rematch after rematch between PLEs. Fewer matches, fewer wrestlers, more promos (of lesser quality) and less action.  It just seems like it's all fillers and re-runs. I'm tired of Cody Rhodes. I'm tired of Jey Uso. I'm tired of the two Brons. Shuffle the deck a bit guys, this game's getting stale.
    • Chuba was 3 yards behind the 3 gap. He was lined up weak offset I. It was a 33 dive. Chuba needed to power through off of Ekwonu's block and slip off into the 5 gap where the Tremble had the lane sealed and Rick pulled the LB out of the 5 gap. Here's a visual if you need proof. Chuba did a jump cut laterally to the 2 gap on the right side with unblocked defenders crashing down and went airborne.   This is a 33 dive that should have been slipped off the block into the 5 gap. Chuba lacked vision, but you can see Rico and Bryce staring at the intended running lane sealed off by Tremble and Ekwonu. He should have read Ekwonu's block. The blocking and misdirection is NOT set up for the right side. The play worked. Chuba failed to execute on this play. Trust who you want to, but I wouldn't suggest you argue with the video. Anyone telling you this was drawn up to go right with the blocking did not analyze it. They are correct it should have been a called dive, and it was a called dive.  This was a weak offset I bringing Tremble in motion from the right to the left.
×
×
  • Create New...