Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PFF: Refocused Car-23 SF-3


JawnyBlaze

Recommended Posts

https://www.profootballfocus.com/news/pro-refocused-carolina-panthers-23-san-francisco-49ers-3

I know some of you place value on this site's "analysis".  No surprises this week.

Quote

Top 5 Grades:

DI Kawann Short, 88.6 overall grade

G Trai Turner, 88.6 overall grade

LB Thomas Davis, 84.9 overall grade

RB Jonathan Stewart, 82.0 overall grade

LB Luke Kuechly, 82.0 overall grade

Quote

QB Cam Newton, 66.9 overall grade

The Panthers are building a team around Cam Newton to help him be successful, but if they are to truly compete they need him to play better than this. He missed multiple open receivers, including blowing at least one clear touchdown after a coverage bust in the 49ers secondary, and completed just 55.0 percent of his passes when kept clean in the pocket, for only 5.5 yards per attempt.

RB Christian McCaffrey, 62.9 overall grade

McCaffrey put the ball on the ground when trying to bounce a run outside after avoiding a tackle in the hole, but the mythical ‘McCaffrey Playbook’ was relatively conservative, if it in fact exists, based on this game. He did line up in the slot, out wide and even as a wildcat quarterback, but it accounted for just 10 of his 49 snaps, with the rest featuring around the backfield in various formations. He did see dramatically more playing time than Jonathan Stewart, but wasn’t as successful with it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still don't get how PFF comes out with these grades just a few moments after the game's ended without looking at All-22, defensive assignments and playcalls.

Plus, the fact Star's name isn't on there is criminal. He was a huge reason for the defensive line's success.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Saca312 said:

Still don't get how PFF comes out with these grades just a few moments after the game's ended without looking at All-22, defensive assignments and playcalls.

Plus, the fact Star's name isn't on there is criminal. He was a huge reason for the defensive line's success.

This is how

ChimpManager.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Jay Roosevelt said:

I love how they don't even mention rust as a likely factor for Cam's performance, especially in the 1st half.

That's not how this works. It's a straight up grade on performance. Idk why you would be surprised. Cam missed a bunch of open throws, especially in the first half. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, mikeholiday said:

That's not how this works. It's a straight up grade on performance. Idk why you would be surprised. Cam missed a bunch of open throws, especially in the first half. 

So what you're saying is that their grades are awarded with a total lack of context?

Interdasting.

Know what grade I would give that kind of grading system?  Worthless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I take that CMC stuff as a positive actually.

It means he doesn't need to be cute to be effective and they cannnot for the rest of the season just key in on him in base packages because we did and will just hand him the ball up the middle.

I think Rivera was trying to see what he had in him as much as anything. To check themselves and make sure he can and will run between the tackles and he did. The OL push was crap and the first half and in the 4th Q was when they really started getting push...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, tiger7_88 said:

FIFY

Dude, you really do get testy when anybody criticizes Cam. I thought he was great in the 2nd half, but that first half was horrible and nobody but us cares whether it was rust or not. Just let it go. We all know that PFF is just a tool we can use to judge players and not the end all be all. That doesn't mean it's unfair or not useful at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Another thread where the Huddle melts down over a Bryce comment.  "Conversations" and "Bryce Young has been signed to a new long-term contract" are still far away from being the gospel.  For a fanbase that has watched two top-3 drafted QBs come here, and us move on, only to see them elevate their play elsewhere, I find it comical. Bryce is flawed but this org is damned if you do and damned if you don't with BY9.  Why would our GM and HC say anything other than supportive about their QB1. Yes, he's extended, but I truly do not think if he goes out and has a repeat of the previous seasons, that he is here beyond 2027. They're giving him every opportunity and surrounding him with a ridiculous amount of assets on both sides of the ball. If he continues to pitch 110 yd/ game and cough up the ball while everyone else is busting their ass, no way Dan keeps him beyond the extension.   
    • Ooof, I was not a Proctor fan. I agree w/ a lot of smarter folks than me that he's more of a guard and think his weight fluctuation is going to be something to navigate. I liked Lomu a lot, but figured there would be more talented guys there at 19. I also wasn't big on bringing in a TE via the draft. If it's not a vet (Njoku) or a trade for Mayer or Kmet, I'd just as soon see what the youngsters have. No need cluttering the room with more of the same.
    • Sam Darnold & Bryce Young are two very different Qbs ..just saying the last 25 years approximately 2/3 of ALL  first round Qb's  in the NFL were or are bust.so for everyone who makes it like a Sam Darnold you have two that don't make it or are a bust 
×
×
  • Create New...