Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So When is Curtis Samuel going to Make an Impact?


Hoenheim

Recommended Posts

Clearly he has a very unique skillset on our team being the only true speed WR that we have, so why is it that he's not getting much playtime, targets, and not being used very well? Almost all the passes I've seen to him have been very short passes with defenders draped all over him by the time the ball gets there. I know its too much to say that he should be starting on the outside, but with the way our team seems to be functioning now, McCaffreys getting alot of time in the slot, Stew is taking the vast majority of RB carries. I'll say that our WRs have been doing a much better job at getting open, but I think Samuel could be the real X factor that we're missing that could make the offense elite. 

Is he not 100% healthy? Coaches dont trust him or want to elusively play him in the slot/short routes for some reason even though he's by far and away the fastest player on the team? Give him a 30 something yard end around and never run him again? Maybe try him on the outside? There's just something I'm not getting here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't blame the guy for having basically no idea in the offense we are running.  The fact that McCaffrey can play almost every snap is beyond impressive.  You have to imagine the level of communication Cam had with Olsen, Benjiman, and now even Funchess... Samuel has a lot of catching up to do.  He is so talented you have to imagine it can't take too much longer, but it's getting about time to see something soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Being that this is a copy cat league, I saw a play from the LA Rams last week where they handed Tavon A. the ball out the back field basically lined up next to his qb for a thirty yard td. First thing I thought of was how we need to incorporate giving him the ball in a similar fashion being he took a ton of hand offs in college (if I knew how to Gif) but here's s link to the play http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-cant-miss-plays/0ap3000000858427/Can-t-Miss-Play-Tavon-Austin-skates-through-entire-Seahawks-D-for-TD?akmobile=ios&akcarrier=other&icampaign="search-video-tavon+austin" we've got to find ways to get the ball in his hands it doesn't take years to contribute it takes creative play calling at the proper times. I do think we need him to run more deep routes with Cam looking focused and accurate def should take a shot or two to make sure they respect our deep ball speed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem with running him on deep routes is he had injuries that probably limited his ability to consistently sprint downfield. Also, it may have been a function of the protection schemes not being trusted with our OL being beat up, and defenses blitzing hard. 

I see Samuel as a hybrid though. He simply isn't a good enough WR yet. He's a "playmaker". Just as CMC isn't good enough at reading the running holes at the NFL level yet. He needs time to see the opportunities instead of like in college where he just had big holes to run through. 

 

My personal opinion is that Stewart should have been, and still should be traded. That may be an unpopular opinion. But with CMC, Fozzy, CAP, and Samuel, there are enough weapons out of the backfield for this offense to find success. Imagine how a defense would have to plan to stop a formation that has CMC in the slot, Samuel and Funchess on the outside, Fozzy next to Cam, and then CMC and Samuel motioning around the field pre-snap....

You'd have no clue if it is a run or pass. Or read option. And, which of the speedy playmakers will get the ball.

 

Alternatively what we have now is the defense knows if Stew is in the game, there's a very good chance we are going to hand it to him up the middle. Or, if we decide to get "tricky", we will hand it to him stretched out, which plays more to the strength of every defense more than to the offense. Hell, even on a pass play with Stew in the game, the defense can simply count him out of the play as he is zero threat as a receiver.

I realize this won't change and it's just who this team wants to be. But, if you want true evolution, go ahead and trade Stew. Name CMC the starting RB, Fozzy as the backup, and Samuel as the slot WR. And then make all 3 interchangeable throughout the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Chardee MacDennis said:

The problem with running him on deep routes is he had injuries that probably limited his ability to consistently sprint downfield. Also, it may have been a function of the protection schemes not being trusted with our OL being beat up, and defenses blitzing hard. 

I see Samuel as a hybrid though. He simply isn't a good enough WR yet. He's a "playmaker". Just as CMC isn't good enough at reading the running holes at the NFL level yet. He needs time to see the opportunities instead of like in college where he just had big holes to run through. 

 

My personal opinion is that Stewart should have been, and still should be traded. That may be an unpopular opinion. But with CMC, Fozzy, CAP, and Samuel, there are enough weapons out of the backfield for this offense to find success. Imagine how a defense would have to plan to stop a formation that has CMC in the slot, Samuel and Funchess on the outside, Fozzy next to Cam, and then CMC and Samuel motioning around the field pre-snap....

You'd have no clue if it is a run or pass. Or read option. And, which of the speedy playmakers will get the ball.

 

Alternatively what we have now is the defense knows if Stew is in the game, there's a very good chance we are going to hand it to him up the middle. Or, if we decide to get "tricky", we will hand it to him stretched out, which plays more to the strength of every defense more than to the offense. Hell, even on a pass play with Stew in the game, the defense can simply count him out of the play as he is zero threat as a receiver.

I realize this won't change and it's just who this team wants to be. But, if you want true evolution, go ahead and trade Stew. Name CMC the starting RB, Fozzy as the backup, and Samuel as the slot WR. And then make all 3 interchangeable throughout the game.

so, who are you? you are somebody.  CMC?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think Dave touches the defense. That might be a mark against him but definitely a huge red flag for evero. He refuses to run anything other than soft zone and when you don't get pressure that's an awful scheme
    • You don't have to convince me. I think not picking up the option should absolutely be firmly on the table but I just do not see Tepper and Morgan doing that for previously stated reasons. Therefore I'm not going to bother entertaining the notion. Just hoping we actually get real viable competition. If that doesn't happen at the minimum then my perception of that is complete and utter professional malpractice.
    • It was absolutely a catch, and I can’t believe how many folks were stating, before the NFL’s apology, that the overturn was the right call.  The ultimate question in this case is this: can a player complete a catch with only one hand? Of course, we all know the answer to that question, and it is an emphatic “Yes.” T-Mac maintained complete control with one hand (believe it was the right) while the other came off when the ball hit the ground. The ball was in the same position in the one hand (watch T-Mac’s fingers in relation to the NFL shield on the ball) after touching the ground as it was when it first went to the ground. Going back to the question above, if one hand can establish control, then there was no need for the other to stay on the ball, so long as the ball doesn’t move in that one hand that stays on it   It blew my mind that they overturned this in the first place. This should not be a “We got it wrong on the replay because there wasn’t clear and convincing evidence.” This should have been, “That was absolutely a catch.”
×
×
  • Create New...