Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Waive A Safety. Promote A QB To Active Roster. Yes, That Means We Have 4 QBs.


Saca312

Recommended Posts

http://www.nfl.com/draft/2014/profiles/garrett-gilbert?id=2549982

 

I have some thoughts after sleeping on it.

1. Hurney has yet to make a move to compromise any future draft picks. He also hasn't done anything to improve the current roster. Maybe he truly is interim and just trying not to be bored?

2. GG doesn't really fit the style of offense the Panthers have been running with Cam, like, at all. He is a dink and dunker with no downfield throwing capability. Unless the plan is to move on from Cam sometime before this contract runs out, then I can only imagine GG is being used as a tutor to Cam, showing him the intricacies of the dink-dunk shtyle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Chardee MacDennis said:

http://www.nfl.com/draft/2014/profiles/garrett-gilbert?id=2549982

 

I have some thoughts after sleeping on it.

1. Hurney has yet to make a move to compromise any future draft picks. He also hasn't done anything to improve the current roster. Maybe he truly is interim and just trying not to be bored?

2. GG doesn't really fit the style of offense the Panthers have been running with Cam, like, at all. He is a dink and dunker with no downfield throwing capability. Unless the plan is to move on from Cam sometime before this contract runs out, then I can only imagine GG is being used as a tutor to Cam, showing him the intricacies of the dink-dunk shtyle.

1) So you don't think Seymour (who is getting more snaps than Worley) and Byrd are moves that have improved the roster? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Sorry, that was me :(

This does leave me with a question, though. Gameday rules always have the third quarterback inactive. I would assume that rule extends to a fourth quarterback as well, though I can't think of an instance of a team actually carrying a fourth quarterback during the regular season prior to this.

Hmm, perhaps converting a QB on the roster to WR?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ivan The Awesome said:

Prevented us from upgrading the kicker position and having a kicker for the next ten years. Instead we have Gano. Albeit he's been good, but that won't last very long. 

 

1) Butker wasn't an upgrade

2) Gano is #2 in the league in scoring

3) "Won't last very long" is a silly assumption 

The Legend of Butker lives on!!!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Jeremy Igo said:

There won't be any trades made. 

 

Once the teams in need of new QBs have signed them, Garrett will be safely placed back on the PS... where he was absolutely safe to begin with. 

 

In other words, derp. 

How do you know he was totally safe? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no problem with bringing Gilbert up. Especially with a starting QB who is more susceptible to injuries, it wouldn't hurt to potentially groom a decent young backup. What I do have a huge problem with is not letting DA go. He brings zero upside to any team. The only positive that anyone references when discussing DA is the fact that he beat Tampa Bay twice in 2014. Yet, people conveniently forget that in week 1 that year, DA literally gave the Buccs an easy game winning interception that was horrendously dropped.

4th Quarter.

1:49 to play.

Up by 3.

DA throws this beauty at our own 32 yard line.

Buccs.thumb.png.383f55cae372a2c800112cbe96051e6e.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...