Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Are Tops In The NFL With Something Special Teams Related. This Is Not A Joke.


Saca312

Recommended Posts

Woah. That's not something you hear everyday. 

The Carolina Panthers Special Teams are one of the best in the NFL at something. Surprisingly, it's not penalties.

The Panthers coverage unit as a whole has been one of the best in the NFL.

http://pantherswire.usatoday.com/2017/10/21/panthers-return-coverage-leads-nfl-through-six-weeks/

Quote

In terms of total yardage allowed on returns, the Panthers have allowed a very small number on both kickoffs and punts.

In six punts returned by opponents, the Panthers have only allowed a total of 29 yards. That’s the second-fewest total punt return yards allowed by a team in the league through six weeks. Only the 49ers have allowed fewer yards, giving up just 24 yards on 14 return attempts.

To put that number into a bit more context, Michael Palardy has punted 21 times in six games. With only six of them being fielded, that’s a credit to the Panthers’ coverage unit and to Palardy, himself, who is averaging almost 45 yards per punt. Eight of his punts have been fair caught, six have landed inside the 20 and only two have gone for touchbacks.

As far as kickoffs go, no team has allowed fewer total yards to this point on kickoff returns than the 45 the Panthers have allowed.

So, Panthers are 2nd best against punt returns and tops against kickoffs. Now, credit is certainly due to Gano and Palardy for being decent at their jobs and making life harder for the returners. However, still something pretty cool.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, brandon_87 said:

Kickoff numbers don't mean poo since we kick for the touchback instead if the high angle to force a return, but the bunt #s are good

Id rather them start on the 25 everytime than than have them start <25 and then have a big return fir a TD every so often

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, The Huddler said:

Id rather them start on the 25 everytime than than have them start <25 and then have a big return fir a TD every so often

 

 

I understand this point of view, but there is another side to this.

How often do you see returners fumble the ball? I would bet it is far more common than kick off returns for a TD. No chance of that with touchbacks.

Only 7 teams have a return average of more than 25 yards.  And since most kicks go at least a couple of yards into the end zone, only a couple of teams have an actual average starting field position beyond the 25. So many more times than not, the opposing team would have a worse starting position if we had returnable kickoffs.

But RR is risk averse so we will keep doing what we do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • After some of the calls last year probably won't see much of a drop off 
    • https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/48344034/nfl-begin-hiring-replacement-officials-given-state-negotiations-nfl-referees-association   Honestly fug these refs and their union. Resisting changes that would actually incentivize good performance and not seniority based systems. What a bunch of donkeys. Hope the replacements straight up take their jobs and never give them back. Sick of watching refs script games with no repercussions.
    • Donovan seems like highest risk to me. Lloyd and May have already established relationships with all these kids. There’s probably guys hitting the portal that they recruited from HS. And then there’s the possibility of transferring their own guys from their current teams. They’ve also been recruiting the HS kids for like the next 5 years already. Look at the Iowa coach who hit the ground running by transferring all his guys from his D2 program. Or going across sports to Cignetti transferring all his JMU guys year one then building off that to a national title year 2. Donovan is starting from square one having been in the NBA so long and he’s already 60. So you’re potentially punting year 1 for a guy you are just hoping to be a 10 year hire while you figure out how to actually develop your next home grown 20yr guy. That’s 1/10th of the time you have him, more or less at best. The hope would be that he would find some high level assistants who have been working the college recruiting trails already, but then are you giving up his ideal staff just to get a foothold in recruiting and transfers. Think Belichick year one was bad? Imagine how much worse it would be without Steve Belichicks transfer portal pulls. Hoping Mays or Lloyd are all they’re cracked up to be.
×
×
  • Create New...