Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Missing Proehl


CosmoGirl

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Farachlombardi said:

There we go again with the negativity . He was a great coach but I think Taylor is better .no need to knock proels good work he put in buddy . 

Really? why you all over his jock? And stop calling everyone buddy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, uncfan888 said:

He's been all over me for a day and a half. And it's just me.. No one else even though I'm not alone in my thoughts. He messaged me and posted on my profile. Creepy 

He did me too, until I told him to kma and put him on ignore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Farachlombardi said:

I could call people who ever i want and I'm just saying as it is he was a great coach . He was a big reason why we were able to have a great offense with no star wr in 2015 and he made ginn the great wr he is today . So how is that being on his jock? That's speaking the truth bud and I accept your apology for your ignorance - Farach Lombardi 

every post he makes you talk about how negative he is.  if you were a real therapist, you would want people to explore their negative thoughts not suppress them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Saca312 said:

our new wr coach got kb to run actual routes before he hurt his knee again.

i like him so far. funchess and kb are having better years under lance taylor.

Yepppp. Lance is doing well with the WRs. They are in position to catch but don't always get it. Cam sails em on them too. The WR coach is getting these guys to run crisp routes just they either miss or it's uncatchable. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, jfra78 said:

every post he makes you talk about how negative he is.  if you were a real therapist, you would want people to explore their negative thoughts not suppress them

The crazy thing is.. I'm not really that negative compared to a lot of people on here. He's just fixated on me for some reason 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
    • Most elite WRs aren't necessarily burners. Not a lot of elite WRs in the modern era were 4.3 guys. If anything, sometimes it seems like the super fast guys use their speed as a crutch and it hampers their development in the intricacies of route running.
×
×
  • Create New...